![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Up North
Posts: 1,449
|
![]()
Bckground - SC cam used in a 3.4L 930.
What would be the effect of timing it more retarded, say around 1.35mm vs advanced, say around 1.6mm? Would it affect how "freely" the engine likes to rev? How fast the turbo might create boost? thanks.
__________________
87 930 K27HFS/B&B/Twin-Plug... Megasquirted ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
resident samsquamch
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cooterville, Cackalacky
Posts: 6,815
|
I hate to refer you to your own thread:
Camshaft timing question As I posted before, I was told by Neil Harvey of Performance Devlopments that when he performed the dry assembly mach-up of my engine to check for piston to valve clearance, etc., he indicated that 1.7MM was the optimal cam timing for *MY* particular engine on the street. I ended up using 1.65MM.
__________________
-jeff back in the saddle: '95 993 - just another black C2 *SOLD*: '87 930 GP White - heroin would have been a cheaper addiction... "Ladies and Gentlemen, from Boston Massachusetts, we are Morphine, at your service..." - Mark Sandman (RIP ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Up North
Posts: 1,449
|
Well... I did recall & re-read that thread.
Reason for another post is: I intentionally retard my CAM after that post and what I'm seeing is NOT what its supposed to be. The engine seems out of breath and my boost comes on waaaaayyyyy later. Hence want to re-ask the question. I know each engine is different, but I think someone (DonE?) had tried different settings on same CAM - hoping to hear from someone. Sandman, how did you know 1.65mm/1.7mm is optimal for your engine? What does optimal mean in this case? thanks.
__________________
87 930 K27HFS/B&B/Twin-Plug... Megasquirted ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
resident samsquamch
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cooterville, Cackalacky
Posts: 6,815
|
Quote:
How did Neil know to advise about 1.7MM? I guess years of building and designing serious race engines gives a person that sort of "feel".
__________________
-jeff back in the saddle: '95 993 - just another black C2 *SOLD*: '87 930 GP White - heroin would have been a cheaper addiction... "Ladies and Gentlemen, from Boston Massachusetts, we are Morphine, at your service..." - Mark Sandman (RIP ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
resident samsquamch
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Cooterville, Cackalacky
Posts: 6,815
|
Hobie, I'm not sure if you're on Rennlist under a different user name, but here are some recent threads about re-timing cams with the engine in the car:
http://forums.rennlist.com/rennforums/showthread.php?t=296000 http://forums.rennlist.com/rennforums/showthread.php?t=294289&page=4
__________________
-jeff back in the saddle: '95 993 - just another black C2 *SOLD*: '87 930 GP White - heroin would have been a cheaper addiction... "Ladies and Gentlemen, from Boston Massachusetts, we are Morphine, at your service..." - Mark Sandman (RIP ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Up North
Posts: 1,449
|
Thanks for the reference to Rennlist... I was thinking about re-checking the cam timing as well; though I also learnt from my last rebuild that to get the same # again, you need to clamp the chain (for the left side) just like when it was first installed. This is the part that can't be done easily with the engine in the car
![]() As for 1.7mm vs others, I was just curious if anyone can describe the results of deviating from "optimal". I think I understand what should happen, but what about reality?
__________________
87 930 K27HFS/B&B/Twin-Plug... Megasquirted ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Rate This Thread | |
|