I'm thinking I wouldn't say that.

If they infringe on my constitutional freedom of choice on vaccine then lets take the next step to stop the pandemic of gun violence and start stop & search for illegal guns. Fair trade?

Well the argument for both is the same.

I think that was very early on in a rapidly developing pandemic.

And now that we know that it is aerosolized (not spittle)

This makes what he was saying even more true.

Mask mandates have been an epic fail. (other than for feeding and caring for psychotic fear in others)

People are told "wear a mask, and then you can go shopping."


http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1628052872.jpg

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1628052872.JPG

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/Vtz8lRIANoQ?start=52" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

https://youtu.be/Vtz8lRIANoQ?t=52

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/support/smileys/clap.gifhttp://forums.pelicanparts.com/support/smileys/clap.gifhttp://forums.pelicanparts.com/support/smileys/clap.gifhttp://forums.pelicanparts.com/support/smileys/clap.gif so spot on

I posted this elsewhere, it’s appropriate for this thread, too.

Warning! Big words and a requirement for advanced reading comprehension ahead:

https://thecritic.co.uk/issues/october-2020/democracy-muzzled/

“There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them..”

Aldous Huxley

If vaccines for polo, diphtheria, and other ailments are mandatory for (for example) admittance to public school, I don't understand the resistance to making a Covid-19 vaccination in the same category.

To clarify: the vaccines were approved via an "emergency use" authorization, which means a very large amount of data rather than a huge amount of data. There is a big difference between "emergency use authorization" which is based on large amounts of data and a humanitarian device exemption which is used only for rare diseases (affecting fewer than 2000,000 people).

The only reason why the vaccination is not yet mandatory (as of this writing) for the US military is because of pentagon bureaucracy. I strongly suspect it will be mandatory quite soon.

It really appears that Pfizer is going to get full authorization within the next month or so. Moderna within 2.

Once they get full approvsl the military will make them mandatory.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/04/politics/austin-pentagon-vaccine-mandate/index.html

BREAKING: At the direction of President Biden, Defense Secretary Austin to make COVID-19 vaccine mandatory for all active duty troops - CNN

lol..
this is when ya want to be..
or know your medic..
hey Doc....they will say..
fix's me up..
good times...

Rika

I know they have been gearing up at Ft Sill. I am surprised they aren't waiting for full approval.

It is also notable that is is quite legal for employers to require vaccination as a condition of employment. No one is forcing anyone to get the COVIS-19 vaccine, but it can be made a requirement the same as personal protective equipment, clocking in at a certain time, etc.

To all who don't get the vaccine, I have to ask: Do you stop at stop signs and red lights? If so why, as this is a government-mandated rule for your safety and that of others?

Here is one reason. I'm sure if I searched I could find Biden and Cuomo saying the same thing.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/p7WD8l0Dc1I" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

edit:

Just like that here is POTUS saying not mandatory and masks not mandatory. FF to 1:50

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ob3ER7fKeDs" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

edit 2.0

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/DsCIrNUnNMI" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

FF to 7:45 or thereabouts

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/VtndOa-3-Yg" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Clip from a SciFi series on Prime. Counterpart. Loved the series. In Berlin there is a viral outbreak that results in a very large number of the population dying. At end of the scene a guy walks in to speak with the woman sitting in theater. He places his hands under a UV type device to sanitize.

Pretty freaky considering how things are going these days. Filmed in 2018 or prior.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/qWi9_gD4dmY" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

I was around for the Anthrax mandate. There were officers and enlisted that objected. It didn't go well for them.

https://www.militarytimes.com/news/pentagon-congress/2021/06/17/troops-who-refused-anthrax-vaccine-paid-a-high-price/

How can I make my own judgements, I am not a virologist?

Shooting the messenger, like claiming cab cannot critique the guy because he doesn't have the background? Did you bother to interpret his message, or just judge the messenger on that one?

He has a habit of shooting the messenger, rather than even looking at what he had to say, much less evaluating it. I’m always more impressed when people debate the points that are made, not who made them. I tend to not respect the opinion of anybody that dismisses things out of hand, especially when they are not in anything close to the relevant field.

Half of the liberals here, if not more, refuse to even look at any link that comes from a conservative website. It doesn’t matter what the information is, the mere fact that it was posted, or cross-posted, on the conservative site is enough for them do not even look at it. The site may have absolutely nothing to do with what’s posted there, they are just quoting it from somewhere else. Nonetheless, because it briefly landed on a conservative page, it becomes a legitimate in their minds.

I can’t imagine you supporting that sort of asinine behavior but go ahead, prove me wrong.