![]() |
crane tips over!!
wow!!
<iframe width="853" height="485" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/hGX-5eWfGVA" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
That was inexcusable. Someone looses their license.
|
Quote:
|
This is why crane operators make the big bucks. It looks so easy when everything goes right.
|
In the YouTube video comments, someone said they all got out fine.
I am not too familiar with cranes, but as an armchair commenter, don't the crane legs spread out more? Looks like they are fairly close in. |
i work around cranes all the time. they still scare the crap out of me.
in all my life, i have never seen a crane sit on such a nice surface as the one in the video. looks like his outriggers were out..they couldnt get closer because of the bracing on the wall already up. that in my opinion is where they effed up. they should have done the furthest ones first. moved the crane up to minimize the distance. then back the crane up as needed. we require contractors to have a lifting plan, and a detailed meeting. there are some amazing crane operators out there. |
I wouldn’t rule out mechanical failures. It happens even with the proper controls.
Modern cranes won’t lift something they’re not capable of but if something shifts once the laid is in the air, all bets are off. In this case it looks like the panel started to go away from the crane and once that momentum headed in the wrong direction there was no bringing it back. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
looks like he was booming down to get the panel further away from him to reach the landing spot. once that happens, the moment arm gets long fast. he can get the load out way past the load charts in a hurry.
it's an amazing video. so happy nobody got hurt. |
Quote:
You see the rear come up when he's at the max radius before setting the panel down. Once he sets it down and the CG shifts just a bit further out he's already lost it. Cranes are designed to 85% overturning so he was already out of chart before he set the panel. |
Wait, was that the wall w Mexico? :)
|
I did tilt-wall construction for a couple years as a youngin, we had a large panel (26 ton IIRC) pop it's anchors (one goes the rest follow) and crash down. Sure makes you check your shorts.
Cost the boss lots, shut down till everything inspected/repaired/replaced and you're still paying by the hour. |
Quote:
DISCLAIMER: I do not currently have an active crane license but was licensed in the past and operated cranes in the 80's while employed as a millwright. There are two main parts of a load chart: structural and tipping. There are also parts for "on outriggers" and "on rubber". There's over the front and over the side. Lots of stuff to check before making a critical pick. A trained operator knows the weight of the load and can calculate the radius and plot it on the chart whether it's over the front outriggers, over the side, on rubber, etc. A crane like that is likely forbidden to ever pick on rubber, and rarely allowed to travel without breaking down the stick. Ground compaction etc. comes into play. If a load is over 50% of capacity, a full lift plan should be developed and signed off by people who KNOW the weight and don't guess. That prevents stuff like this from happening. It's possible the operator had a load cell on the crane and was relying on that to tell him if he was over-loaded, but that would be wrong. And an operator can over-ride anything he wants in the cab. it'll pick whatever he tells it to. The operator in the video went past the tipping capacity of the crane. Pure and simple. As he boomed down, the radius increased slightly and was enough to over-load the crane, causing it to tip. There was no load shifting or mechanical malfunction. It's a Bragg crane, conventional stick, didn't see a jib. Bragg typically employs the best operators around but aren't cheap. If it were a big hydro it's have all sorts of computers and alarms but it's a conventional. He was on outriggers but picking over the side. If I had to bet, I'd bet that was the problem. From the video is appears that either he underestimated the weight, or used the load chart for over the front instead of over the side. Scott Bragg is the prez and CEO of Bragg Companies, he was on the school board for St. Paul's Lutheran school many years ago when my kids went there. We worked together on many occasions and are still members of the same church, next time I run into him I'll ask about it. |
nice name drop sammy!!
i am not a crane guy. but i thought with outrigger all out,the crane has the same capacity in a 360 degree circle? i didnt realize there were heavy sides. |
Quote:
I was thinking about digging up my training certificates and licenses, I got them around here somewhere but figured that would be over the top. The load around the crane depends on the crane. An RT (rough terrain) crane would likely have the same capacity over the side on outriggers, but a truck-mount like that would prolly have more capacity over the front. The ones I've operated did but that was decades ago. |
Do they always video crane ops, or was this just a lucky video capture?
Props to the cameraman for not screaming like a little girl, or pointing the camera at the ground for the money shot. |
Here's a pick of a truck-mounted crane and an RT crane for comparison.
Note on the truck mounted crane, the long distance from the pivot to the front. Even with the outriggers fully extended they would not extend out the side as far from the pivot as the front ones. Apparently, it's all about the maths. http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1541442439.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1541442470.jpg |
BTW, I watched a 50 ton RT crane similar to that last one get dropped once.
It was at san Onofre nuke plant, we were overhauling one of the turbines (million and a half HP). We had a small crane like that one up on the deck to make small picks so the big crane wouldn't be tied up, IIRC it was rated for around 250 ton. When the job was wrapping up one of the last jobs was to fly everything down off the deck, including that RT crane. There was about 150 people employed for the overhaul but we were down to the last 8 of us after lay-offs and we were on the rigging crew that day. The head rigger wore an orange vest and his work was final, no one argued with him or you got the axe. He was an ex-navy SEAL also. He gave instructions to rig and fly down the RT crane, and i said: Don't you want us to fly down the stowed jib separate? He said no, just extend the outriggers and choke them with these 50' long endless 2" slings. I asked what kind of softeners he wanted us to use, he said just get some old cardboard boxes and use them. This would be a good time to point out that outriggers have machined beams with fairly sharp corners. RT cranes also have designed and engineered picking eyes to use when lifting, but the stowed jib was in the way. so it would naturally be flown down separately. And cardboard was NOT as approved softener material. That's when I told him I was having stomach cramps and needed to hit the bathroom right away and left the lift site. i went down a couple hundred yards and watched from the smoke pen as they lifted the crane and got it about 5 or 10 feet up, before it went BANG a couple times and his the deck. it blew out the tires, bent the boom, and totaled the crane. It also tripped unit 2 off-line which was a bad thing. The next day we were called into the office one by one and interviewed by OSHA and the NRG. They asked me what happened, I said I dunno, I went to the bathroom! The head rigger and superintendent got fired from bectel and banned from working at a nuke plant in the US for a number of years, not sure how many. And there were lots and lots of procedures and paperwork developed because of that incident. |
Ironically, that happened in August of 1995. I'm sure of that.
