Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   crane tips over!! (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/1012264-crane-tips-over.html)

vash 11-05-2018 07:45 AM

crane tips over!!
 
wow!!

<iframe width="853" height="485" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/hGX-5eWfGVA" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Zeke 11-05-2018 07:48 AM

That was inexcusable. Someone looses their license.

GH85Carrera 11-05-2018 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeke (Post 10240106)
That was inexcusable. Someone looses their license.

I don't know beans about cranes, but I have agree. The weight of the load was know precisely. The positioning of the crane was set up wrong is the easy comment. I hope those guys on the ground all got out of there.

herr_oberst 11-05-2018 08:19 AM

This is why crane operators make the big bucks. It looks so easy when everything goes right.

Neilk 11-05-2018 08:23 AM

In the YouTube video comments, someone said they all got out fine.

I am not too familiar with cranes, but as an armchair commenter, don't the crane legs spread out more? Looks like they are fairly close in.

vash 11-05-2018 08:30 AM

i work around cranes all the time. they still scare the crap out of me.

in all my life, i have never seen a crane sit on such a nice surface as the one in the video.

looks like his outriggers were out..they couldnt get closer because of the bracing on the wall already up. that in my opinion is where they effed up. they should have done the furthest ones first. moved the crane up to minimize the distance. then back the crane up as needed.

we require contractors to have a lifting plan, and a detailed meeting. there are some amazing crane operators out there.

wilnj 11-05-2018 08:42 AM

I wouldn’t rule out mechanical failures. It happens even with the proper controls.

Modern cranes won’t lift something they’re not capable of but if something shifts once the laid is in the air, all bets are off.

In this case it looks like the panel started to go away from the crane and once that momentum headed in the wrong direction there was no bringing it back.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

vash 11-05-2018 08:47 AM

looks like he was booming down to get the panel further away from him to reach the landing spot. once that happens, the moment arm gets long fast. he can get the load out way past the load charts in a hurry.
it's an amazing video. so happy nobody got hurt.

brshap 11-05-2018 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wilnj (Post 10240204)
I wouldn’t rule out mechanical failures. It happens even with the proper controls.

Modern cranes won’t lift something they’re not capable of but if something shifts once the laid is in the air, all bets are off.

In this case it looks like the panel started to go away from the crane and once that momentum headed in the wrong direction there was no bringing it back.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They will if you turn the key. This looks like the crane was overloaded, pure and simple.

You see the rear come up when he's at the max radius before setting the panel down. Once he sets it down and the CG shifts just a bit further out he's already lost it. Cranes are designed to 85% overturning so he was already out of chart before he set the panel.

speeder 11-05-2018 08:56 AM

Wait, was that the wall w Mexico? :)

Mark Henry 11-05-2018 09:46 AM

I did tilt-wall construction for a couple years as a youngin, we had a large panel (26 ton IIRC) pop it's anchors (one goes the rest follow) and crash down. Sure makes you check your shorts.
Cost the boss lots, shut down till everything inspected/repaired/replaced and you're still paying by the hour.

sammyg2 11-05-2018 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wilnj (Post 10240204)
I wouldn’t rule out mechanical failures. It happens even with the proper controls.

Modern cranes won’t lift something they’re not capable of but if something shifts once the laid is in the air, all bets are off.

In this case it looks like the panel started to go away from the crane and once that momentum headed in the wrong direction there was no bringing it back.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


DISCLAIMER: I do not currently have an active crane license but was licensed in the past and operated cranes in the 80's while employed as a millwright.


There are two main parts of a load chart: structural and tipping.
There are also parts for "on outriggers" and "on rubber". There's over the front and over the side.
Lots of stuff to check before making a critical pick.

A trained operator knows the weight of the load and can calculate the radius and plot it on the chart whether it's over the front outriggers, over the side, on rubber, etc.
A crane like that is likely forbidden to ever pick on rubber, and rarely allowed to travel without breaking down the stick. Ground compaction etc. comes into play.

If a load is over 50% of capacity, a full lift plan should be developed and signed off by people who KNOW the weight and don't guess.
That prevents stuff like this from happening.

It's possible the operator had a load cell on the crane and was relying on that to tell him if he was over-loaded, but that would be wrong.
And an operator can over-ride anything he wants in the cab. it'll pick whatever he tells it to.

