Quote:
Originally Posted by Litle brother
As the head line indicates I wonder if anybody has experience reagarding 915 drive train loss measured on the dyno using regular/factory gear oil VS the thick Swepco 201?
I have read on the "Great www" that thinner gear oil has been used in race cars during qualification to make better times than oil used during races.
I have also read that running with 10-20mm lower oil level in the 915 also contributes to less drive train loss.
So can one, in light of the above(among many other factors) assume that running the Swepco 201 results in a bit more more drive train loss?
Cheers
Eskild
|
I think it would be a distinction without a difference. Maybe measurable in mathematical terms but Not by the seat of the pants method, LOL