Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   911 Engine Rebuilding Forum (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/911-engine-rebuilding-forum/)
-   -   Help Me to Identify These Heads? (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/911-engine-rebuilding-forum/882544-help-me-identify-these-heads.html)

tom1394racing 09-10-2015 12:05 PM

Help Me to Identify These Heads?
 
I have this set of heads in my stash and I am stumped in trying to figure out the application.

Casting # 901-104-306-2R
Casting date - 2&3/70
Casting type - K1819d
Ports - 32/33
Valves - 42/38

They would seem to be 914-6 2.0 liter heads except they they are machined to fit 84mm cylinders. I am guessing that smaller combustion chamber in the 2.0 head would give a nice CR boost for a 2.2 or 2.4 build but I would think that the small valves and ports offset the CR boost.

Anybody ever seen anything like these?

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1441911853.jpg

Dpmulvan 09-10-2015 12:24 PM

There 2.0 liter 911 heads

Dpmulvan 09-10-2015 12:25 PM

1969 911t

Dpmulvan 09-10-2015 12:33 PM

or 1970

tom1394racing 09-10-2015 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dpmulvan (Post 8789000)
There 2.0 liter 911 heads

That is what I thought at first. Except that cylinder-to-head sealing surface is machined to accept an 84 mm 2.2/2.4 cylinder not the 80 mm 2.0 cylinder.

Henry Schmidt 09-10-2015 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tom1394racing (Post 8789033)
That is what I thought at first. Except that cylinder-to-head sealing surface is machined to accept an 84 mm 2.2/2.4 cylinder not the 80 mm 2.0 cylinder.

Machining 2.0 heads to fit 84 mm cylinders was/is done all the time.
Back in the day, 2.0 pistons and cylinders were more expensive than the 84 mm Ps&Cs and by this simple machine process you ended up with "more power" because of increased size.
Compression becomes a problem because the increased diameter required a slight chamfer be machined in the head to mate the cylinder to the chamber.
Then there's the issue of the deeper chamber (1.75mm) on the 2.0 head and it has a different valve angle.
All told not a great conversion. That is why we invented the 81mm cylinder with the 84mm sealing surface.
The result is a more stable platform and no compatibility problems.
We also reproduce the 906 cooling tin to ensure that these cylinders with increased cooling fins operate at the correct temperature.
The net thing is to increase the valve size from 38/42 to 39/45 69 2.0 "S".



http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1441918156.jpg
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1441918178.jpg
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1441918301.jpg

tom1394racing 09-10-2015 02:20 PM

Thanks for chiming in Henry

I figured you would have the answer.

Dpmulvan 09-10-2015 02:46 PM

Seems he be the man


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.