![]() |
I will never get it.
There is a 89 911 Speedster on BAT right now that is at 106k. It's not a super fast car, it not a particularly beautiful car. Looks like a regular mid year cab. Yeah they made less speedsters but the car is just not different enough that most would even know it was different than a regular cab. If I am paying that kind of money, I would want it to be a standout car.
I get it is whatever the market will pay, I just don't get why. I might pay $30-35k, other than that, I would look for another Porsche. Is it just being able to snub your nose as the regular cab guys/gals? |
ok then, go buy a regular 89 cab for your 30-35 and tell us how that goes.
|
I'd entertain the idea of 40K not sayin I'd sell... but I'd think about it.
|
This will probably go way over $30K but RE: a recent thread where a pelican was looking at +$100K Ferrari's if I had that kind of money this is what I would be looking at:
https://bringatrailer.com/porsche/930-turbo/ |
Quote:
|
Quote:
....first come.... 60k might do it ;) |
it has the cut down windscreen - which last I heard was $12,000 to replace - so it's got that going for it
|
plus limited production numbers.. (had to use up those unsellable turbo cab bodies somehow).. and the name "speedster".
|
Quote:
I don't get it either. Limited numbers or not, I'd rather have the lighter 911 cab, or the more powerful 930 cab. The Speedster's the last of the cab variants in which I'd be interested. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It sold for $125k plus $5k buyer’s fee= $130k. They have sold for quite a bit more at times, not sure if the market is up or down right now. I don’t follow them.
They’ve always been somewhat collectible since they came out. The problem is that cars like that, “planned classics”, is that all of them were bought to look at rather than drive and most have extremely low miles and just go from auction to auction. No one has ever gotten much pleasure from owning one, you can’t really drive it like a regular car and they haven’t appreciated much. The aforementioned $12k windshield can sort of ruin a blast up the coast, stone chips are a part of life. |
Quote:
https://www.barrett-jackson.com/Events/Event/Details/1989-PORSCHE-911-CARRERA-SPEEDSTER-NICHOLAS-CAGES-65790 |
I have always really loved those cars. Sorry. I think they are cool.
|
I have ridden in this car, it is damn fast.
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1548811620.JPG http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1548811620.JPG |
Subjective I know but I think these Speedsters are the best looking of all the impact bumper car variants. The windshield and flares with no tail is magic. Have gone tailless on the on the M491 for a while now, love the look.
|
Quote:
Meaningless trivia: I was in acting class w Nick 100 years ago when he was still Nicholas Coppola. Did lots of scenes w him, super nice guy. |
Denis’ comment about planned classics is an interesting one. The original Speedster became a classic due to its popularity as a race car, it’s basic and lightweight design, and a connection to James Dean. Porsche didn’t make it with the intention of becoming a classic, it just happens to be appreciated as one. The Carrera based Speedster is basically a styling exercise that is nothing special underneath, and it’s really only unique as a showpiece. Sadly that’s the case with many modern “classics”, just another car to impress your fellow collectors and polish in the garage. It all seems rather contrived.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website