![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 4
|
Valve clearance to smal
Dear forum,
I'm rebuilding from scratch a 911 2.2 E engine 1971. This is the constellation: because the old cylinders and pistons were no longer usable, I had to buy new ones. And because the 2.2 was not available, I had to take 2.4 E pistons from Mahle, OE-Nr 911 103 943 02. I kept the crank and rods from the 2.2 E. I had to put 2 copper gasket rings to get a deck height of approx 1.2 mm. The valve lift at TDC overlap is within specs, 3.10 mm. And this is my problem: the valve clearance.For the intake valve of cylinder 1, at 360° it is 2.5 mm, at 368° it is 2.5 mm, but at 375° it goes almost to zero. What can I do? Put more gaskets under the cylinder? Or is there a problem with changing the 2.2 to 2.4 Cylinders? Thx for your answers. Pieke. |
||
![]() |
|
Under the radar
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Fortuna, CA. On the Lost Coast near the Emerald Triangle
Posts: 7,129
|
From what I can understand by your description, your cam timing is not correct.
At TDC firing on #1 intake your valve clearance should be .1 mm. At TDC overlap you should have no valve clearance as the valve should be slightly open. At TDC firing on #1 the punch mark on the cam should be at the top. I don't see how the cylinder base gaskets have anything to do with the valve clearance.
__________________
Gordon ___________________________________ '71 911 Coupe 3,0L outlawed #56 PCA Redwood Region, GGR, NASA, Speed SF Trackrash's Garage :: My Garage |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,346
|
He’s talking about piston to valve clearance.
You don’t need a lot of clearance. .8mm is enough. You can try retarding the cam slightly. If you have to, you can get deeper pockets cut into the pistons. -Andy.
__________________
72 Carrera RS replica, Spec 911 racer |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 4
|
Sorry, Trackrash, that I wasn't clear enough. But it was indeed valve to piston clearance.
@ Eagledriver: I am following Wayne's book, and hè persists that for intake it should be 1.5 and for exhaust 2 mm? I will first try what the effect is by retarding, since cutting out the heads is a bit more work... . |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 4
|
Here I am again, about retarding the cam. Since I have replaced the 2.2 by 2.4 pistons, and since they have different specs, which one should one take? And retarding means that the valve lift at TDC overlap ( within specs ) is bigger or smaller?
Thx. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,346
|
The Porsche workshop manual for the early 911 engine specifys.8mm minimum clearance. Others recommend bigger clearance to be more conservative. Retarding the cam means using a smaller value of intake valve opening at TDC. I don’t know if the problem is from the switch of pistons.
-Andy
__________________
72 Carrera RS replica, Spec 911 racer |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,346
|
I would use the spec for the 2.2 engine. You still have a 2.2 just with different shaped pistons.
-Andy
__________________
72 Carrera RS replica, Spec 911 racer |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Rate This Thread | |
|