So many things that do not add up in that video:
1. There is no mention of the research of Katalin Karikó and Drew Weissman who laid the groundwork in mRNA technology. Dr. Malone had nothing to do with this research - yet he is taking the credit for inventing the vaccine? He's either lying, or taking credit for something he didn't fully develop.

https://www.statnews.com/2020/11/10/the-story-of-mrna-how-a-once-dismissed-idea-became-a-leading-technology-in-the-covid-vaccine-race/

2. "Serial entrepreneur" (the credentials given to Steve Kirsch, the man on the right) is not someone I would go to if I were seeking a deeper understanding of mRNA technology. I'd maybe consult. oh, I dunno, a scientist??? Same applies to someone with a PhD in Evolutionary Biology. Closer, but I would rather seek out a scientist who deals with infectious, communicable diseases.

3. Steve Kirsch mentioned that he witnessed two people who suffered complications after getting the mRNA Covid vaccine. Two people. That is a very miniscule sample set. Yes- there are people who have had complications from the vaccine, but those are what the scientific world calls outliners, and not the norm. As a matter of fact, my friend's wife has bells palsy which likely was triggered by the vaccine.

4. Dr. Malone refers to talking with individuals at the FDA. Never referenced a name or department - always referred to them as "they," "he," "she," ..etc. RED FLAG. When someone tries to authenticate their story using anonymous "name dropping" the probability that their claims are true is very low in my book.

5.. According to this article in Reuters, that video propagates false information:
Source: https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-vaccine-cytotoxic/fact-check-covid-19-vaccines-are-not-cytotoxic-idUSL2N2O01XP

Bottom line: there is no scientific evidence that what they are saying in your video has any truth to it.

I just wish the bastard would quit taking credit for all of my hard work in creating the mRNA vaccines! I'm gonna have to file a lawsuit!

naysayers/non vaxxers best get used to the idea of staying in their "home country".

Move this to PARF so that we may take our gloves off.

Yeah, but then I'm gonna get the "Reported posts" emails, folks are going to be called poopy-heads, then finger-pointing, then bans and counter-bans, followed by "...human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together...mass hysteria!" ;)

Wouldn't it be better to just keep it here when we can keep the politics out of the conversation, and keep it more civil? Um - don't answer that...

And that is why better minds than myself are in charge...
I just stick my hand in the blender full on.

(btw I would probably agree with most of the above regarding Malone. The details tend to sort themselves out)

Sorry I haven't been keeping up but are you still pimping Hydroxychloroquine?

Are you still denying Hydroxychloroquine?
Fauci didn't. Before he did.

Maybe it should be voted in to see what's in it?

Yep. But you're gonna have to help me with your reference to voting something in??

The word used in his reference wasn't voting but instead pass.

As in, you'll just have to pass your bowel movement to know what is in it.

Let’s vote on scientific research!! The data that is most popular and gets the most votes is “conclusive.”

I thought you created the whole idea of RNA, not just the vaccines?

It is part of the solution for early treatment of COVID, along with ivermectin, steroids, zinc….and should not have been suppressed by big Pharma to get emergency use of the vaccine. Many more lives could have been saved before vaccines became widely available. But there was an obvious agenda at play for pushing the vaccines and suppressing all the prophylactic treatments.

https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/hydroxychloroquine-does-not-benefit-adults-hospitalized-covid-19#:~:text=A%20National%20Institutes%20of%20Health ,benefit%20to%20hospitalized%20patients. Found to be equally effective. http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1624672064.jpg http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1624672064.jpg

Something I have wondered about.

If someone has a bad reaction to a vaccine - let's say something bad enough to hospitalize them - what legal recourse do they have to obtain financial recourse to compensate them for their damages?

Also, are people require to sign a waiver when they sign up for a vaccination - releasing anyone from legal recourse, in the event of a bad outcome?

Let's just say that in the book they wrote about me I said let there be light. :D

The answer is: None.

There is zero liability for the pharma manufacturer. That was signed into law.

All the "vaccines" (except J&J) are not actually vaccines iirc.
They are genetic modifiers in the experimental stage and still currently for "emergency use only" per the FDA.
And the efficacy is still very questionable.

That is the troubling part.

Manufacturers are immune from civil lawsuits for most vaccines, under USC 300aa-22: Standards of Responsibility that was passed in the 80's. Covid vaccines under the PREP Act. An exception being willful misconduct. There are government programs that can used for compensation.

CIPC
https://www.hrsa.gov/cicp/about

VICP
https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccine-compensation/index.html

OK thanks, guys.

Doesn't seem fair to me, but what do I know?

Maybe this is SOP.

I'll pay $10 to the person who best predicts what people will be quarreling covidwise in 2022.
I'll pay $100 to the person who best predicts what people will be quarreling covidwise in 2023.
$1000 in 2024... etc...


Post it here. If you win, remind me, and I will PayPal your a$$*.


*If I feel like it