Pelican Parts
Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   Pelican Parts Forums > Porsche Forums > 911 Engine Rebuilding Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Reply
Registered
 
Sigurd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Norway / Merritt Island FL
Posts: 220
SC cams in a 73.5?

I am fixing some oil leaks on a 2.4 with CIS, a 73.5. I also have two 3 bearing SC grind cams that I have not found use for. Should I take the opportunity to swap the cams? Drawbacks?

__________________
Sigurd
73.5T 3.2SS EFI
X87 944S 3.0
Old 06-09-2014, 04:51 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #1 (permalink)
Registered
 
E Sully's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 3,974
Garage
In my reading, I hve only seen the 2.7 S cams as a recommended upgrade for the 73.5 cis.
2.7S CIS
Left 911 105 143 00
Right 911 105 144 00
__________________
Ed
1973.5 T
Old 06-09-2014, 05:44 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #2 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Nash County, NC.
Posts: 8,500
The lobes on an SC cam are too large to fit into the 3 bearing cam. What ever you have for SC has got to be inquestion.
2.7 S cams work well on that engine but youre limited on compression at 8.0 CR
Bruce
Old 06-09-2014, 07:04 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3 (permalink)
Registered
 
JmuRiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 1,124
Garage
I've head or SC grind working well on the 2.7 with CIS, but I'm not sure about the 2.4. Personally they are seem similar enough to work, but I'd let an expert chime in.
__________________
'73 2.0 914 (2.8 /6 conversion in progress)
'64 356SC
'65 Ducati Falcon 80
‘19 Audi SQ5
Old 06-09-2014, 11:18 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #4 (permalink)
up-fixing der car(ma)
 
YTNUKLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 3,762
Garage
Send a message via AIM to YTNUKLR
The cam duration (degrees) for SC cams and early 911E cams is very similar actually.

I would expect these would be somewhat similar to a 911E in terms of powerband which is a great street/sport combo.

Of course, the SC lobe separation ("Lobe Center") is much "wider" at 113° vs. 102°, which basically just means it will work well with a single-throttle-body system like CIS, whereas the early 911E cam won't (well).

flat6pac (Bruce)- you're correct; a 4-bearing cam lobe is too large to fit inside a 3-bearing early housing. However, if a 3-bearing cam is ground down on the backside ("reduced base circle"), the cam can have the same lift as the SC profile.

I actually had some cams made similar to this (actually a 964C2 profile on a 3-bearing cam), although I haven't put them in anything yet. Anyone want to try them out (they could be available as I have no use for them right now)?

The downside to putting a more aggressive cam in a motor that is low-po like a 911T is the compression is really not enough. You can be happy that you can run it on the lowest octane gas I would venture to guess you would be happier with a 2.7S CIS cam in a 2.4CIS motor, which is about 20° less total duration, and maintains better compression, and is still a nice profile for a street car.
__________________
Scott Kinder
kindersport @ gmail.com
Old 06-09-2014, 05:04 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #5 (permalink)
Registered
 
bgyglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,653
I have a question. If one were to go high compression with custom JE pistons, maybe 86mm, could it be more feasible to run SC cams? I was actually planning a high comp CIS 2.4-2.5 with 2.7S cams but I would really like to go with SCs if they will work successfully. I'm aiming for a street/DE hot rod motor. I know most would suggest changing intake to carbs etc but I really want the stock appearance etc.
__________________
70T 2.7RS spec.
68L coupe
Old 06-14-2014, 05:06 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #6 (permalink)
 
up-fixing der car(ma)
 
YTNUKLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fremont, CA
Posts: 3,762
Garage
Send a message via AIM to YTNUKLR
Yes, higher compression with the SC cam should 'fix' it. Perhaps 9.3:1 or so. More if you have twin plug.
Old 06-14-2014, 10:48 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #7 (permalink)
Registered
 
Sigurd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Norway / Merritt Island FL
Posts: 220
Thank you for the inputs. I will go with the stock cams on this one.

__________________
Sigurd
73.5T 3.2SS EFI
X87 944S 3.0
Old 06-15-2014, 11:17 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #8 (permalink)
Reply


 


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:13 PM.


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page
 

DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.