Quote:
Originally Posted by Baz
The armorer's attorney stated that she showed and demonstrated to the AD the gun and all the chambers with dummy cartridges in it before handing it over to him.
If that is the case, how can she be at fault? Sounds like she did her job.
Remember this rehearsal was not scheduled. The armorer was not informed it was even taking place.
And the usual cams that are set up to monitor a set were not in place/working - so unless you were inside that church - you wouldn't even know the gun was going to be handled by anyone at that time.
Hard to put the blame on the armorer but at this point too much speculation and little facts to reach a hard conclusion....
|
What else would he say? You don't take that for the truth, do you?
I've been sued before and I can tell you that there are more lies in a courtroom than there are at a fishing camp. Or used car lot. In fact, I'd believe what I heard on a car lot before a courtroom.