|
len....Your statement simply points out the abiguity of the second amendment. It still does not answer the basic question since there is, apparently, no consensus at any level on that part of the law's meaning. It is subject to individual interpretation.
I would be very interested in the sources you have. Seriously. If I am in error and the issue has been legally decided, I would be glad to admit it.
B.F. :I assume the photos are a means of intimidation? BTW: "National Guard"...your reference; not mine. Another "straw man" argument.
Too much emotion involved in this subject; not enough common sense.
__________________
Bob S. former owner of a 1984 silver 944
|