View Single Post
PeteKz PeteKz is offline
PCA Member since 1988
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: SW Washington State
Posts: 4,225
Garage
I have 'em. I like 'em. They give a good combination of low RPM torque and high RPM power. I don't have a lot of experience with different cams in 911's though. I know that with my CIS 3.2LS engine, I can floor the pedal at 1300 RPM and it pulls cleanly to the top of the rev range. Now, as a matter of good mechanical practice, I don't usually floor the pedal below 2000 RPM, but it shows that the combination of M1's plus CIS is very drivable across the rev range, which is what I like for a street driven car that isn't a high-RPM track car. It also gets close to 30MPG at 70MPH cruise.

With 3.0 small port heads and 40mm carbs, I think they would work very well.

Let's wait for Ian to weigh in, because he helped William Knight develop the cam.
__________________
1973.5 911T with RoW 1980 SC CIS stroked to 3.2, 10:1 Mahle Sport p/c's, TBC exhaust ports, M1 cams, SSI's. RSR bushings & adj spring plates, Koni Sports, 21/26mm T-bars, stock swaybars, 16x7 Fuchs w Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+, 205/55-16 at all 4 corners.

Cars are for driving. If you want art, get something you can hang on the wall!
Old 03-07-2023, 09:28 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #2 (permalink)