Quote:
Originally Posted by Laneco
OK, based on what you guys are telling me, it is possible depending on the server protocol for emails to be erased. For instance, when I was working at a large company a few years ago, the company had its own servers. Company email did indeed disappear - guaranteed. So that company server must have been similar in nature to what you are describing.
But the copies that I had loaded into my computer hard drive did not disappear nor did the backup that I store in a remote hard drive (my aww-**** contingency). No matter what happened, I had those and they proved to be most valuable on a couple of occasions...
So how did Clinton make all of those disappear for everyone who had received them and stored them either on a laptop hard drive, or backed up onto a remote hard drive? I realize that gov't employees are not supposed to back up items to remote hard drives, but it DOES get done and not everyone of those 30,000 deleted emails went to a gov't person... How the heck did she do this?
*edit - was still typing when stomach monkey wrote in - thanks
angela
|
You've hit on my point.
There is a lot of talk about the number deleted and the assumption is that some or all of them were work related.
You don't have to find all 30K or even 5K to prove that.
You just need to find X out of 30k.
And that is absolutely doable.
It's unrealistic to think that out of a potential 30K not one of them hit a government system and there will absolutely be a record of it somewhere.
Unless they were not work related.