|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 12
|
Questionable leak down test results
Hello all. I wanted to get your opinion on my leak down test results. I am having an issue with a small misfire. I have gone through the fuel and electrical systems. Wanted to follow through with a compression and leak down test.
Compression test came out good showing 150 psi average across all the cylinders with no more than 5 psi difference between the highest and lowest readings. I went ahead and did the leak down test and the results seem too good to be true. I got 0% on all cylinders. So naturally, I am a little skeptical of this. I am using a harbor freight leak down tester, which makes me question the accuracy of the tool. My procedure was I warmed up the engine and starting at cylinder number 1 I turned the engine over to top dead center. Removed the spark plug, inserted the hose adapter into the spark plug hole, attached the airline to the gauge and attach the gauge to the plug adapter. I aired all cylinders up to 80 psi. I listened for any air escaping through either the exhaust or the intake which I could not hear on any cylinder. As I went up in pressure and approached 80 PSI, I could hear some air escaping through the crank case via the oil dipstick/filler tube on all cylinders. After testing several cylinders and getting zero leakage I became a little curious. On the number 3 cylinder after performing the test at top dead center, I turned the crank pulley about halfway between cylinder 3 and 5. I turned the air up to 80 and at that time could hear a significant amount of air escaping through the exhaust and the leakage gauge was reading 15 psi. With this, I assume the gauges are working correctly. Even if they were off by a margin of five psi or so all of the cylinders would be in very good condition and are consistent. I would be ecstatic if those were the correct numbers, but I want make sure I’m not missing something. Edit: the car is a ‘74 911 base Last edited by timmay5; 11-09-2025 at 01:35 PM.. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 12
|
![]()
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
He got a couple of choices here:
1. Be blissfully excited that your Engine is in such good health. 2. Find a calibration lab in your area, and have those gauges calibrated. 3. Buy some high-end pre-calibrated pressure gauges and replace the ones that you have. Redo the test. Are you setting each piston at top dead center or the way I prefer to do it, bottom, dead center? By placing the piston at bottom, dead center, you can fill the cylinder and put your ear to the intake, the exhaust port, and the oil tank, to hear, which one is allowing more air to bypass without fighting the engine, turning over on you |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 12
|
All were done at TDC. Yeah, I was hesitant to buy the harbor Freight gauges. But I hate to spend a ton of money on a tool I’m likely only going to ever use once. I think my plan is I’m going to redo the test with the engine stone cold. With that, I would expect some amount of leakage. And assuming that the readings are equal across all cylinders at that point, I would feel confident enough to say that the first test was accurate.
|
||
|
|
|
|
PCA Member since 1988
|
How do you do a leak down test at BDC? The intake or exhaust valve should already be opening at BDC. No?
__________________
1973.5 911T with RoW 1980 SC CIS stroked to 3.2, 10:1 Mahle Sport p/c's, TBC exhaust ports, M1 cams, SSI's. RSR bushings & adj spring plates, Koni Sports, 21/26mm T-bars, stock swaybars, 16x7 Fuchs w Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+, 205/55-16 at all 4 corners. Cars are for driving. If you want art, get something you can hang on the wall! |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Quote:
I have never performed a leak down test on a Porsche engine. I have performed leaked down tests on a multitude of other engines, and the issue that has me can/will encounter is that at top dead center, when you supply 80 to 100 psi of air into the combustion chamber, the engine will want to rotate. Placing the piston at bottom, dead center prevents the engine from wanting to rotate |
||
|
|
|
|
|
PCA Member since 1988
|
Yes, I know the engine wants to rotate down from TDC, which is why it takes several tries (for me at least) to get it at exactly TDC, so it doesn't rotate.
I will wait to see if anyone else reports whether they do it at BDC, for the aforementioned reasons.
__________________
1973.5 911T with RoW 1980 SC CIS stroked to 3.2, 10:1 Mahle Sport p/c's, TBC exhaust ports, M1 cams, SSI's. RSR bushings & adj spring plates, Koni Sports, 21/26mm T-bars, stock swaybars, 16x7 Fuchs w Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+, 205/55-16 at all 4 corners. Cars are for driving. If you want art, get something you can hang on the wall! |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Quote:
But of all the different types of engines I’ve done this test on at bottom, dead center. I’ve never had to not struggle on the engines at top dead center. These are cooled, wonder mints are certainly magical, so I might be missing something. Once I get my engine reassembled, I will do some testing to confirm/deny my previous experiences. |
||
|
|
|
|
PCA Member since 1988
|
Here are the cam specs for the SC cam (also used in the Carrera engines). I used the 1982 SC to formulate the question for ChatGPT.