The operator in the video went past the tipping capacity of the crane. Pure and simple.
As he boomed down, the radius increased slightly and was enough to over-load the crane, causing it to tip. There was no load shifting or mechanical malfunction.

It's a Bragg crane, conventional stick, didn't see a jib. Bragg typically employs the best operators around but aren't cheap.
If it were a big hydro it's have all sorts of computers and alarms but it's a conventional.

He was on outriggers but picking over the side.
If I had to bet, I'd bet that was the problem.
From the video is appears that either he underestimated the weight, or used the load chart for over the front instead of over the side.

Scott Bragg is the prez and CEO of Bragg Companies, he was on the school board for St. Paul's Lutheran school many years ago when my kids went there.
We worked together on many occasions and are still members of the same church, next time I run into him I'll ask about it.

vash 11-05-2018 09:55 AM

nice name drop sammy!!

i am not a crane guy. but i thought with outrigger all out,the crane has the same capacity in a 360 degree circle? i didnt realize there were heavy sides.

sammyg2 11-05-2018 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vash (Post 10240330)
nice name drop sammy!!

i am not a crane guy. but i thought with outrigger all out,the crane has the same capacity in a 360 degree circle? i didnt realize there were heavy sides.

You like that?

I was thinking about digging up my training certificates and licenses, I got them around here somewhere but figured that would be over the top.


The load around the crane depends on the crane. An RT (rough terrain) crane would likely have the same capacity over the side on outriggers, but a truck-mount like that would prolly have more capacity over the front.
The ones I've operated did but that was decades ago.

widebody911 11-05-2018 10:05 AM

Do they always video crane ops, or was this just a lucky video capture?

Props to the cameraman for not screaming like a little girl, or pointing the camera at the ground for the money shot.

sammyg2 11-05-2018 10:28 AM

Here's a pick of a truck-mounted crane and an RT crane for comparison.

Note on the truck mounted crane, the long distance from the pivot to the front.
Even with the outriggers fully extended they would not extend out the side as far from the pivot as the front ones.

Apparently, it's all about the maths.


http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1541442439.jpg


http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1541442470.jpg

sammyg2 11-05-2018 10:47 AM

BTW, I watched a 50 ton RT crane similar to that last one get dropped once.

It was at san Onofre nuke plant, we were overhauling one of the turbines (million and a half HP).

We had a small crane like that one up on the deck to make small picks so the big crane wouldn't be tied up, IIRC it was rated for around 250 ton.

When the job was wrapping up one of the last jobs was to fly everything down off the deck, including that RT crane.
There was about 150 people employed for the overhaul but we were down to the last 8 of us after lay-offs and we were on the rigging crew that day.
The head rigger wore an orange vest and his work was final, no one argued with him or you got the axe. He was an ex-navy SEAL also.

He gave instructions to rig and fly down the RT crane, and i said: Don't you want us to fly down the stowed jib separate?

He said no, just extend the outriggers and choke them with these 50' long endless 2" slings.

I asked what kind of softeners he wanted us to use, he said just get some old cardboard boxes and use them.

This would be a good time to point out that outriggers have machined beams with fairly sharp corners.
RT cranes also have designed and engineered picking eyes to use when lifting, but the stowed jib was in the way. so it would naturally be flown down separately.
And cardboard was NOT as approved softener material.

That's when I told him I was having stomach cramps and needed to hit the bathroom right away and left the lift site.

i went down a couple hundred yards and watched from the smoke pen as they lifted the crane and got it about 5 or 10 feet up, before it went BANG a couple times and his the deck. it blew out the tires, bent the boom, and totaled the crane. It also tripped unit 2 off-line which was a bad thing.

The next day we were called into the office one by one and interviewed by OSHA and the NRG.

They asked me what happened, I said I dunno, I went to the bathroom!

The head rigger and superintendent got fired from bectel and banned from working at a nuke plant in the US for a number of years, not sure how many.

And there were lots and lots of procedures and paperwork developed because of that incident.

sammyg2 11-05-2018 10:52 AM

Ironically, that happened in August of 1995. I'm sure of that.


