![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 177
|
Euro 3.2 price premium
Hi,
I am on the market to replace my beloved 3.2 targa and I stumbled upon a euro 3.2 for sale. I understand the differences (my dad drives a euro, I was driving a us) but I would like to get your opinion on the potential price difference - if any. Would you pay more for a euro 3.2? How much more? Off topic: I sold my 3.2 a few weeks before my daughter was born and she's will be turning 5 soon, it's not easy getting back on the right track ![]() Thanks! |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 3,493
|
Personally would view a grey market federalized 3.2 as a minor detriment - given the shortcuts and kludges some importers implemented - would also be concerned with ca emissions/registration/red tape, especially if buying out of state
That said, I do prefer the looks of the euro buperettes and Bosch h4s over their us counterparts |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 177
|
Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 3,493
|
this has a lot of good stats (assuming they're accurate) re hp for US and other markets -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porsche_911#Carrera_3.2_.281984.E2.80.931989.29
looks like the key difference engine-wise is higher comp pistons for the euro -- 10.3:1 (9.5:1 for the US market), which resulted in slightly higher hp -- 231 bhp vs 207 bhp (and US Spec 911s built from October 1986 produce 217 bhp through chip programming changes). There might also be gearing differences? Chipping an earlier us spec engine can get it at/above the later us spec hp. Further, since many 911s need (or have had) top end rebuilds to fix excessive oil consumption issues, it's easy to "hotrod" any of these engines during rebuild to be significantly faster then their stock euro counterparts. (favorite seems to be - bore cylinders to 3.4l and run single plug "max moritz" style pistons and with slightly hotter cams and matching/tuned chip for a noticeable bump). fwiw and good luck! |
||
![]() |
|
Recreational User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: A Mile High
Posts: 4,159
|
All other things being equal, Euro cars have always had lower values than US cars, for the reasons Darrin stated above.
|
||
![]() |
|
/ˈpɔrʃə/ PORSH-ə Fan
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 652
|
All things being equal, I would pay a little more for a Euro car. I certainly did. Especially one that was imported to US the year it was made, I can call the guy who imported it because his name is still on the import sticker, and its never left my town.
More HP, arguably better gear ratios, euro turn signals/side markers, and smaller rear impact bumpers. All pluses in my book.
__________________
1984 ROW Carrera Sunroof Coupe Schieferblau 1982 US SC Targa Moosgrun 1977 US 911S Sunroof Coupe - SOLD |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
gearhead
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Loverland, CO
Posts: 23,518
|
I don't think they were generally good reasons. The dealerships started spreading it and people bought in. They were 911S and often 930S. The people trying to get them registered weren't trashing these cars.
__________________
1974 914 Bumble Bee 2009 Outback XT 2008 Cayman S shop test Mule 1996 WRX V-limited 450/1000 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I have had both - it is hard to believe that it is basically the same engine. The euro is MUCH faster or at least it feels that way. I actually felt that the my US SC was faster than my US 3.2.
Yes, I would pay more for a euro (ROW). How much? Are the two identicsl cars for sale? Probsbly not, but around 10-15% I guess. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
the 3.2 was far stronger than the 3.0. not even close. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
|||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Euro cars are better in many ways, besides the engine and gear ratios the big bumpers on the US 74 and later cars, the stupid 85MPH speedo on some of the us cars, etc.
And the Euro 911/930's were cheaper, so I bought them, better and less money. Win win. Not so much now and some people even pay more for Euro's. But there are still a lot of people who believe they should still sell for less. This thread shows both beliefs. Things are always changing. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: On The Road
Posts: 2,285
|
I've driven many Euro 911s - both before/after a correct EPA/DOT conversion.
In the 'spunk' category, there is little to no difference feel wise between a US car vs. a Euro car - unless you really know how to drive a 911 and you are able to eek out every last hp (ie. in day-to-day driving, you will not notice anything). As someone pointed out, the possible conversion itself may be suspect. Half the time, they were not converted or 'Federalized' or whatever you want to call it at all. The following would have been done if it was done correctly: 1) Speedo replaced with MPH 2) UNLEADED gasoline sticker added to dash 3) Seatbelts and/or seatbelt buzzer added (DOT compliant ones) 4) Bumpers were left alone 5) Door bars added (so many conversion houses just added wooden broom sticks for photos - and then took them out - don't ask how I know). 6) Ride height may or may not be adjusted (but you guys know how to do that). 7) DOT compliant tires (if not on there already) 8) Headlights changed. 9) Side markers on the front fenders in amber added (sometimes) 10) CAT added on through US type exhaust (some Euro cars came with cats, others not) 11) VIN added to correct DOT area on front windshield 12) VIN sticker added to the drivers door jamb 13) Airpumps added if it had one on the US model The only thing I would worry about is shoddy door reinforcement work. And to answer your question, would I pay any more for a Euro 3.2? Never. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
Quote:
Look for those listed modifications, if not there, then treat it like it is a better than US car if all else is equal Rust, miles, etc.. Resale might be more difficult because of this perception of Fed. mods. So understand this going in. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
|
Mighty Meatlocker Turbo
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: North TexASS
Posts: 18,526
|
^^^
Neither of them have a rear booster, so they both suck anyway!!! |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
|||
![]() |
|
Mighty Meatlocker Turbo
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: North TexASS
Posts: 18,526
|
All the best to my bestest, Danish Dangler, Chris!
|
||
![]() |
|