|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Black Rock, CT
Posts: 4,345
|
what hp can a 944/944S2/968 make in mild trim?
Hey-
I usually hang in the 911 section, but I'm looking for a little water cooled input. SCCA is considering a new IT class called ITR. It will be the fastest Improved touring class. I'm considering the jump from my current ITA car if the class goes through. Some cars considered for the class are the porsche 911SC, 944S 944S2 and 968. My questions for you water cooled gurus, are: What are these engines capable of? The rue book allows a balance and blueprint, .5 point compression bump, .40 over, slight port matching factory valve job, open exhaust, open air cleaner, and any ECU that can fit in the stock box. Which of the engines will show the best gains? The 968 3.0 liter engine is stock with 236 hp, where the same size engine in the 944S@ is 208. Why the increase? Now, the cars are classed at different weights, so if each engine gains the same, then the lighter car would be better, as the formula palns for a certain hp gain from stock. I know these are weird questions,adn i am a watercooled newbie, but I appreciate any thoughts or directions. Who is the best source for build info...Milledge?
__________________
Jake Gulick, Black Rock, CT. '73 yellow 911E , & 2003 BMW M3 Cab. Ex: 84 Mazda RX-7 SCCA racer. did ok with it, set some records, won some races, but it wore out, LOL[/B] |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sometimes Sacramento, Most of the time Concord, CA
Posts: 185
|
hey, welcome to watercoolness.....get it? eh?
anyways, I believe the 968 gains that extra HP and Torque mainly because unlike the S2 engine, the 968 engine has Variable Valve Timing . Maybe engine compression and other things offer some help, but i'm pretty sure that's the main contributor. Also, the 968 weighs about 200 lbs. more in stock condition and comes with a 6 speed tranny as opposed to the S2's 5 speed. Factor these things in and they both come pretty darn close. Since you mentioned chips, I don't believe their's a Wilks chip for the 968, but i'm sure theirs one for the S2, but alas, theirs some crazy things going on concerning the big guy right now......
__________________
1987 944 Naturally Animalistic "If you make the same mistake twice, doesn't that make a total of three mistakes?" |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Black Rock, CT
Posts: 4,345
|
Great info...it all helps, as I'm just getting my feet wet. (Bad joke there), LOL
Wilks chip? Big guy? I assume the big guy is wilks?
__________________
Jake Gulick, Black Rock, CT. '73 yellow 911E , & 2003 BMW M3 Cab. Ex: 84 Mazda RX-7 SCCA racer. did ok with it, set some records, won some races, but it wore out, LOL[/B] |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 218
|
Jake, give me a call. I'll get you pointed in the right direction.
The FR Wilks chips are not going to gain you much at all. The Spec 944 guys have tried them and only get a couple of hp, but they do smooth out the power band is what I'm told. JME can burn you a chip I'm quite sure, although I'm sure you will pay a fair bit more.
__________________
George Roffe |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 186
|
FR Wilks chips most certainly make a difference (seen it first hand).
There are also various chips for the 968 which perform well (racer-x, etc).
__________________
2008 BMW M3 | 6spd | Dinan catback |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 218
|
Quote:
The Spec 944 guys have dynoed them several times. They them to be worth 2 hp and some smoothing of the power band.
__________________
George Roffe |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
I've heard a good aftermarket air cleaner and ecu on a 968 is good for another 15hp or so, but i believe thats about all the beneficial work you can do to one of those engines without forced induction.
The S2 motor might benefit a little more from the compression and valve job, but I doubt you would see more than 220~ from one of these engines with that work.
__________________
keep the dream alive! 1988 944 NA (purple) |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
ProMax has a chip for the 968 that was featured in a recent excellence irrc
__________________
87 951 |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,554
|
Quote:
thanks to CJ: Thanks to 944 Boy: if i come across any more, i'll post 'em.
__________________
Kyle 2008 Mini Cooper // '83 Porsche 944 // '01 Mazda Protege [sold] // "Never break more than you fix!" - SoCal Driver |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: MA
Posts: 186
|
Thanks Eldorado, saved me some searching
__________________
2008 BMW M3 | 6spd | Dinan catback |
||
|
|
|
|
Cars & Coffee Killer
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: State of Failure
Posts: 32,246
|
What class do you put 951s in?
__________________
Some Porsches long ago...then a wankle... 5 liters of VVT fury now -Chris "There is freedom in risk, just as there is oppression in security." |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Visalia, Ca
Posts: 1,327
|
Cool, Thank's Eldorado, Both sheets look pretty close to being the same. I'm not sure how to read those exactly. But in certain spots the hp increase is abotu 15hp and, more hp in the begning. Hence the " More low end" power described from the wilks chip
2 thumbs up!
__________________
Jaime O. Thank god I crashed or i would never have owned a porsche 83 944 daily driver (clutch and tt time) 85 325e BMW T-boned R.I.P. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 703
|
968 with Light flywheel. Racer X 968 chip. K&N air Filter. The Finish line says it's faster. Even against many 911's. Especially if she's light.
__________________
1987 924S with 968 Drive front to back, Bilstein Insert on mod/stock Struts, 450# Hypercoils, 28mm Torsion Bars, Weltmeister Adjustable Sway Bars, Lindsey 968 Light flywheel, Spec Stage II Clutch, ToYO RA1's, Auto Power Cage & 6 pt Harness, KLA Strut Brace, Greasy hands, heavy foot, and lots of smiles |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Black Rock, CT
Posts: 4,345
|
Those curves are intersting.
In the first, I might submit that something is wrong in the stock baseline. 117???? And a chip added 20HP??? Thats about 18%?? Hard to understand. The second is more representative. The curve was certainly filled in....I imagine it drives much better, even though the peak number wasn't affected.
__________________
Jake Gulick, Black Rock, CT. '73 yellow 911E , & 2003 BMW M3 Cab. Ex: 84 Mazda RX-7 SCCA racer. did ok with it, set some records, won some races, but it wore out, LOL[/B] |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 218
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
George Roffe |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,554
|
both are wilk chips..
here's another.. Here is an Excel file of the same dyno graphs in chart form as analyzed by someone over at rennlist.. not to mention it cuts off about half a second on the 30-60 acceleration time.. and about a quarter second off of the 60-80 acceleration time... that means from 30-80, you save nearly an entire second of acceleration...
__________________
Kyle 2008 Mini Cooper // '83 Porsche 944 // '01 Mazda Protege [sold] // "Never break more than you fix!" - SoCal Driver Last edited by Eldorado; 05-30-2006 at 06:15 PM.. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Black Rock, CT
Posts: 4,345
|
Well, looking at all those it is easy to see some correlations, and some oddities. But....
it shows that the first graph shown, where the hp jumps a huge amount, has to be thrown out. It is not representative of anything that is real word. Something was wrong with the baseline pull. Period.
__________________
Jake Gulick, Black Rock, CT. '73 yellow 911E , & 2003 BMW M3 Cab. Ex: 84 Mazda RX-7 SCCA racer. did ok with it, set some records, won some races, but it wore out, LOL[/B] |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Carmichael, CA
Posts: 617
|
I have an SMT-7 piggyback on my S2 and it works really well. If you remove it from its box and modify a stock DME case, I'm pretty sure it would fit, then you get unlimited tuning possibilities. Are you restricted to using the stock barn-door AFM, or can you go to a MAP or MAF sensor?
__________________
1960 356 Super 90 - EFI'd 1989 190e 2.6 1991 964 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 218
|
Stock AFM. The ECU box must remain unmodified on the outside (including the connector). Inside is free.
__________________
George Roffe |
||
|
|
|