I just saw this web site that said they dropped a similar crane 40 feet at San Onofre in 2001.
Evidently they did NOT learn their lesson.



https://www.craneaccidents.com/2001/06/report/crane-accident-at-san-onofre-nuclear-power-plant/


http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1541443886.jpg

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1541443893.jpg

brshap 11-05-2018 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vash (Post 10240330)
nice name drop sammy!!

i am not a crane guy. but i thought with outrigger all out,the crane has the same capacity in a 360 degree circle? i didnt realize there were heavy sides.

Generally all terrain cranes have highest capacity over the rear. Depending on manufacturer, some will have charts for +/- 10 degrees over the rear with higher capacity than the 360 degree chart.

mdj930 11-05-2018 04:31 PM

Obviously I wasn't there but it looks like pure laziness. Move the damn rig it's level ( the surrounding area). I do know some truck cranes are to heavy to drive with all the counter weights on and if that's the case break it down and move it, that's better than flipping it.
I was part of a crew that erected a link belt 250 ton conventional crane with 250 foot of boom and drove it about a 1/4 mile to hoist some HVAC units at intel in Phoenix AZ. so it's not unheard of.
Btw I have never seen a license for a crane operator.
CCO ( certified crane operator) maby that's what's beings called a license.
and a truck crane always lifts the most weight off the ass end.
Mike

sammyg2 11-05-2018 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mdj930 (Post 10240850)
Obviously I wasn't there but it looks like pure laziness. Move the damn rig it's level ( the surrounding area). I do know some truck cranes are to heavy to drive with all the counter weights on and if that's the case break it down and move it, that's better than flipping it.
I was part of a crew that erected a link belt 250 ton conventional crane with 250 foot of boom and drove it about a 1/4 mile to hoist some HVAC units at intel in Phoenix AZ. so it's not unheard of.
Btw I have never seen a license for a crane operator.
CCO ( certified crane operator) maby that's what's beings called a license.
and a truck crane always lifts the most weight off the ass end.
Mike

You can call it a license, certificate, or whatever you'd like.

Quote:

Cal OSHA requirement:

§5006.1. Mobile Crane and Tower Crane-Operator Qualifications and Certification.

(a) Qualifications. The employer shall only permit operators who have a valid certificate of competency (certificate) issued in accordance with this section by an Accredited Certifying Entity for the type of crane to be used to operate a crane covered by this section. Certificates shall be issued to operators who:


(1) Pass a physical examination conducted by a physician which at a minimum shall include the examination criteria specified in the Ameri- can Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) B30.5-2000 standard, Chapter 5-3.1.2(a)(1-5, 7, 8) or the U.S. Department of Transportation (US DOT) physical examination requirements contained in 49 CFR Sections 391.41 through 391.49.


(2) Pass a substance abuse test. The level of testing shall be consistent with the standard practice for the industry where the crane is in use and this test shall be conducted by a recognized laboratory service;


(3) Pass a written examination developed, validated, and administered in accordance with the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (Copyright 1999) published jointly by the Joint Committee of the American Educational Research Association, the American Psychological Association, and the National Council in Measurement in Education. The exam shall test knowledge and skills identified as necessary for safe crane operations and shall, at a minimum, include the following:


(A) operational characteristics and controls, including characteristic and performance questions appropriate to the crane type for which qualification is sought;


(B) emergency control skills, such as a response to fire, power line contact, loss of stability, or control malfunction;


(C) a demonstration of basic arithmetic skills necessary for crane operation and the ability to read and comprehend the crane manufacturer's operation and maintenance instruction materials, including load capacity information (load charts) for the crane for which certification is sought;


(D) knowledge of chapters 5-0 through 5-3 of The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) B30.5-2000 and B30.5a-2002 Addenda to the standard for mobile and locomotive cranes or chapters 4-0 through 4-3 of the ASME B30.4-1996 standard for portal, tower, and pedestal cranes or Chapter 3-3 of the ASME B 30.3-1996 standard for Construction Tower Cranes, depending on the type of crane(s) the operator intends to operate.


(4) Pass a "hands-on" examination to demonstrate proficiency in operating the specific type of crane, which at a minimum shall include pre-start and post-start inspection, maneuvering skills, shutdown, and securing procedures.

