speeder |
10-13-2022 10:19 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by masraum
(Post 11820926)
Isn't ethanol less energetic, and has the effect of raising octane which reduces likelihood of knock. If you're going to have knock with 87octane 10%ethanol, you're going to have knock with 87octane 0% ethanol, right. So ethanol vs none doesn't really change knock characteristics for a given octane rating.
So whether running 87 or premium (91, 92, 93) it makes no difference if it's got ethanol or not (from a knock point of view).
|
This is correct. No difference.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GH85Carrera
(Post 11820929)
Old cars biggest vulnerability was the old rubber hoses that ethanol ate up. Once updated to new alcohol resistant hoses, no big deal if the car is driven regularly. It is a big deal if it sits over the winter and water condensation is high. Ethanol is corrosive, and can damage fuel system parts.
Talk to any small engine (lawn equipment) engine repair. They will have lots of horror stories of Mr. average homeowner that lets gasohol sit in the equipment over the winter. Especially in older lawn equipment. I have a 3.5 HP edger I use on the 1/4 mile of edging at my house. It was bought new in 1988. Starts on the first pull. It has never seen gasohol.
So yea, all modern cars, no problem at all with E10. Even my 85 911, no problem but the rubber hoses are all replaced.
|
I've been hearing this forever and it's BS in my vast experience. I've owned or worked on over 100 cars since the advent of ethanol fuel and the truth is that old fuel lines dry out and leak while newer ones do not...regardless of ethanol in fuel. I just put an MG back in service last month that had been sitting for over 30 years, in Minnesota. Minnesota still has non-ethanol fuel available in 2022 and the 1975 MGB owners manual specifies no unleaded fuel, much less ethanol. Obviously, this requirement became impossible at the pumps shortly after the car was built.
Anyhow, all of the fuel lines were old and needed to be replaced. It was obvious that they were dangerous and would have leaked, because they were old. I've never seen fuel lines that were not old leak on any vehicle, with very rare exceptions that had nothing to do with ethanol. Old rubber fuel hoses dry out and leak, period. Including on diesel vehicles, all the time, which do not have ethanol in their fuel. Small amounts, (10%), ethanol in fuel will never make good fuel hoses leak. Every gasoline vehicle on the road in CA would be leaking fuel. It's an old wives tale with zero validity.
I hate that we are forced to buy ethanol fuel because it's inferior from a mpg standpoint and I think that the whole ethanol subsidy program to corn farmers is massive govt. corporate welfare but the leaking fuel line argument is BS.
|