Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   One year into retirement! (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/1043351-one-year-into-retirement.html)

CurtEgerer 10-24-2019 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3rd_gear_Ted (Post 10634735)
Everyday is a Saturday

I often have to check a calendar to figure out what day or week of the month it is. And I rarely do that because, well, I don't really care anyway :D

Successful retirement isn't really about money, it's about contentment. Some people need to work to be content. Some people need to maintain their big house/expensive cars lifestyle to be content. Some people need simplicity and almost nothing (in a material sense) to be content. What makes you content will define how much (or how little) money you will need. Most people's idea of contentment changes as they age. If you're lucky enough to already be in the 'need simplicity and almost nothing' category, it can be done well on a shockingly small amount of money. :cool:

GH85Carrera 10-24-2019 01:14 PM

My former boss, in his words took "early retirement" at age 92. He sold the company and was done. He had retired form the FAA (it was the CAA when he started) long ago. He did not owe any money, and he sold his airplane after thanking his last flight as pilot in command on his 92nd birthday.

He did not see it is as coming to work, it was just for fun, and a way to help people.

I am still in business, but I work from home most of the time.

My wife is retired. We go do errands at the time of day others are off to work and avoid crowds. As long as my job is very low stress, and profitable, I have no intention of selling out.

The only debt we have is the airplane. It was a necessary and logical thing to buy and if we get a few more of the big projects we just delivered we might pay off the airplane in a few years.

rcooled 10-24-2019 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeke (Post 10634699)
Fun stuff doesn't last...makes for great stories no one wants to hear. Leave some of that responsibly if possible. Have some for a rainy day. If running hot and hard and checking out early is your mantra, make sure you don't change your mind.

Good advice there, Zeke...well said.

stealthn 10-24-2019 01:29 PM

This is a good thread, but sure wants to make me retire ASAP so I can still do fun things.

I guess if I run out of money the wallmart greeter job is always there ;)

tdw28210 10-24-2019 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seahawk (Post 10634612)
A few observations, Tabs-like:

- Depending on SS income as part of your retirement financial planning is risky at best. There will be means testing in the future as Progressives get elected and have promises to keep. Your ROI on SS will be reduced. There will not enough folks rowing the boat to drag your old a$$e$ to the promised land.

- State, federal and private pension plans are all built on sand...especially military and Civil Servant retirements when the great unwashed figure out just how much those retirements are worth. They will be reduced or eliminated. I have not spent a dime of my O-6 retirement since I retired in 2009. If I lived in California and planned on keeping my State retirement, I'd be worried. Private pension plans are a complete house of cards. ENRON for a thousand, Alex.

- Federal, state and other health plans: They have been exempt to date (I have Tricare but use my wife's government health insurance, which is amazing) but will come under scrutiny and means testing when the real numbers are crunched by the ungrateful without your Cadillac-ack-ack-ack of insurance plans: You ought to know by now. Lose weight, get healthy and get ready to execute a no extraordinary measures health care posture.

- Federal or State bank insurance on your investments? Please.

There is a bunch of good news, but it all resides in proper prior planning and has been listed here: No debt, layered protection of assets, including real property, investment in tangible assets with proven worth in financial down-turns, etc.

I hate to be a downer, but government guarantees are worth nothing, ask the Tribes. Do not depend on a government revenue stream or protection in the long term. Save that money in layered plans.

I need a drink.

Not to be disagreeable, but total comp in the public sector has outpaced the private sector for sometime now. From a 2012 Princeton study:

...the Griswold Center for Economic Policy Studies at Princeton University published a working paper on the same topic. It was formally published a year later in the journal Public Administration Research. This study found that “taking differences in employee characteristics into account,” federal workers earn 34.2 percent more than private-sector workers.

And those government pensions aren't going anywhere. Politicians will take taxes to the max before even suggesting any kind of benefit reduction. Look at City of Chicago. They have a $50 billion unfunded pension liability and all they can come up with is raising taxes and putting the screws to the gullible country folk downstate. As for the tribes, that's a false comparison. They weren't government employees - they were effectively wards of the state (until gambling revenue came along for some of them).

