![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Carlos, CA US
Posts: 5,514
|
One head is 0.005 inch (0.125mm) lower than the other 2
I have a 72 911S engine with one head that is just a tad lower than the other two by 0.125mm. Is there any possibility of damaging the cam if I use it that way?
__________________
Porsche 2005 GT3, 2006 997S with bore-scoring Exotic: Ferrari F360F1 TDF, Ferrari 328 GTS Disposable Car: BMW 530xiT, 2008 Mini Cooper S Two-wheel art: Ducati 907IE, Ducati 851 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
.0049" is a lot . I would think that will cause too much interference in the cam tower .
What makes a well built 911 engine is the art of getting all of the measurements in sync . I would not allow that measurement to stand in one of my builds . I hope this helps Ian
__________________
Kermit, 73 RS clone, Just Part of the Team Chris Leydon ,Louis Baldwin ,Peter Brock ,Riche Clark Jerry Sherman ,Rob McGlade ,Donnie Deal Hank Clarkson ,Craig Waldner ,Don Kean ,Leroy Axel Gains |
||
![]() |
|
abit off center
|
How are you measuring? Together on the engine? could be the case, cylinder or head that's off?
__________________
______________________ Craig G2Performance Twinplug, head work, case savers, rockers arms, etc. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,237
|
I remember a number of .003'' as the limit, but depends on how worn out are the cam shafts and housings. As stated above, in which piece does the problem lie. What ever, you need to fix that. Bows the housing, creates odd stresses and oil leaks.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 1,367
|
i set them on a cylinder and measure to the cam tower sealing surface using a dial indicator. you don't get absolute thickness, just difference.
if that is really the case, you could get a 0.005" base cylinder shim for that head. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: So. Calif.
Posts: 19,910
|
Another option is to machine the remaining cylinder head mating surfaces so they all match. 0.0049” is barely renewing the mating/sealing surface. You also get a very slight bump in compression ratio. I’ve had all heads milled 0.040” to increase the CR, but you also have to take into consideration valve-to-piston clearance, valve lift, cam timing and any other “stack” mods (crankcase spigot, cylinder height).
Sherwood |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |