Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Higgins
Of course I said a good deal more than that, and now you have chosen only one sentance (presented out of context) in your efforts to support your original conclusion. Are you taking lessons from JYL or something?
You still have not addressed my original point, even after I went through all the trouble to clarify it for you. It's really quite simple - if a given set of road users present an unusual hazard for all others, and are only on the road for their own ammusement, it seems quite reasonable to demand they stay off of the roads. If they are materially contributing to the benefit of all, then we should make allowances for their use of the road. It's really not that hard of a concept.
|
this reminds me of sports car groups somehow... even if I agree (partly) with you