(b) Certification. Certificates shall be valid for a maximum of five (5) years. An Accredited Certifying Entity shall issue the certificate of competency to operators who successfully demonstrate the qualifications set forth in (a)(1)- (4) of this section.

(c) Accredited Certifying Entity. A certifying entity is any organization whose certification program is accredited by either the National Commission for Certifying Agencies (NCCA), or the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). ANSI accreditation shall be in accordance with the requirements of the ANSI, International Organization for Standardization (ISO), International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 17024:2003(E), Conformity Assessment-General Requirements for Bodies Operating Certification of Persons, which is hereby incorporated by reference.

(d) Re-certification. Crane operators shall re-certify every five (5) years and shall be required to meet all of the qualifications set forth in subsection (a). Operators with at least one-thousand (1,000) hours of documented experience operating the specific type of crane for which re-certification is sought as covered by this section during the immediately preceding certification period and who meet the physical examination, substance abuse, and written examination requirements set forth in subsections (a)(1), (a)(2) and (a)(3) of this section shall not be required to take the "hands-on" examination specified in subsection (a)(4) to re-certify.

(e) Trainees may be authorized to operate mobile or tower cranes provided they are under the direct supervision of an operator possessing a valid certificate of competency for the type of crane operated by the trainee.

The term direct supervision means the supervising operator is in the immediate area of the trainee and within visual sighting distance and able to effectively communicate with the trainee. When performing direct supervision, the supervising operator shall have no other duties other than to observe the operation of the crane by the trainee.

(f) Effective Date. The requirements of Section 5006.1 shall become effective on June 1, 2005.

EXCEPTIONS TO SECTION 5006.1:


(1) Mobile cranes having a boom length of less than 25 feet or a maximum rated load capacity of less than 15,000 pounds.


(2) Operators of electric line trucks (digger derrick trucks) as defined in Section 2700 of the Electrical Safety Orders, and regulated by Section 2940.7 of the High Voltage Electrical Safety Orders. This exception does not include mobile truck cranes designed and built in accordance with the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) B30.5 standards.


(3) Marine terminal operations regulated by Article 14 of these Orders.

sammyg2 11-05-2018 05:01 PM

BTW, moving a large conventional rig with that much stick can be a really bad idea.

About a year before I went to work there, a local refinery had an incident when they were moving a large Lampson crane and did not do a ground compaction survey, and it gave out.
The crane went over and was cut up into scrap metal.
The stick barely missed an office trainer owned by union pacific resources and the guy sitting in the office, and fell across the Anaheim street bridge in Wilmington.

the crane was a sister to the one pictured below:

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1541466000.jpg

pete3799 11-05-2018 05:48 PM

I had a crane tip over while trying to unload a 32 ton piece of machinery off my trailer at a Texas state corrections facility near Houston.
Inmates were operating it at the time. They got it up off my trailer and the plan was i drive out from under it.....almost made it. The back of the crane came off the ground and the machine hit the dirt and tipped back against my trailer. They ended up chaining the blade of a D9 cat crawler to the back of the crane and lowered the blade. Surprisingly no damage to my trailer.

I used to haul cranes (crane parts) to a lot of windmill sites.
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1541468580.JPG
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1541468580.JPG
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1541468580.JPG

URY914 11-05-2018 06:23 PM

Here's a tilt-up project I was the project manager back in '09. Big crane...

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1541470668.jpg

URY914 11-05-2018 06:25 PM

Hard to believe how big this thing is until you're next to it.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1541471043.jpg

sc_rufctr 11-24-2018 08:02 PM

I wasn't sure were to put this...

Take my word for it. It's worth watching!

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/hy7rHJ2dYR0" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

unclebilly 11-24-2018 08:17 PM

These are really cool. I have worked with these on multi well pad sites. Wherever they stop, they are setup. No out riggers, you can move with a load. Absolutely awesome.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1543119364.jpg

Liebherr makes them too.

