Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaun @ Tru6
Haha, ok smart guy, you win! Cuz AZ and MA are like N and S Dakota they are so alike.  Let's not change the subject because you don't want to be proven wrong. |
Poor Shaun...Never seems to see the folly of his own "logic", even when lead around by the hand, and/or when it's thrown back at him.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaun @ Tru6
What does the death rate have to be on a weekly or monthly basis over 1 year, or 2 years, for Denmark, Finland and Norway to just equal the Swedish death rate to date?
That's the math you need to do. That's the topic we are on.
Sweden: 5550 deaths to date
Norway: 251, Sweden 22 times # of deaths
Denmark: 609, Sweden 9 times # of deaths
Finland: 329, Sweden 17 times # of deaths
|
Well, if you are not inclined to include even the most basic/obvious variables, like population/per-capita numbers, I'd say you need a refresher on arithmetic, or you are just being willfully ignorant. If it's the latter, then lets play:
Wait, Shaun! You forgot Iceland, another Nordic country (so, it must be "comparable"): 10.
Findland: 33 times # of deaths of Iceland
Denmark: 61 times # of deaths of Iceland.
Norway: 25 times # of deaths of Iceland.
What does the death rate have to be on a weekly or monthly basis over 1 year, or 2 years, for Iceland to just equal the death rate for Denmark, Finland, and Norway?
That's the math you need to do. That's the topic we're on (cuz I say so
).
How are Finland, Denmark, and Norway "getting it so wrong" compared to Iceland?
Why are they failing so much compared to Iceland?
Why are we all not following the "Iceland" model?!?!?