![]() |
Also, if 6' "social distancing" and puny masks work so well then shouldn't the drop off in deaths be MUCH sharper?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
There is a significant lag time between initial infection, display of symptoms (5-10 days), progressive disease leading to death (another 10-20 days or longer depending on intervention). Retrace this disease progression back from peak deaths to their point of infection and it was well before lockdown. Exponential spread probably got going around March 1st with max infections just before lockdown. A full 30 days after lockdown and the death curve is falling rapidly just as one might expect. Shutting down NY greatly reduced the spread even though they were 2 weeks too late. I do enjoy that you keep trotting out Fergusen as the sole reason everything went to hell. The one epidemiologist who got this completely wrong at every level. It's very cute but it removes all credibility from your posts. Carry on! SmileWavy |
Quote:
I understand your simplistic model BUT it does not explain this http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1591245331.JPG |
Quote:
it is also true that even 1 week would have made a large difference for NYC |
Quote:
I mentioned him twice (and as a failure) and linked to his eating crow on Sweden. My over-reaching point being that even a pro is a fool to use such a simple model. ...and then there you are with your condescending; Oh, this is so simple here if'n you was smrat enough to understand that 7.5+15 =22.5. :rolleyes: |
Quote:
Your exponential models were right and 2.2 million Americans have died from this.:rolleyes: |
Quote:
I'm going to steal both of your quotes, LOL. |
Are we insulting people who disagree with us?
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website