![]() |
What cylinders are you using with the 89mm J.E pistons? I am looking to go the same route but am unsure about sleeved cylinders.
Robert |
P+C______________89mm_______90mm________92mm
Displacement _____2466cc_______2519cc_______2634cc Spigot____________97mm_______97mm________97mm CR_______________10.5_________7.0__________10.5 Price____________$3400________$1800________$3400 Take your pick. |
BTW Andial has a high compression 90 mm 2.7 kit that nominally is 10.3:1 as a 2.7 on 70.4 mm stroke, comes out ~9.7:1 on a 66 mm crank and 2519 cc.
|
I was lucky and had some old 89mm cylinders re plated.
|
Do the 92 mm RSR pistons require a special cylinder head machining cut to use with 2.4/2.7 heads or are people lowering CR with base gaskets alone?
|
New to the BBS, so go easy on me. :)
Just a thought on the 2.5 short stroke motor using the RS pistons. 7:1 compression seems ideal for a blown motor (This is roughly the CR of a 3.3 turbo motor). Has anyone out there ever considered/attempted super/turbocharging a 7R cased motor? You'd obviously need to sort the MFI or carbs appropriately and swap in a no overlap cam, but seems doable. This idea has always been a pipe dream of mine, although I have obviously never tried it. |
Welcome.
Not too many have built turbo cars on a mag case, a few with 2.7 CIS cars. one of the big advantages of RS pistons is valve clearance for big cams. you could probably build a very powerful motor if you had a racing class that allowed 2.5 + turbo. For street or something, I think you'd be better off starting with a 930 motor. most people don't run too hot of cams with a turbo anyway. |
Quote:
A small displacement turbo is one of my dream motors. 2.5 using the low compression of the Mahle P&Cs on an aluminum case, 2.2 crank & rods, big oil pump, Supertec headstuds, Carrera manifold and motronic ECU w/knock sensor. Thats all I could figure out on my own though. Researching this stuff made my head hurt and I came to the conclusion that it was going to take someone a lot smarter than me to figure the rest of the motor specifics out. Goran forwarded me a couple of websites on turbo charger maps, etc, in response to the link above. I'll see if I can find them. |
Quote:
|
I was thinking almost exactly in line w/ Shuie, except I am preferential to using a supercharger, specifically the Eaton unit out of a C230 Mercedes. It is perfectly sized for a 2.5L flat six. I have seen plenty of 3.2 installs using an Eaton roots type supercharger, integrating it with a serpentine belt running off of the crank. There is just something about not interrupting that beautiful exhaust note with a turbo...
I also agree with Shuie on another thing: the research is making my head hurt. I figure the case would have to be aluminum (but am not 100% sure), boat tailed and shuffle pinned with all Raceware or Arp hardware. Stock rods would probably be a no-no. Twin plugs, pretty much a must. Piston squirters installed if none exist. An intercooler would have to be involved. Cam would need to have minimal overlap (3.0/3.3 turbo unit?). I also like the idea of a Carrera or 3.3 Turbo manifold, but the cost of a Motec w/ crankfire is brutal. Then again, the programability of the Motec in the long run (and the tunability a Lambda/knock sensor provide) would probably pay for itself in the labor you'd save trying to figure out all of that stuff without data acquisition. I belive that you can get the Motec brain with a boost sender, too. My biggest question is how much of a beating can the lower end of an early motor take? If you have a 2.5L motor churning out 260-270HP, it makes no sense to build it if the bottom end goes sloppy in 20K miles. Thoughts? |
interesting ideas, but I stand by the assertion that starting with a 3.3 turbo motor would be cheaper and more powerful. If you have some odd-ball racing class to fit into it's a different deal.
|
Quote:
This isn't for an oddball racing class; it would be a street motor. Unfortunately, I'm just an oddball with a penchant for the unusual. Just knowing myself, I'd never be happy with a 3.0/3.3 turbo in there. Anyone can swap in a factory motor, but a one-off lump is a conversation piece that never gets old. Then again, it could become a headache that never goes away... |
I understand, we're on the same page. you're probably talking about over $10k even if you DIY the rebuild, though.
And there is a lot of fun stuff you can do with a 3.0/3.3, or even an SC base, with custom pistons, induction, injection, exhaust. But I understand where you are coming from. |
i dream of a 3.0RS
3.0 longblock...swap out the pistons with high comp Mahles throw away the CIS have a 911S MFI system bored and rebuilt for a 3.0 Brun-Bros RSR dual dizzy longevity with the sturdy case...displacement, there is no replacement...and a rare motor that not many people out there have that is my plan |
Quote:
|
yes, yes, yes, there are a a lot of fun motors we could build. The 3.0 RS with MFI would be another great one. Lets get back to NA 2.5s and 2.6s though.
The 10.3:1 90mm Mahle pistons sound real interesting. Id never heard of those before. Are they as difficult to find and as expensive as the high compression 89mm P&Cs are? edit: just called Andial and they have a set of these on the shelf :cool: |
Quote:
|
me too 82SC except I would use TWM 3003s, megasquirt, and coil packs, twin plug of course. loses some "sex appeal" but gains a few things too.
Cheers, |
Since we talking NA motors (sorry for co-opting the thread :) ), has anybody seen one of these mean motors? 66mm stroke, 2.8L motor (95mm cyl), 9.5 CR, twin plugs, 300HP, 8600 RPM, pump gas:
http://www.supertecperformance.com/wild-porsche-engine.phtml Gives me shivers! |
yes, love it. Grady Clay is a big fan of this type of configuration, he has built many.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website