[Dan in Pasadena]

First, before anything else let me say I am NOT a fan of Nicole Kidman's looks but she is INCREDIBLY hot (to me) in this movie. I have been a critic of her look since about when she did Moulin Rouge. Someone had the bright idea to tweeze her eyebrows into upswept points making her look "witchy" to me and to make her overly blonde which made her look hardened. She is the ultra rare natural strawberry-blonde, why mess with that? She was beautiful in her early films. Anyway, in this movie she plays a psychologist so she is in fitted business attire and just looks SO FRIGGIN hot.

Okay, the movie is good. I'd recommend it. BUT, IMHO it isn't nearly as creepy as the original 50's version nor the '78 (I think!) version with Donald Sutherland. But still, it IS good just, well... different.

I won't give away the ending of course but I found it sort of odd.

Interested to hear your opinion, especially from those that have seen the earlier versions.

P.S. Very obvious that downtown L.A. was doubling for D.C in a lot of scenes.

OOPS! Should be in the OT forum, sorry!