Those government pensions ain't built on sand, they're covered in gold courtesy of the taxpayer. Don't believe me? Then go suggest to all the participants they should be forced to convert their pensions into 401k's. Just take the bus that day or risk having car keyed into a pile of dust. ;)

fintstone 10-24-2019 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tdw28210 (Post 10634910)
Not to be disagreeable, but total comp in the public sector has outpaced the private sector for sometime now. From a 2012 Princeton study:

...the Griswold Center for Economic Policy Studies at Princeton University published a working paper on the same topic. It was formally published a year later in the journal Public Administration Research. This study found that “taking differences in employee characteristics into account,” federal workers earn 34.2 percent more than private-sector workers. ...

Although Federal benefits are very good, studies like this one from 2012 are not accurate because the authors did not understand Federal benefits and compute them incorrectly. This one did not consider employee contributions and attributed the benefits paid to existing retirees as compensation to current workers. Something they do not do for private sector employees. You cannot claim that a current employee is receiving benefits that are paid to someone that retired 30 years earlier. Worse yet, the Fed system was "reformed" in 1996...so there are almost none left under the old, much more lucrative system. Also, there were several years of pay freezes and increases to contributions since 2012. If you )or anyone wants to be a Fed, you should sign up now as they are desperate to find qualified employees. The same is true with the military...with a much, much more lucrative retirement program. The Marines could use a few good men...today. So could the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard.

sammyg2 10-24-2019 03:15 PM

'Good" men? How good?

Never mind, prolly not interested in ole farts with bad knees.

fintstone 10-24-2019 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sammyg2 (Post 10634981)
'Good" men? How good?

Never mind, prolly not interested in ole farts with bad knees.

Feds would be. But not the military.

wdfifteen 10-24-2019 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeke (Post 10634699)
Fun stuff doesn't last. I've done more 'fun' stuff than I ever planned for or needed to do. Makes for great stories no one wants to hear.

That's great. I'm happy for you, but I'm sorry it you think it was so boring no one wants to hear about it or could be inspired by it. It lasts if you share it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeke (Post 10634699)
If life's goal is to enrich one's self the whole concept is subjective. Great travels, reading, wine, track days?

I'm sure stories of great travels, reading, wine, and track days would be more interesting and more inspiring than stories of surgeries, pains, and excuses for not participating in life because of them. I wish I had done more when I could and had more stories to pass on to and hopefully inspire my grandchildren. My philosophy is that ideas and inspiration are more valuable to my grandkids than money. It seems to have worked with my son, anyway.

Caution - off topic ramble here:

OTOH, in my early life I thought my father never did anything remarkable. He never got his name in the paper. He went to work every day, came home every night, didn't drink, he did smoke a pipe however. He kept all of us us clothed and fed and kept the house warm. As I look back I think that made him a pretty damn remarkable father. He told us kids, "You are going to go to college. I don't know how you are going to pay for it, but you are going to go."
Of the four of us there are 2 PhDs, an MBA, and me - the dummy with an BS in ME, and we all did it ourselves.

fintstone 10-24-2019 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tdw28210 (Post 10634910)
...Then go suggest to all the participants they should be forced to convert their pensions into 401k's. Just take the bus that day or risk having car keyed into a pile of dust. ;)

Interestingly, at the rate of return that the current Fed/mil S&P-tracking 401K returns, employees would be much better off putting the 4.4% they contribute to FERS each month into that. Assuming one worked 30 years at $100K salary and put the 4.4% into the 401K, and retired at age 60, they could get a draw more than 4 times as much as the Fed pension per year from age 60 to age 90 than what they would get from their pension (if you exclude the modest cola)...and still have over $500K left over. Even worse, if they die the day after they retire, the Government keeps their retirement and doesn't pay at all. If in a 401K, their heirs get almost $1.5M.

A 401K is much better if you actually put money in it and take some risk (market-based fund). The problem is, people that don't have a pension (and get the extra compensation) simply spend it.

tdw28210 10-24-2019 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fintstone (Post 10634973)
Although Federal benefits are very good, studies like this one from 2012 are not accurate because the authors did not understand Federal benefits and compute them incorrectly. This one did not consider employee contributions and attributed the benefits paid to existing retirees as compensation to current workers. Something they do not do for private sector employees. You cannot claim that a current employee is receiving benefits that are paid to someone that retired 30 years earlier. Worse yet, the Fed system was "reformed" in 1996...so there are almost none left under the old, much more lucrative system. Also, there were several years of pay freezes and increases to contributions since 2012. If you )or anyone wants to be a Fed, you should sign up now as they are desperate to find qualified employees. The same is true with the military...with a much, much more lucrative retirement program. The Marines could use a few good men...today. So could the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard.

