Pelican Parts
Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   Pelican Parts Forums > Porsche Forums > 911 Engine Rebuilding Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Reply
Registered
 
rodoredas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melb, Aus.
Posts: 407
Deck Height, Dome/Combustion volume chart

Hi folks,

I'm new to the engine rebuild forum with plans to start such a project maybe next year, meanwhile doing lots of theory.

I've built a Compression ratio chart to get an understanding of the tolerances of Deck height, dome volume and combustion volume in an attempt to reverse engineer the dome and combustion volume of a stock standard 2.7L engine #6370345 911/81 CR 8.5 121KW/165HP.

The absence of an engine in pieces to measure has led me to create this chart which shows for a given Bore/Stroke/Deck height various combination of Dome and Combustion volumes that give a specific Compression ratio.

Here's a sample showing various volumes give CR 8.5 for 90/70.4/1
I've cross checked the calculations against other known data eg from the JE Pistons tables for various bore/stroke/deck combinations.

2.7L engine #6370345 911/81 CR 8.5 121KW/165HP.


Here's an example of a 3.0L engine showing in 2 pictures the change in compression when deck height changes from 1mm (.040) to 0.75mm (.030) for each of the various combinations of dome and combustion volumes - Engine 6411313 930/16 CR 9.3

CR 9.3 on 930/16 engine


CR 9.8 on 930/10 engine



So what's the point of all this - my question is - what is the factory dome/combustion volumes for this engine (2.7L engine #6370345 911/81 CR 8.5 121KW/165HP.) given the data above in the relevant chart.

cheers
Shane

__________________
Shane
1975 911 Coupe 2.7L 4Spd CIS Sporto 9115100500
1977 911 Targa, 3.0L, 5 Spd LSD, Zenith Carbs modified, SSI, Dansk 9117310158
Old 08-29-2019, 03:04 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #1 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 12,607
Garage
Compression ratio calculation.......

Shane,

I could not follow or understand your tables. What equation or formula did you use to calculate compression ratio. Give as an example how you arrived to such number. Thanks.

Tony
Old 08-29-2019, 06:15 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #2 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,601
Here. Compare these with your numbers.

PORSCHE - PORSCHE 911 - JE Pistons
Old 08-29-2019, 06:55 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3 (permalink)
Registered
 
rodoredas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melb, Aus.
Posts: 407
Hi Tony and dannobee,

I'm using the standard CR=Max Volume / Min Volume using the V1,V2,V3,V4 variable definitions to work out Max and Min volumes.

V1 Swept volume
V2 Deck Height volume
V3 Cylinder Head volume
V4 Piston Dome volume

CR=V1+V2+v3-V4 / V2+V3-V4

The chart use inputs for Bore/Stroke and Deck Height shown at the top.
in the chart Dome volume runs left to right, Combustion Volume top to bottom and they can run in any increment I choose 1 or .1 or .2, below I've changed the Dome Volume increment to .1

Once you enter the Bore/Stroke and Deck at the top, the cells in the matrix simply display the compression ratio for the Dome and Combustion grid cell.

I've run many test against the JE Piston chart, here's a couple of random examples showing same CR.








You can see in the first chart in my first post that there are many variations of Dome/Combustion cc that give a compression ration of 8.5 - I'm just curious as to what the real factory values are so made a calculator to see all possibilities and it works for any bore/stroke/deck height combinations.


Cheers
__________________
Shane
1975 911 Coupe 2.7L 4Spd CIS Sporto 9115100500
1977 911 Targa, 3.0L, 5 Spd LSD, Zenith Carbs modified, SSI, Dansk 9117310158

Last edited by rodoredas; 08-30-2019 at 03:37 AM..
Old 08-29-2019, 10:03 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #4 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Montgomery Tx
Posts: 1,756
Garage
Man, some people have a lot of free time on their hands. My brain hurts just looking at that.
When I have free time I watch Ridiculous with Rob Dyrdek. Much easier on my brain.
Old 09-05-2019, 04:20 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #5 (permalink)
Under the radar
 
Trackrash's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Fortuna, CA. On the Lost Coast near the Emerald Triangle
Posts: 7,129
Garage
When I built my last motor, I did something similar. I created a spread sheet with the CR formula and spaces for all my measurements. That way after I measured my deck height, piston dome, and head volume all I had to do was input the numbers. I also validated all the published numbers for the pistons and heads.