Jeff Higgins 11-24-2018 09:49 PM

Thank God for hard hats.

svandamme 11-25-2018 06:35 AM

check out this one

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/k2Da6FoWh3k" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

URY914 11-25-2018 07:00 AM

Pre-OSHA

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1543157997.jpg

sc_rufctr 11-25-2018 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by svandamme (Post 10262436)
check out this one

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/k2Da6FoWh3k" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Holy cow! That's one of the worst I've seen. The flute music in the background was surreal... lol

svandamme 11-25-2018 08:52 AM

The governement safety post mortem came to the conclusion that

High cranes were not stable enough on pontoons (No sjit sherlock)


And it all got screwed up because the City had not mandated a safety plan to the builder because they didn't think they were responsible for the safety.

The Builder didn't think it was the responsible party for the safety because they had subcontracted it to the crane company, and figured they would do the necessary.

the crane company had subcontracted the pontoons and figured those were stable enough and had pretty much calculated everything without any margins or consideration for basic things like wind and extra gear put on the deck of the pontoons.


If you ask me they are a bunch of morons because even a single crane on such a pontoon would be screwed for any kind of lateral movement and these morons did a double crane lift..

I'm not engineer but even I could have told em up front that **** would not work.

120 foot cranes on a floating 40 foot wide pontoon and they had not even told neigbours to clear the area?? They got very lucky nobody got injured or killed.

pavulon 11-25-2018 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by svandamme (Post 10262539)
I'm not engineer but even I could have told em up front that **** would not work.

It works for new crane sales!

Seahawk 11-25-2018 09:22 AM

I have a confession. I would have loved to have been a crane operator/heavy equipment operator.

One of my neighbors owns a construction company that does a wide range of projects, including rock sea walls.

I hired him to stabilize a portion of my sea wall, add rock to help buttress the pressure treated wood. The rocks are in the 50 to 200 pound range and are stacked against the existing sea wall.

He has a really nice excavator to move the rocks. No grabber. I went out to check on his progress and he gives me the, "you want to give it a try" challenge.

Duh.

He then bets me $20 that I won't be able to pick up the rock with the bucket alone.

Easiest $20 bucks I have ever made. It was great!

What is interesting to me concerning all the videos is that the machines have a death rattle.

Captain Ahab Jr 11-25-2018 09:35 AM

Got a crane coming this week to lift my man cave roof steel beams into place and watching :eek: those video's are not doing my nerves any good :D

wdfifteen 11-25-2018 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seahawk (Post 10262555)
I have a confession. I would have loved to have been a crane operator/heavy equipment operator.

You are not alone.
Over drinks one night a friend and I put together plan to build a rent-by-the hour gravel pit. It would basically be a fantasy camp for wannabe heavy equipment operators. Get some of those big-ass dump trucks, some cranes, lots of bulldozers, backhoes, pan scrapers, etc, and charge per hour per machine to let people come in and play with them. It would have involved a lot of up front investment - more than we had - but I still think it would have worked.

dlockhart 11-25-2018 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wdfifteen (Post 10262672)
You are not alone.
Over drinks one night a friend and I put together plan to build a rent-by-the hour gravel pit. It would basically be a fantasy camp for wannabe heavy equipment operators.

https://digthisvegas.com/

,

crustychief 11-25-2018 01:13 PM

https://youtu.be/8vWbBv47PxA



A continuation of the retaining wall video.

Rtrorkt 11-25-2018 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crustychief (Post 10262733)
https://youtu.be/8vWbBv47PxA



A continuation of the retaining wall video.

Thought that would happen. Bunch of po'ed folks who lived there I expect. Just bad structural engineering. Who in their right mind would leave the bottom of the retaining wall above the grade?

Alan A 11-25-2018 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wdfifteen (Post 10262672)
You are not alone.
Over drinks one night a friend and I put together plan to build a rent-by-the hour gravel pit. It would basically be a fantasy camp for wannabe heavy equipment operators. Get some of those big-ass dump trucks, some cranes, lots of bulldozers, backhoes, pan scrapers, etc, and charge per hour per machine to let people come in and play with them. It would have involved a lot of up front investment - more than we had - but I still think it would have worked.

Rented a smaller dozer/backhoe combo one weekend to level a chunk of the back yard so I had a flat pad for the kids jungle gym. #1 was 6 at the time and I let him sit with me and operate it. I live on a hill - yard slopes off in 2 directions and there was no way to install it without levelling.

He had more fun playing with that thing than he ever did on the playground after it was installed. I should have bought one of those instead...


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.