![]() |
turbo springs/struts/shocks on non-turbo
Greetings,
I am working on getting some specs together for a suspension upgrade for my 92' C2. From looking at the Bilstein part numbers, they are the same for both turbo and non-turbo models. The H&R spring part numbers, however, are different. From what I can gather, the turbo springs are somewhat stiffer. I have driven a car (only on the street) with a similar setup, which used non-turbo springs, and definitely felt I could live with something a little more aggressive. Now, for the questions: 1) Can I use the turbo springs and will this improve performance? 2) Is there a "cost equivalent" alternative other than Bilstein/H&R that I should look at? 3) Would duplicating the European RS spec suspension be a better option and where can I find the parts necessary (and part numbers) to do this? Many thanks for any help you can offer! |
If you plan on tracking the car, I'd go with Eibach's.
The H&R's are progressive, which is a great compromise for the street. Gives you a nice ride. But for the track, you really don't want progressive. You want them stiff right now. |
springs
thanks for the help, tyson. i do appreciate the feedback.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website