Pelican Parts
Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   Pelican Parts Forums > Porsche Forums > 911 Engine Rebuilding Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Reply
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: California
Posts: 724
Piston ring gaps

Can anybody give me some guidance on what to set the piston ring gap for 2.0S rings? Everything is Mahle if that makes a difference.

The factory workshop manual shows the ring gap to be 0.15mm (0.006") which seems a little small, not that I know more than the factory, only everywhere else I look they give a rule of thumb like 0.004" per inch.



What gives? Do we run super close rings on early cars or did the factory have a misprint in their specs?

andy

Old 03-05-2020, 02:22 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #1 (permalink)
Under the radar
 
Trackrash's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Fortuna, CA. On the Lost Coast near the Emerald Triangle
Posts: 7,129
Garage
The spec is 0.006 to 0.0177". So 0.006" is the minimum allowed.
__________________
Gordon
___________________________________
'71 911 Coupe 3,0L outlawed
#56 PCA Redwood Region, GGR, NASA, Speed SF
Trackrash's Garage :: My Garage
Old 03-05-2020, 06:39 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #2 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,243
I might ere on the loose side. An extra .01, .02 will have 0 effect on the compression. Too tight and they touch, the ring begins to twist or buckle and lose contact.
Old 03-08-2020, 10:59 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,621
If the ring gap is too small it can pull the top of the piston right off. No, I'm not joking.
Old 03-08-2020, 11:49 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #4 (permalink)
Functionista
 
manbridge 74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: CO
Posts: 7,717
Looks like your using factory parts and using factory specs won’t give you any issues. The spec is not a misprint, the cylinders really do expand on these.
__________________
Jeff
74 911, #3
I do not disbelieve in anything. I start from the premise that everything is true until proved false. Everything is possible.
Old 03-08-2020, 01:19 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #5 (permalink)
Registered
 
VFR750's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Windsor, CT
Posts: 2,119
That spec is correct for air cooled cylinders.

.004/1” bore is for water cooled engines.

I did 0.008” gap on all. Just fine
Old 03-12-2020, 02:41 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #6 (permalink)
 
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: California
Posts: 724
Quote:
Originally Posted by manbridge 74 View Post
Looks like your using factory parts and using factory specs won’t give you any issues. The spec is not a misprint, the cylinders really do expand on these.
Thank you. That was the part I was missing in all of this. Our cylinders expand way more than US domestic iron/steel bores.

All makes sense now, thanks all for your comments.

andy

Old 03-12-2020, 02:51 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #7 (permalink)
Reply


 


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:20 AM.


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page
 

DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.