Quote:
Originally posted by ianc
Remember that we can't know for sure whether the 159's actually flow more than the 158's with the data we have available, because Stan's site does not list the pressures at which these flow rates were derived for the 159. If it was tested at a higher press than that listed for the 158, of course the flow rate will be greater.
ianc
|
You are correct, this is why I only compared the 158 to the 201 and adjusted for the 2.5bar vs 3bar test pressure. Note that the 158 where tested at 2.5bar while the 201 was at 3bar. But if you convert them to same test pressure the 201 is almost a match to the 158 with the 201 being slightly higher.