Then I could adjust my deck height and see what affect it had. Then the spread sheet would automatically recalculate after each change I entered.
Edit to fix typo in equation
__________________
Gordon
___________________________________
'71 911 Coupe 3,0L outlawed
#56 PCA Redwood Region, GGR, NASA, Speed SF
Trackrash's Garage :: My Garage

Last edited by Trackrash; 09-05-2019 at 02:24 PM..
Old 09-05-2019, 09:05 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #6 (permalink)
 
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 12,607
Garage
Compression Ratio Equation.........

Gordon,

Could you explain why your equation for calculating compression ratio is different from that of the OP? I have used several times in my rebuilds the equation similar to OP’s equation and got very close values to known CR’s. Thanks.

Tony
Old 09-05-2019, 11:26 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #7 (permalink)
Registered
 
Walt Fricke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Posts: 7,275
Gordon - I assume your spread sheet used "-V4" and not +V4?
Old 09-05-2019, 11:32 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #8 (permalink)
Under the radar
 
Trackrash's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Fortuna, CA. On the Lost Coast near the Emerald Triangle
Posts: 7,129
Garage
I was wondering if anyone would notice that I had incorrectly displayed the equation.

In fact I confirmed I used the correct equation - V4 in the actual calcs and will edit my post accordingly.
__________________
Gordon
___________________________________
'71 911 Coupe 3,0L outlawed
#56 PCA Redwood Region, GGR, NASA, Speed SF
Trackrash's Garage :: My Garage
Old 09-05-2019, 02:12 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #9 (permalink)
Registered
 
rodoredas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melb, Aus.
Posts: 407
Good on you Gordon a like mind!

In mine I'm coming from the point of view of not knowing Dome and Chamber volume so made it to see the possible variations of both (across and down) for given Bore/Stoke/Deck.

I assume the factory Dome/Combustion cc for a 2.7 engine 90/70.4/1 is something like 15cc/68cc or 16cc/69cc or something close to those based on the matrix in my first chart.

cheers
__________________
Shane
1975 911 Coupe 2.7L 4Spd CIS Sporto 9115100500
1977 911 Targa, 3.0L, 5 Spd LSD, Zenith Carbs modified, SSI, Dansk 9117310158
Old 09-05-2019, 10:21 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #10 (permalink)
Registered
 
rodoredas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melb, Aus.
Posts: 407
Hey Gordon just for fun plugged your numbers into mine with same answers, and can see how small changes in Dome cc and Combustion cc affect CR

Cheers

__________________
Shane
1975 911 Coupe 2.7L 4Spd CIS Sporto 9115100500
1977 911 Targa, 3.0L, 5 Spd LSD, Zenith Carbs modified, SSI, Dansk 9117310158
Old 09-05-2019, 10:41 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #11 (permalink)
Registered
 
targa72e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: denver
Posts: 1,143
Quick thought. If you can hit desired compression with less piston dome volume that's generally better. In general if you need less dome volume to achieve the desired compression ratio with a hemispherical combustion chamber, with two valves you will make more HP and require less ignition advance. This is particularly true with a single plug. The reason is a smaller piston dome doesn't implead flame propagation as much as a larger dome. Less important with twin plug as the flame front starts from two locations. CIS pistons are designed to concentrate the combustion around the single plug, That is why they have a offset dome.

john
Old 09-07-2019, 09:02 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #12 (permalink)
Registered
 
rodoredas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melb, Aus.
Posts: 407
Thanks John, good information to know.
cheers

__________________
Shane
1975 911 Coupe 2.7L 4Spd CIS Sporto 9115100500
1977 911 Targa, 3.0L, 5 Spd LSD, Zenith Carbs modified, SSI, Dansk 9117310158
Old 09-09-2019, 10:35 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #13 (permalink)
Reply


 


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:22 AM.


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page
 

DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.