![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: puerto rico
Posts: 88
|
![]()
Hello guys any install rsr sprint camshaft in 3.0 or 3.3 turbo engines >
let the results, i interesting if work great or not. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 7,269
|
Not an expert and this is way out there.
However, I suspect that because of the valve timing over lap it would most likely be awful. The back pressure in the exhaust would want to blow exhaust gasses up into the intake at low rpm until boost comes up enough to offset. Then it might start blowing intake charge past the exhaust valve at some point. If you did get it to work, the CIS would probably quickly run out of fuel as we are talking a usable power band from something like 6k to 8k. If really wanted to do this would probably need a huge turbo that dose not show any boost until something like 4500rpm. Would have to open up the intake and exhaust a bunch. To get enough fuel might be able to use a large V8 fuel head with the two extra injector lines plumped in before the throttle plate for extra fuel. Probably would not idle below 1500rpm. Crazy stuff i suspect if you are up for the challenge. ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 7,269
|
Oh, and you will need new rods and cross drilled crank with oiling mods to alow it to spin up along with the other stuff for high rpm work.
|
||
![]() |
|
3 restos WIP = psycho
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: North of Exit 17
Posts: 7,665
|
That cam would work either only with narrower lobe spacing or with MASSIVE boost. As OME spec, it would only run above 5000 RPM w/ the stock 101 lobe spacing and subsequent overlap. Lookie here:
![]()
__________________
- 1965 911 - 1969 911S - 1980 911SC Targa - 1979 930 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: puerto rico
Posts: 88
|
thanks guys for your technical information, i think is not recommended for turbo engine, I try looking a 964 cams.
thanks, Jose |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 7,269
|
That is a proven approach.
SC's might be just a little better but they are pretty close to being the same. C2's might be better if you have your ports opened up and built a 3.5 or such. Truth is you probably will not see any differance between the two. Just a guess. |
||
![]() |
|