![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mount Airy, MD
Posts: 4,299
|
Measuring bearing clearences
Ok, so I know of two ways to determine rod and main bearing clearance...
1. Torque up rod or case, measure with dial bore gauge. Measure bearing thickness with a cone anvil mike. Measure journal with flat anvil mike. Do math. 2. Insert bearings, torque rods or case. Measure with dial bore gauge. Measure crank. Subtract. I've always done #1 cause I always end up digging a ditch in the bearing (never fails ![]() I've also been told that proper clearance isn't measured unless the bearing is under crush since they are designed slightly egg till crushed. Thoughts anyone... No, plastigauge is not acceptable ![]() Tadd
__________________
1967 912 with centerlocks… 10 years and still in pieces! |
||
![]() |
|
Ubi bene ibi patria
|
Bump!
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 11,552
|
What's wrong with plastigage?
__________________
Tom Butler 1973 RSR Clone 1970 911E 914-6 GT Recreation in Process |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mount Airy, MD
Posts: 4,299
|
Tom:
Plastigauge can be all over the place. The manufacture of the string itself is pretty accurate, but there is a lot of noise in the 'squishing' and 'reading'. There have been a lot of articles on this topic... one link for your viewing pleasure. Plastigage Versus Micrometer - Accuracy Test - Car Craft Magazine tadd
__________________
1967 912 with centerlocks… 10 years and still in pieces! |
||
![]() |
|
abit off center
|
Those bore gauges are good but its really an art to using them. You could have guys measure the same bore and come up with 5 different readings too.
__________________
______________________ Craig G2Performance Twinplug, head work, case savers, rockers arms, etc. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 825
|
i have built many a engine with plastigage no problems works for me
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Doc Speed
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 224
|
I agree with Craig. I bring my cases to an engine builder. He doesn't do Porsche engines but he's been using a bore gauge for decades on the stuff he does rebuild. Well worth the few sheckles.
__________________
- Neil '67 911S (Ol' Ivory) '82 Hewlett Packard 34C |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 7,007
|
Quote:
![]() ![]()
__________________
Steve Weiner Rennsport Systems Portland Oregon (503) 244-0990 porsche@rennsportsystems.com www.rennsportsystems.com |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 4,612
|
I will be getting my crank and newly line bored case back from Competition Engineering in the next couple of weeks. Is it everyone's consensus that I still need to, at the very least, use plastigauge to measure clearances? I know Wayne's book says it is a must, but I would like to know about real world scenarios.
Thanks, Neil
__________________
Neil '73 911S targa |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mount Airy, MD
Posts: 4,299
|
No matter who did the work, YOU should always double check.
Reputation does not completetly eliminate human error. It is your dollars in the end.... ![]() tadd
__________________
1967 912 with centerlocks… 10 years and still in pieces! |
||
![]() |
|