|
Writer/Teacher
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Wandering Connecticut
Posts: 9,293
|
I have noticed that different areas of the U.S. have different "fat stats". I live in New England, which is probably about half-and-half. It actually seems like healthy, athletic lifestyles are de rigeur in New England right now, so most of the people I know are very physically fit. But I also run into a lot of people who are anything but...
The interesting thing is that I have noticed that the more affluent towns in New England tend to be thinner, and the poorer sections tend to be fatter. This is easy to figure out: healthy food is simply more expensive than McDonalds and Taco Bell, and people with more leisure time (the wealthy), and who must maintain a social image are more apt to work out. It's weird - 200 years ago, being overweight was a signifier of affluence, and now it's becoming a signifier of "trailer trash"...
Travelling through the midwest, I couldn't believe how many people were simply obese. MUCH more so than in the northeast U.S. Then when I got to the west, however (the urban areas at least) are very fit, comparatively. Probably more so than New England.
I suppose it makes a bit of sense: where you find affluence and well-educated people (along the coasts), you also find healthy people. I suppose we shouldn't be surprised. There's an awful lot of people in the swollen, bloated American heartland, however....
__________________
Current Stable: Black 07 Porsche 987 Cayman S: Long-Tube Headers; FabSpeed Exhaust; VividRacing ECU Tune; IPD Plenum; 997GT3 Throttle Body. Blue 1983 Porsche 928S. 1985.5 Porsche 944 Rat Rod. 2011 Acura MDX. 2008 Mazda 3. Gone But Not Forgotten:Garnet Red 86 Porsche 951("The Purple Pig"). Alpine White 83 Porsche 944 ("Alpine Wolf"). Guards Red 84 Porsche 944.
|