[legion]

I thought the first half of the article was spot-on. The second half is lacking.

I think her premise that congress and the press propose two very different solutions for the same problem with similar consequences is very telling. Both education and oil are absolutely vital to the health of the country. The price of each is increasing at unsustainable rates. So why is the solution to one to tax and create artificial price controls, while the solution to the other is to subsidize and let the price fall where it may?