Quote:
Originally Posted by javadog
I'm sure their lawyers are quite aware of the concept. I'm equally sure that 100% of the communications like that don't get reviewed by the lawyers before they go out.
It's irrelevant, in that you would have to be halfway illiterate to confuse that memo with the one used in the 930 case, which I still remember. A 930 is a different beast to a GT. I drove them for over 30 years and had no issues, mainly because I have a fair amount of driving skill and I'm not a dumbass. Frankly, it pisses me off that people win lawsuits like the 930 case. Regardless of the handling characteristics of a particular car, it's always some dumbass doing something stupid that gets them in trouble in the first place. The previous lawsuit about the GT on the track that crashed when some idiot got in the way of the GT while pulling out of the pits and another idiot couldn't deal with that small problem just pisses me off. Had I been on that jury, Porsche would not have lost anything.
It takes months of training and certification to be able to legally fly the slowest and safest airplane ever made yet any idiot with a large bank balance can legally buy a car like this and kill himself the same day.
JR
|
So you are in favor of letting anyone fly a plane with no training or license, or do you think that some advanced training should be necessary in order to purchase a supercar? Your rant has me confused.