U.S./Canada (engine code 930/16): Intake lift at TDC overlap (with 0.10 mm valve lash): 1.4–1.7 mm Timing @ 1 mm valve lift (crank degrees): Intake 7° BTDC open / 47° ABDC close; Exhaust 49° BBDC open / 8° BTDC close Cam IDs (stamped on ends): LH 930.147.08 / RH 930.148.08. LSA: 113°. Duration: Intake 236°, exhaust 224°. This indicates to me that the exhaust valve opens before BDC after the power stroke, and the intake closes after BDC on the compression stroke. Thus, neither of the BDC points will hold pressure for a leak down test.
__________________
1973.5 911T with RoW 1980 SC CIS stroked to 3.2, 10:1 Mahle Sport p/c's, TBC exhaust ports, M1 cams, SSI's. RSR bushings & adj spring plates, Koni Sports, 21/26mm T-bars, stock swaybars, 16x7 Fuchs w Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 3+, 205/55-16 at all 4 corners. Cars are for driving. If you want art, get something you can hang on the wall! Last edited by PeteKz; 11-10-2025 at 10:55 PM.. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Quote:
__________________
Magnus 911 Silver Targa -77, 3.2 -84 with custom ITBs and EFI. 911T Coupe -69, 3.6, G50, "RSR", track day. 924 -79 Rat Rod EFI/Turbo 375whp@1.85bar. 931 -79 under total restoration. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Leak Down Test……
Quote:
How could you properly evaluate a Leak Down Test result with an open valve. The goal for a Leak Down Test is determine how a particular cylinder could hold the test pressure. The leak down test has specific instruction: Test done @ TDC. Use a flywheel lock to keep the crankshaft from turning during test. Tony |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 1,375
|
Here's a way I've checked my leak down checker... What you really care about is that both gauges read the same, not that they both read exactly 100 psi at a calibrated 100 psi.
Find a way to "plug" the hose (or port) that goes to the cylinder. Crank up the pressure and see how close the two gauges read. If they're reading the same you're good. Or if they're not (assuming they're reasonably close), you can take that into account when doing the leakdown test. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Every cylinder leak down apparatus has a calibrated orifice that leaks some of the compressed air out, by design. The ID of the orifice is determined by the cylinder bore size that you will be testing. Leak down testers in the aviation industry are sold with one orifice or another, based upon the range of piston bore diameters that you will be using the tester on. I am very curious about the HF tester- is it for a small engine or motorcycle bore ranges? Also, when the test is conducted, to be perfectly accurate, you must correct your reading for ambient pressure. If you are well above sea level, that will affect the test… but typically, not by a massive amount.
Test should always be performed at TDC. It is best to have an assistant to hold the engine at TDC. Some aviation cylinders are “choked” (they have a smaller bore at the top of the cylinder). Regardless, we are primarily concerned with ring sealing at the top of the compression stroke. As mentioned above, your ears are the most important tool during the leak down testing process- discovering where the air escapes from, gives you the info you need to fix a low cylinder. If you disconnect the HF tool from the engine and run 80psi through it, what does the cylinder pressure gauge read? Should be zero. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 12
|
It is an automotive tester, not small engine. It has adapters for various spark plug sizes. Correct, the leakage side reads zero if pressurized but not connected. I believe the gauges to be accurate. They were not cheap by Harbor Freight standards,$90. They look the same or are a very good copy of the OTC brand gauges I have seen several others referencing.
![]() ![]() I repeated the test on a cold engine. Noted a small difference in a 5 psi drop across all cylinders at 80 psi. I am at sea level, so no adjustment should need to be made there. One thing I forgot to mention was the engine had a top end rebuild between 30k miles ago. Which is what I am attributing the good numbers to. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
I did a test on my engine a few years ago, it had maybe 50.000 miles on a top end rebuild, unknown miles on the rings. It had basically zero leakage.
I tried it on another engine with a fresh rebuild and large ring gap for boost, it showed leakage on that engine.
__________________
Magnus 911 Silver Targa -77, 3.2 -84 with custom ITBs and EFI. 911T Coupe -69, 3.6, G50, "RSR", track day. 924 -79 Rat Rod EFI/Turbo 375whp@1.85bar. 931 -79 under total restoration. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: mt. vernon Wa. USA
Posts: 8,752
|
tolerance spec
your reading can only be as accurate as the gauge and the gauges are often spec'd with a +/-2% tolerance........but, even if all of your 0% readings were really 2%.......still excellent leak-down results.
__________________
[B]Current projects: 69-911.5, Previous:73 911X (off to SanFrancisco/racing in Germany).77 911S (NY), 71E (France/Corsica), 66-912 ( France), 1970 914X (Wisconsin) 76 911S roller..off to Florida/Germany RGruppe #669 http://www.x-faktory.com/ |
||
|
|
|