Wait..what? You saying the guys at Princeton don't do math correctly? OK....
Perhaps you prefer this study then? from the CBO: https://www.cbo.gov/publication/52637
The first page pretty clearly shows than unless you have a PhD, you're better off being a government employee.

Bill Douglas 10-24-2019 05:32 PM

I made investments at an early age, and worked pretty hard. I'd a daytime job, and evening job, and another job I worked at some weekends. Plus I'd been working most school holidays since I was 11, so when I got thrown out of my job at 45 I found my investment returns were more than I was getting paid as a low level computer tech, so I called it retirement.

fintstone 10-24-2019 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tdw28210 (Post 10635065)
Wait..what? You saying the guys at Princeton don't do math correctly? OK....
Perhaps you prefer this study then? from the CBO: https://www.cbo.gov/publication/52637
The first page pretty clearly shows than unless you have a PhD, you're better off being a government employee.

The math was good, but they used the wrong numbers. Someone should have done a little research before using the wrong numbers.

Yes, that study is a bit better...but you read it wrong. Federal workers with a masters degree or a professional degree or doctorate earned less, on average, than their private-sector counterparts. That is a large portion of the workforce...so the difference is mostly where you compare low-level feds with fast food/service employees that don't need a clearance or background check.

That is 29 percent of the Federal workforce vice 11% of the private sector workforce. 60% feds have a Bachelors or higher while only 35% of the private workforce does. The feds also cannot have financial problems, used drugs (even where legal), a criminal record, etc...and generally need a clearance which are higher requirements than most private sector jobs. Additionally, Feds work in urban areas where the cost of living is higher (16% of Feds work in high cost DC while only 2% of private sector do). Try moving to DC and see if the cost of living is the same as BF NC. 63% of feds are in professional or management jobs while only 39% are in the private sector.

I constantly hear abut the fabulous benefits in the military and with Fed jobs...yet none of the folks that seem to think that are applying for either. Why is that? Like the military, if things were so much better, folks would be lined up all the way to the VA and MD borders for a job in DC and the huge problem hiring Feds would not exist.

TSA will start you at $15.89 hr...Census $12.57 hr

latunabernie 10-24-2019 06:46 PM

We sold our house in L,A,
Oct. 22 marked our first anniversary living in Mariposa.
Today we went to Yosemite Had lunch at the Ahwannee Inn.
Porsche is running great.
Going to take the Tioga Pass & Sonora Pass before the roads close.
I love being retired.

tdw28210 10-24-2019 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fintstone (Post 10635136)
The math was good, but they used the wrong numbers. Someone should have done a little research before using the wrong numbers.

Yes, that study is a bit better...but you read it wrong. Federal workers with a masters degree or a professional degree or doctorate earned less, on average, than their private-sector counterparts. That is a large portion of the workforce...so the difference is mostly where you compare low-level feds with fast food/service employees that don't need a clearance or background check.

That is 29 percent of the Federal workforce vice 11% of the private sector workforce. 60% feds have a Bachelors or higher while only 35% of the private workforce does. The feds also cannot have financial problems, used drugs (even where legal), a criminal record, etc...and generally need a clearance which are higher requirements than most private sector jobs. Additionally, Feds work in urban areas where the cost of living is higher (16% of Feds work in high cost DC while only 2% of private sector do). 63% of feds are in professional or management jobs while only 39% are in the private sector.

Sorry, you're reading it wrong. We're talking total comp here, not just salaries. And I am pretty comfortable saying 1000's of government workers (including federal workers) have some sort of criminal record. Drug use too.

VincentVega 10-24-2019 07:17 PM

This sure took a turn.

Its pretty refreshing to hear about you old guys :) that have figured out how to make it work. I have a ways to go but hopefully not that long. I guess I could pack up, move to the midwest and call it. I sure hope there is more to it than that though. I've been a worker and saver since I was delivering newspapers and mowing lawns. One problem with that is still work too much and save. For what? Wait until 59.5, 65, 67? to stop working and enjoy the fruits?

