Quote:
Originally posted by bryanthompson
Because Iraq isn't part of the War on Terror, right? 
Saddam paid terrorists to blow themselves up in Israel. There are numerous connections to Al Qaeda and Saddam. I don't see this non-connection you people keep chanting.
|
Err... thats not what I posted.
-Iraq
is part of the war on terror.
-Iraq
is the war on terror.
Can you distinguish any difference in the above statements? Do you believe they are both true?
A response to say, spend less in Iraq & spend more on the war on terror (though given he didn't even say "more" unless it is necessary) is not contradictory in any sense. It would mean that less is spent in Iraq & more on other aspects of the war on terror. What other aspects? I don't know, maybe getting OBL, the guy who murdered thousands of Americans, is looking disturbingly healthy. I realise this is "not a priority" for some though.