Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   Mustangs gonna stang (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/1022653-mustangs-gonna-stang.html)

svandamme 03-05-2019 11:23 PM

then why are they called Shelby again??

pwd72s 03-05-2019 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by svandamme (Post 10379194)
then why are they called Shelby again??

Ford bought the rights...

pavulon 03-06-2019 01:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pwd72s (Post 10379197)
Ford bought the rights...

And CS would put his name on anything for money.

ckelly78z 03-06-2019 01:54 AM

Wow, alot of Mustang hate here on a car forum. To me, they look better, sound better, handle better, and cost less.

Tervuren 03-06-2019 02:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HardDrive (Post 10377662)
I enjoy my 2003 Mach 1. The engine is a lot of fun. 305hp, 320 torque, 5 speed.

But the suspension...yeah, it will keep you on your toes. Its frankly a bit scary.

The 2015+ cars with IRS are different animal entirely. And the modern GT350 is a track monster.

My problem is in spectator drags there are a lot of factors that could come into play beyond the car itself. I'm still trying to figure it out.

For example, tires are important, are the Mustang drivers in spectator drags cheap on tires?

Then there is the driver element.

I've had one incident with a 2015+ Mustang GT where two lanes went down to one lane on the entrance ramp of a left turn from a stop light. Despite my Jaguar being at a power/weight disadvantage, and I also was on the outside lane, I had the guy enough to pull in front before my lane ended.

I did hear his tires squeal perhaps a bit too much on launch, maybe he over did it. Maybe I'm a better driver, maybe I had better tires. I was surprised by the result.

Spectator drags seem to routinely see such upsets as my own experience. There are just some significant unknown factors that do not make it an even comparison of the cars themselves.

onewhippedpuppy 03-06-2019 03:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chapo (Post 10379149)
The 911S cost about 30k more than the GT350. different cars for different buyers. Doesn't matter, most won't see the track.

Worth noting that’s $60k vs $90k, which means you can buy 1.5 GT350s for the price of a single 911. Also good luck finding a 911 without any options, that’s a unicorn. I bet there’s not a single 911 on a dealer lot for under $100k.

I’ll seriously consider a GT350 on the used market once they get a little cheaper, they are incredible cars that sound amazing.

legion 03-06-2019 05:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ckelly78z (Post 10379219)
Wow, alot of Mustang hate here on a car forum. To me, they look better, sound better, handle better, and cost less.

I bought a 2016 Mustang because it was the best bang for the buck. And with the independent rear suspension, it handles very well. I think a lot of the drivers who get into to trouble with them simply don't understand car handling and/or power application. They are in the same price range as front wheel drive cars that simply understeer when in trouble. They are in the same price range as Miatas and BRZs/86s that don't have the horsepower to induce massive oversteer. They are probably the first and only car most drivers encounter where you can steer with the throttle or break the drive wheels loose at highway speeds. I personally am VERY sensitive to wheel spin and try to avoid it at all costs.

herr_oberst 03-06-2019 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ckelly78z (Post 10379219)
To me, they look better, sound better, handle better, and cost less.

Than what?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.