![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
It actually sounds like the Kuglefischer MFI system that BMW used for their 1.5 liter F1 Turbo engine. That too was an "electronically controlled" MFI system.
__________________
John '69 911E "It's a poor craftsman who blames their tools" -- Unknown "Any suspension -- no matter how poorly designed -- can be made to work reasonably well if you just stop it from moving." -- Colin Chapman |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: City of Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,374
|
This is a way cool idea, guys. Be sure to post here as you work on these projects.
Quote:
__________________
Andy |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: City of Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,374
|
Quote:
__________________
Andy |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: montreal, Canada
Posts: 337
|
One thing that would be useful to make progress would be an old MFI pump that I could take apart and use as a mule for things that will need to be fabricated.
If anyone knows of one for sale, please let me know. I'll pay a reasonnable amount for an old pump, does'nt need to be an actual working one. I'll also post on the classifieds. Michel Richard michrich@videotron.ca |
||
![]() |
|
Try not, Do or Do not
|
Quote:
41 mm butterly, stacks, linkage and custom fuel lines. ![]() ![]()
__________________
Henry Schmidt SUPERTEC PERFORMANCE Ph: 760-728-3062 Email: supertec1@earthlink.net |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 310
|
Henry
What has been done to the pump? It looks seriously modded Neven |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: City of Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,374
|
Quote:
__________________
Andy |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 341
|
Have you seen this before?
http://www.pelicanparts.com/techarticles/911_MFI/Bosch%20_More_MFI_Repair_Instructions.pdf
__________________
72 Porsche 911T/E Targa 72 Porsche 911S 85 BMW 735i |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 310
|
Yes but I'm not sure what 'adjustment distance' means and if it is the rack position it seems stange that it appears to not be directly related to delivery volume ie Under part load
400rpm, 4.4mm = 12.5-13.5 and 3000rpm, 3.8mm = 12.5-13.5 So it seems to be a measurement before the space cam, what I want is measurement after the cam, ie the rack movement Neven |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 143
|
Henry,
-Does that include the MFI pump? -Will the stock '72 air cleaner fit? -Is this a good "street" setup? - What other changes will this require to maintain the "stock" 911T driveabilityand performance? -Stock fuel pump? -Will the idle-speed adjustment, etc still be required? Terry Hastings
__________________
Terry Hastings Baltimore, MD 1972 911T LTHSURVEY@AOL.com |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: City of Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,374
|
Terry, maybe you know this but those stacks are for a bigger motor. I believe that the motor pictured is a 3.5 race motor. I also don't think that the MFI pump is included; this is just the induction. For 2.7 or less you can use OEM parts, depending on your RPM (high RPM motors need more air, of course).
__________________
Andy |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
Quote:
Here's a picture that I found on the web, but unfortunately it seems that the pump was mounted under the intakes and so is almost never pictured. ![]()
__________________
John '69 911E "It's a poor craftsman who blames their tools" -- Unknown "Any suspension -- no matter how poorly designed -- can be made to work reasonably well if you just stop it from moving." -- Colin Chapman Last edited by jluetjen; 08-06-2004 at 01:32 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: City of Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,374
|
wow John, that is very cool. Thank you for putting that post together. It seems that even modern EFI could not deliver the fuel in such a short time, perhaps only the new common rail diesel injection is in this ball-park for a fully electronic system (just a guess, but it runs at much higher pressures than gas EFI).
__________________
Andy |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: montreal, Canada
Posts: 337
|
I'm not sure I understand what is meant by a "spiral" in this case. I read that the servo motor acts on this "spiral" . . . is it really like the rack that is found in our Bosch pumps ?
It looks more and more like Neven's idea of a servo motor acting directly on the main rack is the way to go, as opposed to a motor (servo or stepper) acting on the little lever that the normal MFI thermostat acts on. The more I think about it, the more Neven's idea sounds better. The force to move the rack is quite small, I believe: the repair book says to use a "biro" to move the rack, using only very little pressure to see if it's stuck. I suppose the force required could be greater when the engine is running, but there is no indication anywhere that that is so. Certainly, the force required at the gas pedal does not appear to be any different between a carbed car and an MFI car, and the force required to move the "fuel" lever on the pump when the engine is running is small. Can't wait to lay my hands on a "play" pump to do some real figuring. None on ebay right now, though. Michel Richard |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
Anyhow, here's an explosion of the key MFI components: ![]() Note how the back and forth movement of the rack (#9) rotates the plunger assembly (#7 via #8). The way that this rotational movement varies the fuel volume pumped by the plunger assembly is as follows: ![]() Note that the fuel flows in from the left and out the top. Notice how the spiral groove in the plunger can vary the actual closing event based how the plunger is indexed. Examples #1 through #3 shows the plunger alignment for starting (full rich) when the groove never sees the port on the left as the plunger moves up and down. As a result a full stroke of fuel is injected out of the injector. Example number #4 through #7 show the plunger alignment under normal operation. While the plunger stroke is the same, the groove on the side of the plunger can delay the actual closing event by upwards to half of a stroke, kind up like a long duration cam can reduce the CR of an engine. The result is less fuel is pumped out of the nozzle. Now going back to the BMW example imagine that you pitch everything in the first picture before the control rack head (#2) and replace it with a stepper motor and computer. What would happen if the minimum adjustment step of the motor was too large compared to the required adjustment on the rack? You'd most likely find that will flutter back and forth between the two closest steps. Instead, picture a threaded screw pushing against the control rack head and the motor turns the screw. This would allow virtually limitless adjustment of the rack based on the pitch of the screw and the rotational speed of the motor. I suspect that this is the type of arrangement which the BMW engineer was describing.
__________________
John '69 911E "It's a poor craftsman who blames their tools" -- Unknown "Any suspension -- no matter how poorly designed -- can be made to work reasonably well if you just stop it from moving." -- Colin Chapman Last edited by jluetjen; 08-07-2004 at 04:53 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 310
|
John
Firstly they used a 'servo' and not a 'stepper', Servos are analoque, so wouldn't have a discrete increment. The spiral would be how they converted the rotational position of servo to the linear position of the rack, AFAIK Bosch own Kugelfischer. The Futaba Servos have a response time of 0.2s for a 60 degree change, I think this will be responsive enough Neven |
||
![]() |
|