Hyperborean Pyramid Reactor

[Jeff Higgins]

Been geeking out on the pyramids in Egypt lately. None of the standard explanations have ever made sense to me. From an engineering point of view, their existence is simply impossible with what we know about what was available to us at the time they were built. Hell, it would likely be well neigh impossible to build them even today, with modern methods and technologies. The sheer mass of some of the blocks (80 tons!) along with their precise, almost air-tight fit in some of the inner chambers. No way was this done with the tools of the day.

So, here is an interesting, and quite different take on at least the first one, the Great Pyramid of Giza. Its construction is, from an engineering and architectural standpoint, superior to those that followed. Much more precisely fit, especially in those critical inner chambers. These folks contend that this is due to the fact that it was first, and was the only one built by the original architects, with the others being later attempts to duplicate its functionality.

What function would that be? How about the production of plutonium. These folks make an interesting case for that. Kinda long, but worth the read.

https://originalscientist.blogspot.com/2013/05/were-pyramids-nuclear-reactors.html?m=1

[rcooled]

That's some pretty wild speculation, but it went completely off the rails when they said this: "The logical answer is obvious: the plutonium was taken off planet. Barring travel to another solar system, the rational destination could only be Mars."

This theory, like others about the pyramids and other ancient structures, fails to give enough credit to human ingenuity, resourcefulness and intelligence.

[Sooner or later]

Crazy, man, just crazy...

[Alan A]

If it’s that easy why do we have to store the waste underground?

[rcooled]

Originally Posted by Alan A

If it’s that easy why do we have to store the waste underground?

It was only easy for the Martians...

[Alan A]

Originally Posted by rcooled

It was only easy for the Martians...

Easy for them to move plutonium but killed by Indian love call. Odd people those martians.

[masraum]

I'm open to any explanation if someone can come up with a good explanation that seems plausible and has any sort of reasonably believable evidence even if it's circumstantial.

I have always found what I'd call ancient history interesting. I've always thought when I saw a show or read an article and some scientist proclaimed something like "that's not possible," or "people of the time were primative and couldn't have ____" or something like that, that the scientist was likely a bad scientist. I think there's too much evidence/artifacts/stuff from long, long ago that we can't explain to discount that men were primitive and couldn't do things just because no one today knows how it was done.

The pyramids, stonehenge, some of the stone work in the new world where stones fit together super tightly, etc... are too wide spread for them to be impossible.

[Jeff Higgins]

Heh heh, yup, all in good fun. I see the aliens thing, and particularly the Mars connection, as kind of a "red herring", maybe intentionally so. The discussion regarding the fit and finish of 80 ton blocks, some elevated to 400 feet in the air, is what intrigues me. We really have no rational explanation for that, how it was accomplished in period. Like i said, we would have one hell of a time doing it today, with the precision demonstrated at least in the Giza pyramid. Thousands and thousands of people forced into slave labor ain't gonna do it, no matter how many of them at your disposal, nor how long you have to sustain such an effort. Yet that seems to be the go-to "explanation".

Giza is in a far, far different league than things like Stonehenge and similarly "small" structures wherein it would be entirely conceivable that man and animal "power", intelligently applied, could actually raise the stones in place. Precise fitting of smaller stones is equally explainable, with skilled masons working by hand. I've explored Stonehenge, many Roman ruins, Mayan and Inca ruins, Medieval ruins, and the like (one of the more satisfying benefits of my world travels while fixing airplanes). None of them even come close to Giza. It combines the "best of the best" of all of them, from the precise fit to its incredible accuracy of shape and dimension. Then it trumps them all through the sheer size of its component parts. It would be a challenge even today, with modern machinery, survey equipment, and all of that.

[Superman]

You're really unhinged right now Jeff. Seek some help.

Okay....just kidding. I suspect they had a genius. Da Vinci was like that. Einstein. Newton.

He designed the 'mids and the construction method. And now, those records are just.....lost.

[Jeff Higgins]

I just wish he had kept better notes.

[Dixie]

[Pazuzu]

Why assume the blocks were moved and fitted like that?

What if Giza was just a big mountain, that was carved away? The stone fitting was created by running diamond encrusted wires down like a jeweler's saw.

Easy peasy, a couple dozen artisans could do that in a decade.

[Jeff Higgins]

Originally Posted by Pazuzu

Why assume the blocks were moved and fitted like that?

What if Giza was just a big mountain, that was carved away? The stone fitting was created by running diamond encrusted wires down like a jeweler's saw.

Easy peasy, a couple dozen artisans could do that in a decade.

The inner chambers are constructed of precisely cut and fitted blocks of a different material than the outer structure. Some of the heaviest blocks are surrounding these inner chambers. Some are set at odd angles, not flat, nor parallel to the blocks of the surrounding structure.

That, and the outer blocks are laid as we do on many modern day brick walls, wherein the blocks on the next layer up are centered on the gaps between the blocks on the next layer down.

Additionally, there are no deposits of these various materials to be found locally. These materials were transported some distance. One would expect to fins similar, untouched "mountains" nearby, but we do not. Not even the same substrate.

[rcooled]

Originally Posted by Superman

I suspect they had a genius.

Yes, and more than just one. The designers and builders of megalithic structures were just as intelligent as their modern counterparts are today...they just had a vastly different level of technology to work with.

And what's almost as amazing as these structures themselves, is the ancient's ability to organize and communicate with a massive labor force, both skilled and unskilled alike, in order to even attempt projects on such a colossal scale. And in some cases, like at Teotihuacan, near Mexico City, it's believed the builders didn't even have a written language.

[Pazuzu]

Originally Posted by Jeff Higgins

The inner chambers are constructed of precisely cut and fitted blocks of a different material than the outer structure. Some of the heaviest blocks are surrounding these inner chambers. Some are set at odd angles, not flat, nor parallel to the blocks of the surrounding structure.

That, and the outer blocks are laid as we do on many modern day brick walls, wherein the blocks on the next layer up are centered on the gaps between the blocks on the next layer down.

Additionally, there are no deposits of these various materials to be found locally. These materials were transported some distance. One would expect to fins similar, untouched "mountains" nearby, but we do not. Not even the same substrate.

Duh...they GREW the stone right there, over many years, from various materials. That's like saying "You can't have a redwood in your front yard, you're in Wyoming".

They grew the mountain, over many years, from various materials as needed to produce the multiple types of stone. Then, they used the diamond encrusted wires to slice into the stone to make the tight fitting junctions.

Come on, if you're going to trust aliens, then you can trust that people grew mountains.

[Zeke]

I always figured Stonehenge was built with dirt ramps. Maybe paved somehow. Same with a lot of those structures. It's kinda like Pazuzu says in removing the surroundings I just think that the surroundings could have been built as well. Maybe that is too simple.

[Dixie]

[BK911]

Pyramids are MUCH older than we are lead to believe.
Sound, vibration and frequency.