I just saw this web site that said they dropped a similar crane 40 feet at San Onofre in 2001. Evidently they did NOT learn their lesson. https://www.craneaccidents.com/2001/06/report/crane-accident-at-san-onofre-nuclear-power-plant/ http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1541443886.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1541443893.jpg |
Quote:
|
Obviously I wasn't there but it looks like pure laziness. Move the damn rig it's level ( the surrounding area). I do know some truck cranes are to heavy to drive with all the counter weights on and if that's the case break it down and move it, that's better than flipping it.
I was part of a crew that erected a link belt 250 ton conventional crane with 250 foot of boom and drove it about a 1/4 mile to hoist some HVAC units at intel in Phoenix AZ. so it's not unheard of. Btw I have never seen a license for a crane operator. CCO ( certified crane operator) maby that's what's beings called a license. and a truck crane always lifts the most weight off the ass end. Mike |
Quote:
Quote:
|
BTW, moving a large conventional rig with that much stick can be a really bad idea.
About a year before I went to work there, a local refinery had an incident when they were moving a large Lampson crane and did not do a ground compaction survey, and it gave out. The crane went over and was cut up into scrap metal. The stick barely missed an office trainer owned by union pacific resources and the guy sitting in the office, and fell across the Anaheim street bridge in Wilmington. the crane was a sister to the one pictured below: http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1541466000.jpg |
I had a crane tip over while trying to unload a 32 ton piece of machinery off my trailer at a Texas state corrections facility near Houston.
Inmates were operating it at the time. They got it up off my trailer and the plan was i drive out from under it.....almost made it. The back of the crane came off the ground and the machine hit the dirt and tipped back against my trailer. They ended up chaining the blade of a D9 cat crawler to the back of the crane and lowered the blade. Surprisingly no damage to my trailer. I used to haul cranes (crane parts) to a lot of windmill sites. http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1541468580.JPG http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1541468580.JPG http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1541468580.JPG |
Here's a tilt-up project I was the project manager back in '09. Big crane...
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1541470668.jpg |
Hard to believe how big this thing is until you're next to it.
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1541471043.jpg |
I wasn't sure were to put this...
Take my word for it. It's worth watching! <iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/hy7rHJ2dYR0" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
These are really cool. I have worked with these on multi well pad sites. Wherever they stop, they are setup. No out riggers, you can move with a load. Absolutely awesome.
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1543119364.jpg Liebherr makes them too. |
Thank God for hard hats.
|
check out this one
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/k2Da6FoWh3k" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
|
Quote:
|
The governement safety post mortem came to the conclusion that
High cranes were not stable enough on pontoons (No sjit sherlock) And it all got screwed up because the City had not mandated a safety plan to the builder because they didn't think they were responsible for the safety. The Builder didn't think it was the responsible party for the safety because they had subcontracted it to the crane company, and figured they would do the necessary. the crane company had subcontracted the pontoons and figured those were stable enough and had pretty much calculated everything without any margins or consideration for basic things like wind and extra gear put on the deck of the pontoons. If you ask me they are a bunch of morons because even a single crane on such a pontoon would be screwed for any kind of lateral movement and these morons did a double crane lift.. I'm not engineer but even I could have told em up front that **** would not work. 120 foot cranes on a floating 40 foot wide pontoon and they had not even told neigbours to clear the area?? They got very lucky nobody got injured or killed. |
Quote:
|
I have a confession. I would have loved to have been a crane operator/heavy equipment operator.
One of my neighbors owns a construction company that does a wide range of projects, including rock sea walls. I hired him to stabilize a portion of my sea wall, add rock to help buttress the pressure treated wood. The rocks are in the 50 to 200 pound range and are stacked against the existing sea wall. He has a really nice excavator to move the rocks. No grabber. I went out to check on his progress and he gives me the, "you want to give it a try" challenge. Duh. He then bets me $20 that I won't be able to pick up the rock with the bucket alone. Easiest $20 bucks I have ever made. It was great! What is interesting to me concerning all the videos is that the machines have a death rattle. |
Got a crane coming this week to lift my man cave roof steel beams into place and watching :eek: those video's are not doing my nerves any good :D
|
Quote:
Over drinks one night a friend and I put together plan to build a rent-by-the hour gravel pit. It would basically be a fantasy camp for wannabe heavy equipment operators. Get some of those big-ass dump trucks, some cranes, lots of bulldozers, backhoes, pan scrapers, etc, and charge per hour per machine to let people come in and play with them. It would have involved a lot of up front investment - more than we had - but I still think it would have worked. |
Quote:
, |
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
He had more fun playing with that thing than he ever did on the playground after it was installed. I should have bought one of those instead... |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:26 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website