I feel pretty fortunate to make decent scratch, have a few skills in demand and be in good place. But I still struggle with the balance. How much do I spend now vs save for some day down the road? As said, its not about the cool car/boat/whatever but what does the toy/thing enable? Fun with friends at the track or racing the boat in the bay with friends are a lot harder without a track car or sailboat. I dont need a Cayman but it would be cool. But, whats the opportunity cost? Sucks to think that way sometimes.

Anyway, thanks for the advice and its great to hear some success stories. So much BS flying back and forth these days I like the positive threads!

fintstone 10-24-2019 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VincentVega (Post 10635169)
This sure took a turn.

Its pretty refreshing to hear about you old guys :) that have figured out how to make it work. I have a ways to go but hopefully not that long. I guess I could pack up, move to the midwest and call it. I sure hope there is more to it than that though. I've been a worker and saver since I was delivering newspapers and mowing lawns. One problem with that is still work too much and save. For what? Wait until 59.5, 65, 67? to stop working and enjoy the fruits?

I feel pretty fortunate to make decent scratch, have a few skills in demand and be in good place. But I still struggle with the balance. How much do I spend now vs save for some day down the road? As said, its not about the cool car/boat/whatever but what does the toy/thing enable? Fun with friends at the track or racing the boat in the bay with friends are a lot harder without a track car or sailboat. I dont need a Cayman but it would be cool. But, whats the opportunity cost? Sucks to think that way sometimes.

Anyway, thanks for the advice and its great to hear some success stories. So much BS flying back and forth these days I like the positive threads!

Yep. There is always someone that wants to attack someone else that might have worked smarter or harder...or just did something they chose not to do themselves.

Personally, I don't want retirement to be a time of hardship..so I intend to work until I am relatively sure that will not be the case. It seems that when folks have to return to the workforce later through necessity, they just don't have the same opportunities as before (due to age, lack of network or currency, etc.). Despite the WalMart greeter jokes, no one really wants to do that for min wage. It seems to me that the best assurance of having enough is to either reduce the number of retired years by working longer and/or to protect yourself with assets that will likely keep up with inflation (or better). Owning your home outright/no bills is a good start. Rental properties and index funds seem to be great hedges as well.

I too am torn, as I live pretty frugally and invest a lot of my income (newest car is 2004 that I bought used...and my wife drives a 2001. I wonder sometimes how much we have missed by working so hard and watching our pennies. We will likely have more in retirement than when working.

Yes, all the happy retirees here are inspiring. I hope to join them soon.

fintstone 10-24-2019 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tdw28210 (Post 10635154)
Sorry, you're reading it wrong. We're talking total comp here, not just salaries. And I am pretty comfortable saying 1000's of government workers (including federal workers) have some sort of criminal record. Drug use too.

Maybe you should apply if that is the case. There are over 10,000 jobs advertised right now and many are very difficult to fill. Sounds like almost anyone qualifies...and the compensation is better than elsewhere. Why the hesitation?

Jim Richards 10-24-2019 07:47 PM

V^2, we didn’t travel much until retirement, maybe a nice (typically domestic) trip every few years or so. We’re doing more now, mostly internationally, since we have more time & resources. 2 incomes helped us get to where we’re at now. We have the sailboat & the sports car, but might cut loose the sailboat next year (wife’s getting seasick more nowadays) and throw $$ at a RV.

I don’t think scraping together every penny so you can start to enjoy it at 65 or so is the best approach for everyone. Maybe periodically enjoying your self along the way and retiring a few years later is good for some of you guys that are thinking ahead about retirement. One of my brothers passed away about a year before he was planning on retiring. He was thrifty and didn’t do that much during his working years. You never know...

Superman 10-24-2019 07:48 PM

Good for you, Sammy. Your head seems in the right place. On this topic. .)

I friend discovered a lump in his neck. Doctor suggested he get his 'affairs' in order. Turned out to be a simple cyst. By that time, he had learned he would make more in retirement than working (three pensions). Great guy. Johnny.

Income is relative. If retirement and net wealth numbers were discussed here, some would be shocked at others' high incomes. Others would shake their heads at the low incomes. But one thing I hear consistently is that retirement is about peace of mind. Contentment. I have not heard one single person report it was a big mistake. wink....

I'm 62 and still working, for now. I plan to work a bit longer, but not much. I would rather not. I would rather travel.

I have heard one piece of advice others have reported to be good advice: Do not get project lined up, then start them instead of your ex job. Chill first. Meditate. Take walks and smell the air. Read. Then decide.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.