![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 170
|
Cam choice
I'm doing a "all from the stash" engine and have a choice of two cams: Rsr sprint and dc60. Here are the engine specs
Hot street engine. Redline: 7800 Sandcast alum case Rsr crank Carillo rods Elverude/Weiner (RIP) heads w titanium keepers and asse springs. 38mm ports. 2.9 andial p and c. 10.3 compression. Lightweight pins 930 pump. 935 oiling (centerlube and spray bar) Twin plug Again the two can choices are dc60 and Rsr sprint. Last edited by Geneulm; 11-26-2023 at 02:45 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 170
|
Sorry. Need to add if important. This is high butterfly mfi.
|
||
![]() |
|
It's a 914 ...
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ossining, NY
Posts: 4,703
|
You don't mention the use of the car. I'm not a professional builder, but for any street use at all, between those two I'd choose DC60. The factory RSR are very long duration, and I'd expect would need a lot of babying for around town driving.
For race only, perhaps a pro builder or someone with experience with both grinds can chime in. I'd think with a 7800 redline DC60 may still be a better choice since factory RSR grind peaked at 8000 in the 3.0L RSR. For a point of reference, I have a 2.7L race engine with similar specs overall and running Elgin 310-296, which is a little hotter than DC60. Lower RPM manners would be barely acceptable for any street use. It comes on the cam at 5000. Last edited by stownsen914; 11-26-2023 at 10:48 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 170
|
This will be a hot street engine
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Is your MFI pump matched to any of those cams or are you getting it reprofiled anyway?
__________________
Magnus 911 Silver Targa -77, 3.2 -84 with custom ITBs and EFI. 911T Coupe -69, 3.6, G50, "RSR", track day. 924 -79 Rat Rod EFI/Turbo 375whp@1.85bar. 931 -79 under total restoration. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I have a similar build in the works but with modern EFI and ITB and I went with a DC60 for my engine.
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 170
|
Two votes for dc60. None for sprints.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
|
I have the RSR Sprint Cams in my 72 street rod. Engine is a 3.1 liter, 66 x 100 on a 77 930 case. Compression is 11:1 twin plug, twin Bosch CDI's, 41mm intake ports with matching High Butterflies. Transmission is a 915 with the 8:31 later R&P and I have CN36's which are the 60 series so not very much low end torque.
Fun car to drive but stop & go traffic is No Fun at all. I am thinking about changing the cams to something between a DC-60 and DC-80. Go for the DC-60's Gene.
__________________
Mark Jung Bend, OR MFI Werks.com |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 870
|
Quote:
Did you ever dyno your 3.1? I just read your build thread, I don't think I saw a follow up describing performance. Best Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 170
|
Mark
Your comment means a lot. The success that some were reporting with sprint cams in short strokes was what got me thinking about using them... since I had a set in the stash. Sounds like dc60! |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,802
|
I have a 2.8 short stroke I ran with RSR Sprint cams for years. I found them surprisingly tractable on the street. The motor idled well and was easy to drive around town. The issue was that for that low speed tractability I had to run 38mm chokes or smaller in the PMO 46’s which prevented the motor from making the peak power it should have. It still spun to 8,000 rpm and was a blast, but in an effort to extract more of the motors potential I swapped to DC62 cams. The goal was to get a stronger idle signal through the carbs at low rpm’s to allow me to run bigger chokes and get more power up top. I had to drop redline from 8,000 to 7,500 but the motor was still a blast and more responsive in the 4-5000 rpm range.
Frankly I think both are great cams and are a lot of fun. That being said, now that I am converting my 2.8 to efi, and I don’t have to worry about compromises to get the carbs to work well on the street, I’m considering going back to the RSR cams to get that glorious rush to 8,000.
__________________
Brooke 1969 911 ST 2.8SS EFI ITB (Irish Green), 1974 911 3.6 ITB (Black) 1952 MG TD with F20C |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 170
|
Don't see things going to 8k+ with a long stroke. Just below, yes. Above no. Given Mark's comments, my transmission is relatively short. 7:34 r&p (954 part). Combined with SC 4th and 5th. Also have 7:37 in stash. Don't know if changes thoughts?
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,802
|
Gearing would definitely be an issue. I ran mine with a stock geared ‘69 901 transmission (AFMSZ with 7:31) which is relatively short gearing. I definitely would not pair it with an 8:31 trans unless it had a short gear stack in it as well.
__________________
Brooke 1969 911 ST 2.8SS EFI ITB (Irish Green), 1974 911 3.6 ITB (Black) 1952 MG TD with F20C |
||
![]() |
|
It's a 914 ...
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ossining, NY
Posts: 4,703
|
If you're running an SC 4th and 5th on a 7:31, I vote for this is fine for street use. A 28:23 fifth on 7:31 will give you about 3600 RPM at 60 mph. A little short if anything.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 170
|
Sc 4th and 5th on a 7:34. Shorter still. It's a hotrod; all about the acceleration.
|
||
![]() |
|
Try not, Do or Do not
|
Cam choice is perhaps the single most important choice when it comes to driving characteristics.
First decide what you want your engine to do, then build an engine with components that best offer those characteristics. If the choice is DC60 or RSR Sprint, your compatible components become pretty highly restricted. That said, you can use sprint cams with reasonable success if you're looking for a spirited street engine. Believe it or not, they can perform very well with reduced compression and advancing the cam timing. This will broaden the power band for more enjoyable street driving. 25 + years ago we set out to make a 2.8 liter short stroke engine with slide valve work on the street. We built a twin plug, with 9.8:1 compression which allowed us to do some tuning with timing advance. Remember, we were working with Ca. street gas 91 octane. The end result was a crazy fun 7800 rpm 300+ house power rocket. It was called the Red Sled. You might remember this engine from the cover of Wayne Dempsey's first addition Engine rebuild book. ![]() Quote:
__________________
Henry Schmidt SUPERTEC PERFORMANCE Ph: 760-728-3062 Email: supertec1@earthlink.net |
||
![]() |
|
Try not, Do or Do not
|
Quote:
__________________
Henry Schmidt SUPERTEC PERFORMANCE Ph: 760-728-3062 Email: supertec1@earthlink.net |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Thanks for sharing the story of the Red Sled, Henry. Milt Minter (RIP) was so good.
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
It's a 914 ...
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ossining, NY
Posts: 4,703
|
Quote:
In the race car (the one with the motor I mentioned in my earlier post), I have a 901 with GA, KA, O, S, U. Wouldn’t be very suitable for the street, but man is it glorious to drive. GA 18:32 KA 22:31 O 23:28 S 25:26 U 26:25 7:31 R&P |
||
![]() |
|
It's a 914 ...
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ossining, NY
Posts: 4,703
|
Quick note on the 2.9 93 mm P&C. I have those in my motor. When inbuilt it, I was advised that the cylinders are too thin for the standard CE style head gasket, and to have the heads and cylinders cut for ni-resist interlocking rings.
|
||
![]() |
|