Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   EVs didn't get better, ICE cars just turned to fat lard (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/1163508-evs-didnt-get-better-ice-cars-just-turned-fat-lard.html)

David Inc. 06-26-2024 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KNS (Post 12272742)
I keep hearing people on this thread saying "Americans want big cars and trucks". Some do yes, but many don't. Some want a basic work truck, they don't need or want the monstrosities that are offered right now. But the choices are slim.

But more people do want bigger vehicles, and there's more profit to bigger vehicles which incentivizes manufacturers to market and push more big vehicles than small vehicles, until more becomes most becomes only.

I remember looking at the F150 numbers compared to Maverick numbers and it wasn't even close.

If people wanted more small trucks than big trucks then that's what would be made, but they don't. There's still a market for the smaller ones but it's only a fraction of the market that's dominated by big boy trucks.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tobra (Post 12272827)
What I want to buy is not offered in this country.

They are not selling people what they want, they are selling what has the best profit

Psssst... They have the best profit because people are willing to pay more to get them because they want them the most.

aschen 06-26-2024 06:38 PM

Right mfgs are colliding against the public to force things on them they don't want. They work with in the regulations as they always have, to bring to market products that maximize profits. If small efficient inexpensive cars were in huge demand and profitable the free market would prevail. It's clearly possible to make these cars within the rule set. The general public just has bad taste in cars, they buy big, high trim, and are not debt adverse. Enthusiast complain about boring cars and buy used anyways.

red 928 06-26-2024 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wdfifteen (Post 12272531)
I was going to predict how many responses there would be before blaming of the government would start. I had 5, the number was 2 including the OP.

Well duh, even the dimmest of bulbs would realize
that this is a fairly well-informed and intelligent group.
Of course the truth would be presented in short time.

KFC911 06-27-2024 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tobra (Post 12272827)
What I want to buy is not offered in this country.

They are not selling people what they want, they are selling what has the best profit

^^^ This, this, this .... and more this.

KNS 06-27-2024 03:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tobra (Post 12272827)
They are not selling people what they want, they are selling what has the best profit

^^ I think this also is a big part of the reason cars have grown so much.

In any case the manufacturers are starting to hit a wall: Garage size and parking lot spaces. They really can't go too much bigger.

Harry Metcalfe (Harry's Garage) recently commented on how cars have gotten so large and the difficulty in maneuvering around European city streets.

David Inc. 06-27-2024 04:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aschen (Post 12272898)
Right mfgs are colliding against the public to force things on them they don't want. They work with in the regulations as they always have, to bring to market products that maximize profits. If small efficient inexpensive cars were in huge demand and profitable the free market would prevail. It's clearly possible to make these cars within the rule set. The general public just has bad taste in cars, they buy big, high trim, and are not debt adverse. Enthusiast complain about boring cars and buy used anyways.

Oof, I feel targeted. :D

But it's this, people want big stuff with lots of features, and don't mind taking out seven or eight year loans to do it. During the great recession people started shedding their big, gas-guzzling vehicles but as soon as gas prices cooled off and they could get loans again guess what they started buying?

cockerpunk 06-27-2024 06:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David Inc. (Post 12272535)
And deaths per mile are half what they were when that '86 came out. And those deaths/mile were half what they were in the 60s.

I'm okay with pudgier cars if it means more moms and dads making it home to their kids.

but you dont have to choose. the 86 and the ND both are very safe in crashes.

so it can be done, they are just choosing to not.

cockerpunk 06-27-2024 06:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arizona_928 (Post 12272702)
25 year old hilux. Dot and epa age out exemptions.

the reason they dont bring it here is the chicken tax.

cockerpunk 06-27-2024 06:08 AM

and diesels have died because they are dirty. the improved MPG doesn't matter, if each mile is dirtier than an equivalent gas mile.

they only reason they made a come back, is that companies were lying. thats called fraud. its a crime.

Arizona_928 06-27-2024 06:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cockerpunk (Post 12273098)
the reason they dont bring it here is the chicken tax.

I mean. After they jump through the hoops to have it epa and dot certified… add 25% tax please

Arizona_928 06-27-2024 06:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cockerpunk (Post 12273102)
and diesels have died because they are dirty. the improved MPG doesn't matter, if each mile is dirtier than an equivalent gas mile.

they only reason they made a come back, is that companies were lying. thats called fraud. its a crime.

Who defines what is dirty?

David Inc. 06-27-2024 06:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cockerpunk (Post 12273094)
but you dont have to choose. the 86 and the ND both are very safe in crashes.

so it can be done, they are just choosing to not.

Sure they can, but clearly the Miata and 86 are outliers in terms of design and target market.

cockerpunk 06-27-2024 06:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arizona_928 (Post 12273119)
Who defines what is dirty?

chemistry.

masraum 06-27-2024 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cockerpunk (Post 12273094)
but you dont have to choose. the 86 and the ND both are very safe in crashes.

so it can be done, they are just choosing to not.

Whether it's realistic or not, I believe that a huge majority of the population equates smaller with less-safe and larger with more-safe. Imagine an accident between a miata and an F350.

masraum 06-27-2024 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arizona_928 (Post 12273119)
Who defines what is dirty?

I'm pretty sure in the US the answer is "EPA" and to some extent "CARB". But I'm pretty sure that you knew that already.

masraum 06-27-2024 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David Inc. (Post 12273123)
Sure they can, but clearly the Miata and 86 are outliers in terms of design and target market.

Exactly.

But the miata and 86 sales are miniscule compared to "regular" vehicles.


miata yearly US sales
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1719523714.jpg

Toyota 86 yearly US sales
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1719523714.jpg

Toyota Corolla yearly US sales
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1719523714.jpg

Toyota Rav4 yearly US sales
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1719523714.jpg

aschen 06-27-2024 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by masraum (Post 12273412)
Whether it's realistic or not, I believe that a huge majority of the population equates smaller with less-safe and larger with more-safe. Imagine an accident between a miata and an F350.

Make no mistake in the event of a collision with another moving vehicle the smaller vehicle is less safe, other factors being equal.

Crash testing into a fixed barrier doesnt tell the complete story, and small vehicles are currently safer than older small vehicles but they are less safe in the event of an accident than larger vehicles.

Smaller vehicles are theoretically better at accident avoidance and less prone to rollover.


In general the common wisdom, that bigger vehicles are safer than smaller is mostly true. Certainly moderate sized vehicles are safer than tiny vehicles in aggregate, for vehicles built to contemporary standards.

Tobra 06-27-2024 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by masraum (Post 12273412)
Whether it's realistic or not, I believe that a huge majority of the population equates smaller with less-safe and larger with more-safe. Imagine an accident between a miata and an F350.

I do not have to imagine. There is no substitute for mass.

Physics does not care about your feelings.

p911dad 06-27-2024 03:41 PM

Yep. I've promoted sturdy SUV's to our kids (joking as urban assault vehicles) just for this reason, keep the babies safe. It's a physics thing. Parking in cities is another issue, of course.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.