Interesting Info About The 917
 

https://youtu.be/Jk4rQH-yYho



Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

914 and 917, this picture always sort of blows me away a bit, sitting next to that HUGE 914

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1649905281.jpg

^^^ exactly!!! Can ya just imagine flying at 220 mph down the Mulsanne Straight in that tiny 917??? [emoji33]

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

So who is this guy who regurgitates all the stuff he read in the books?
Most of these VinWiki story tellers all seem to be hitching off stories about other people and make it sound like they were there when it happened.

He's not adding any info that isn't already widely known, all he does is build up a story from all the other well known sources and tells it like he's uncovered some kind of unique and amazing thing his own damn self.
Comments on youtube


"Another Legendary John Ficarra Story I could Listen To His Stories All Day Long"
"Talked to Ficarra about this at the Amelia. Great to finally see the story."
"yey, another masterpiece for sure , Historic Racing story by John"
"Ficarra is such a great storyteller. Love his in-depth knowledge."
"I could listen to John telling old school racing Storys for hours!"

please what a fanboy club that vinwiki youtube channel

Wow dude, tell us how ya really feel.


FWIW, I didn't know any of the things he was talking about and found the information to be entertaining regardless of who was telling the "story".

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

ok, well then clearly you haven't ready any books on Porsche then? or Seen any websites or read any articles on it?
I would think that's the exception for a forum full of Porsche fans

it's ok..

good start https://www.amazon.com/Porsche-Racing-Cars-History-Competition/dp/076030727X

Yeah, this picture always blows my mind as well. Seeing a 917 in a picture by it's self looks giant. Then you see it next to something else and you see just how small it is.

That's a bit uncalled for. Aren't all historians regurgitating information and isn't all "widely known" information just regurgitated information? I don't know this guy or HobieMarty or their ages. I like this guys excitement about the development and accomplishment that is the 917 and I don't think he is trying to make it sound like her was there. Yes all the information he is spewing is available in a 1000 different sources, but he is brining that information to life.

This may be a forum of car guys with a common bond around the Porsche mark but many don't know the history of the mark or many of the cars and many are younger guys just getting started. A few years back I posted about the thirtieth anniversary of Al Holbert's death. Many on here had no idea who he was let alone held the record in IMSA wins for a time in a 962 and his father Bob Holbert was instrumental in developing the 934/935.

I was only four when the 917 first raced, I didn't have the opportunity to see this car race in it's day. In my day the regurgitated stories came in the form of Excellence or road and track once a month or the occasional story on wide world of sports. I was fortunate to see the 911, 934, 935, 962 in their hay day but even then 99% of the information came in the form of some other guy regurgitating information.

Who is this guy Bill Oursler? One of his books was written in 2000 the other 2005. Isn't he regurgitating information available in 1000 different places in the thirty years prior to the first book and this guy wants you to pay $21.00 or one book and $84.00 for the other.

The story in the video was free and I will bet more entertaining.

I agree. It's the way the story is told that adds the value. If you are not exposed to the info, it's simply a bonus.

Below is something we are familiar with (9/11) but this guy with six million subscribers tells a really good story. That's all he does is tell stories about stuff that people already know about.

Video is age restricted because of the graphic descriptions.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0azXES3MKew

Here's a random one from him that is not age restricted.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tul0S0xFzh8

Stijn seems to have gotten quite a bit grumpier in his old age. I don't remember him being this grumpy 10 years ago. This is not the first time that he's yelled "you damn kids! Get off my lawn!"

I have to say, I agree with Stijn, that was a bit cringeworthy. He clearly is just regurgitating what he remembers of what he read. He gets some of the technical details wrong, which means he doesn’t understand them and he has no idea how to pronounce John Wyers name, or that of Ferdinand Piech…

It makes it a bit hard to listen to.

Honestly, I'm not sure that I know how to pronounce either of those names correctly. I've only ever read them. I assume Wyer is like "why-er" and I assume Piech is something like "peach."

I haven't watched more than a few secs of the video. It is a bummer when technical details are wrong, especially for something like the 917 where the details are probably available in 1000 different places.

Thanks.

He tells the story in a way that makes it sound he was on the inside of everything, when he wasn't.
You can almost tell which books he's reading from, he tells details that are out of context and presented wrong.. The whole Long tail low drag vs short tail drag was a fight between Piech who would not allow even to test it and Wyer who had to go behind Piech's back to get testing done.

The moving suspension/aero linkage, he mentions it as if it was a valid setup they planned ot use or used.. but that's just nonsense it never used or allowed in racing.

He also calls it a long tail short tail design from the start, but those were never called short tails, they were all long tails.. just different variants for different tracks.

Most of these vinwiki story tellers, are very good at hyping and making it sound like they are the coolest mofo's in the car world. When quite frankly they aren't. They are just hyping


And yes, I do get grumpy when I see people claim history as their own, and then give it their own personal twist and add nothing but factual mistakes.

pie ech

why er seems right to me, he says weer or wier

And btw, I've been to the Porsche museum.. if the group asked a Question.. That the factory guide couldn't answer.. I answered it
I spent WAAAAAY to much time on pelicanparts 10 years ago

Wyer is pronounced like a two syllable version of wire. “Y er”

Piech is closer to “pee eck”

I had a motel room next door to Vic Elford. I did not know that until I rode down the elevator to the talk he was to give to a group about his days of racing for the factory. He discussed driving the 917. Her said if they turned the boot to the levels the mechanics said to run it at they were 20 MPH faster down the Mulsanne Straight. If he needed to pass a few more cars to have a clear shot at the corner, he would crank up the boost, and blow past the competitors 40 MPH faster that the other cars.

They ran with a different headlight color and shape from the other cars so they could be seen in rear view mirrors. The rest of the pack learned not to pull out to pass if the 917 was coming through.
He said one time he was hurtling along at over 220 and some driver pulled out to pass a much slower car on the Mulsanne Straight and he had to go further over, with two wheels in the grass. In those days there was just grass, trees and no real barrier. He said a couple had set up a table and were drinking wine at the small table as he went past at well over 200 MPH with two wheels in the grass and just a few feet from them. He said I figured that was a bit to exciting for them because on the next lap they had moved back a lot.

They did not run a boosted 917 at Le Mans…