Pelican Parts
Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   Pelican Parts Forums > 1- Porsche Technical Forums > 911 Engine Rebuilding Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Reply
Registered User
 
camgrinder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: California
Posts: 921
Walt,
Thanks for sharing all that info. Very cool.
__________________
John Dougherty
Dougherty Racing Cams
Old 09-28-2005, 08:13 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #41 (permalink)
drag racing the short bus
 
dd74's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Location, Location...
Posts: 21,980
Quote:
Originally posted by Walt Fricke
So gears matter for performance, if acceleration is the measure of it. Of course they don't make the engine more powerful, but they get the most that it has to give. Isn't that what dd is saying?
Yes, Walt: this is exactly what I've been saying. Which in and of itself could potentially make an SC engine as potent as if some of the discussed modifications in this thread were employed. However, the effectiveness of a 7.31 r/p also depends on where that r/p is used. On a short, twisty track, it would be very effective. On a track with long straights, not as much...
Old 09-28-2005, 08:48 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #42 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 743
Hello all.

I entirely agree that closing up the gears can keep the engine in a narrower rev band: exactly as Walt has described.

The drop in BHP below peak is therefore less both over- and under-peak HP.

But what dd and I are discussing is not closing up the rev band between changes: we are discussing simply changing the R+P.

This has no effect on the revs drop between gears....only on the road speed at which those changes occur..

BTW, a lot of confusion arises with respect to terms like BHP, torque and thrust...all that really matters is rear wheel bhp at any particular road speed.

Kind regards
David
Old 09-28-2005, 11:14 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #43 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 743
Hello, John.

You asked about actual ratios.

So I had a quick look at my charts.

To take the specific case of Walt's stockish SC..

The stock box has an 8/31 R+P, ratios probably 18/32, 23/29, 26/26, 28/23.

Looking at a chart for stock tyre sizes power curve, we can see that shifting at 6000 rpm we get shifts from second at 65mph, 4th at 91 mph, fifth at 115 mph, and run out at 140..

The HP at 6000 looks to be about 160.

Revs on the new gear are 3rd 4500, 4th 4800, 5th 5000

So each shift gives HP of third 157, 4th 164, 5th 167 from the dyno curve.
OK, now with the 7/31 R+P.

The shift MPH are reduced: 65 to 57, 91 to 80, 115 to 101 140 to 123.

But the revs and HP numbers at shift are the same of course..


Now, the really accurate way to calculate the effective power applied when going up through the gears is to integrate the HP curve against time...including of course the shifts when no power is applied, and the time taken for the engine to recover from the upset when the throttle is shut...but that is not really needed here, to answer our question..

"What will be the effect on acceleration of a lower R+P?"

Answer, you say (and I agree) the acceleration in each gear will be greater...why?..The HP available at the wheels is the same ..

Its because the drag (aero, tyre etc) are lower because the car is moving slower..

Yes, I say, but what I'm really looking for is acceleration at a particular speed...

And the answer to that is to be found by plotting the HP against road speed with 7:31 , and putting that curve over the numbers with the 8:31.
And obviously we will see that at some speeds the HP available is higher with the 7;31, and at others with the 8:31..

So, for example, at 80 mph the 8:31 gives 5,400 rpm, and about 168 hp, and 7:31 6000 and 160hp.

While at 90 mph, the 8:31 gives 5900, 161HP ( 3rd gear) and ,while 7:31 is 5600 (in 4th gear) and About 167HP...

Kind regards
David
Old 09-29-2005, 02:15 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #44 (permalink)
Registered User
 
sammyg2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 45,909
Everyone is talking horsepower, but gearing is related to torque, not HP.
At a low gear you have lots O'torque. the longer it lasts (wide torque band) the longer you can accelerate hard. If it lasts to the high revs, you have lots O'horsepower. But that means absolutely nothing if the available torque is really low at lower revs and it only there from 5000 to 5600 rpm. If you can get the torque to come on early and stay all the way to the higher rpm range, you have a very good, very fast, very useable engine. That is not easy to do.
In second gear, you have effectively reduced the torque to the rear wheels.
If the second gear is lower, you reduced it less but also reduced the amount of time you will spend accelerating in the higher regions of the torque band. third gear reduces the torque to the rear wheels even further.
the width of the torque band, the gearing, and the time it takes to shift, all determine if a lower overall ratio will benefit or hurt the rate of acceleration.
Old 10-03-2005, 07:51 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #45 (permalink)
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

 


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:10 PM.


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2018 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page
 

DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.