![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 11,565
|
Help Me to Identify These Heads?
I have this set of heads in my stash and I am stumped in trying to figure out the application.
Casting # 901-104-306-2R Casting date - 2&3/70 Casting type - K1819d Ports - 32/33 Valves - 42/38 They would seem to be 914-6 2.0 liter heads except they they are machined to fit 84mm cylinders. I am guessing that smaller combustion chamber in the 2.0 head would give a nice CR boost for a 2.2 or 2.4 build but I would think that the small valves and ports offset the CR boost. Anybody ever seen anything like these? ![]()
__________________
Tom Butler 1973 RSR Clone 1970 911E 914-6 GT Recreation in Process |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 13,913
|
There 2.0 liter 911 heads
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 13,913
|
1969 911t
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 13,913
|
or 1970
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 11,565
|
That is what I thought at first. Except that cylinder-to-head sealing surface is machined to accept an 84 mm 2.2/2.4 cylinder not the 80 mm 2.0 cylinder.
__________________
Tom Butler 1973 RSR Clone 1970 911E 914-6 GT Recreation in Process |
||
![]() |
|
Try not, Do or Do not
|
Quote:
Back in the day, 2.0 pistons and cylinders were more expensive than the 84 mm Ps&Cs and by this simple machine process you ended up with "more power" because of increased size. Compression becomes a problem because the increased diameter required a slight chamfer be machined in the head to mate the cylinder to the chamber. Then there's the issue of the deeper chamber (1.75mm) on the 2.0 head and it has a different valve angle. All told not a great conversion. That is why we invented the 81mm cylinder with the 84mm sealing surface. The result is a more stable platform and no compatibility problems. We also reproduce the 906 cooling tin to ensure that these cylinders with increased cooling fins operate at the correct temperature. The net thing is to increase the valve size from 38/42 to 39/45 69 2.0 "S". ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Henry Schmidt SUPERTEC PERFORMANCE Ph: 760-728-3062 Email: supertec1@earthlink.net Last edited by Henry Schmidt; 09-10-2015 at 01:56 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 11,565
|
Thanks for chiming in Henry
I figured you would have the answer.
__________________
Tom Butler 1973 RSR Clone 1970 911E 914-6 GT Recreation in Process |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 13,913
|
Seems he be the man
|
||
![]() |
|