Liberal Hero Richard Clarke changes story again

[fintstone]

After Bush was blamed by conspiracy theorists for letting Osama's family fly home..Richard Clarke who testified that he had refused the request now admits he was the approval authority. Caught in another lie. I wonder if the mainstream press or 60 minutes will pick this up or print a retraction?
Just proves that liberals will do anything to hurt the administration...or sell a book.

DAY OF INFAMY 2001
Clarke claims responsibility for bin Ladens' flight
Contradicts 9-11 panel testimony about depature of Osama's relatives
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: May 26, 2004
5:00 p.m. Eastern
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com
Former counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke says he is solely responsible for allowing members of Osama bin Laden's family to flee the United States immediately after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Richard Clarke

"I take responsibility for it. I don't think it was a mistake, and I'd do it again," Clarke told The Hill newspaper yesterday.

The Hill said a political controversy has been brewing over who approved the six controversial flights that carried 140 Saudi citizens.

At the time the members of the Saudi elite were allowed to leave, the Bush administration was preparing to detain Muslims in the U.S. as material witnesses to the attacks.

Democrat leaders, including Sen. Barbara Boxer of California, had been pressing members of the 9-11 Commission to find out, "Who authorized the flight[s] and why?"

A Democrat who attended a May 6 closed-door meeting of the panel quoted a panel member, former Rep. Lee Hamilton, D-Ind., as saying: "We don’t know who authorized it. We've asked that question 50 times."

Most of the 26 passengers aboard a Sept. 20, 2001, fight were relatives of Osama bin Laden, whom intelligence officials blamed for the attacks almost immediately after they happened, The Hill said.

Clarke told the paper responsibility for the Saudis' departure "didn't get any higher than me."

"On 9-11, 9-12 and 9-13, many things didn't get any higher than me," he said. "I decided it in consultation with the FBI."

But this new account of the events seemed to contradict Clarke's sworn testimony before the Sept. 11 commission at the end of March, The Hill said.

"The request came to me, and I refused to approve it," Clarke testified. "I suggested that it be routed to the FBI and that the FBI look at the names of the individuals who were going to be on the passenger manifest and that they approve it or not. I spoke with the – at the time – No. 2 person in the FBI, Dale Watson, and asked him to deal with this issue. The FBI then approved … the flight."

Panel member Tim Roemer said yesterday in response: "That's a little different than saying, 'I claim sole responsibility for it now.'"

Moreover, the FBI has denied approving the flight, according to the Capitol Hill paper.

FBI spokeswoman Donna Spiser said, "We haven't had anything to do with arranging and clearing the flights."

"We did know who was on the flights and interviewed anyone we thought we needed to," she said. "We didn’t interview 100 percent of the [passengers on the] flight. We didn't think anyone on the flight was of investigative interest."

The Hill said when Roemer asked Clarke during the commission's March hearing, "Who gave the final approval, then, to say, 'Yes, you’re clear to go, it's all right with the United States government,'" Clarke seemed to suggest it came from the White House.

"I believe after the FBI came back and said it was all right with them, we ran it through the decision process for all these decisions that we were making in those hours, which was the interagency Crisis Management Group on the video conference," Clarke testified. "I was making or coordinating a lot of the decisions on 9-11 in the days immediately after. And I would love to be able to tell you who did it, who brought this proposal to me, but I don't know. The two – since you press me, the two possibilities that are most likely are either the Department of State or the White House chief of staff's office."

Clarke told the Washington newspaper yesterday the furor over the flights is a "tempest in a teapot," arguing that since the attacks the FBI has never said any of the passengers should not have left.

"It's very funny that people on the Hill are now trying to second-guess the FBI investigation," Clarke said.

The 9-11 commission released a statement last month declaring the chartered flights were handled properly by the Bush administration, the Hill reported.

[techweenie]

WorldNetDaily.com

ROTFLMAO. News for people with tinfoil hats.

They must hold the record for their retractions of headline stories.

[araine901]

I thought that title was held by the NY times until they fired a couple of ripe ones last year for making stuff up. LOL

[Bleyseng]

A "right wing Wacko" news service......big deal. They make up more stuff than Bush does.

Geoff

[araine901]

But not quite as much as Clarke. LOL

[emcon5]

Originally posted by Bleyseng
A "right wing Wacko" news service......big deal. They make up more stuff than Bush does.

Yeah, that could be it.

http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/0526genrich0526.html

http://www.hillnews.com/news/052604/clarke.aspx

[techweenie]

When this was first posted, I couldn't find a single reference to it anywhere in the usual places. In fact, it's still not on Drudge, which I find amazing.

But it looks like the story is real, which is very disappointing. It's not like you'd forget something like that.

Since Bush Sr. was meeting with Osama's brother the morning of 9/11, it kinda made sense his kid would cut the family a break in getting together and skedaddling.

[Aurel]

I don`t know if you are like me, but I can find more links between the Bush family and the Bin Laden Family, hence between the Bush and Al Qaeda, than between Iraq and Al Qaeda. However it seems that the possible links between Iraq and Al Qaeda are more actively investigated, while the previous are more actively covered up.
I beleive that Richard Clarke knows much more than he wrote in his book, and the fact that he contradicted himself indicates that at first, he was still willing to be part of the cover up, while now, he changed his mind. And, if this is true, it did not make it into the big news, because it is not only embarassing for himself, but more importantly, for the administration he was working for.
Or, this is just pure disinformation from a right wing wacko website.
Evidently, if this was such a huge smoking gun that could help the administration, it would be all over the headline news.

Aurel

[BlueSkyJaunte]

Originally posted by Aurel
Evidently, if this was such a huge smoking gun that could help the administration, it would be all over the headline news.

Ah, yes. Our conservative-controlled media.

[Kevin Powers]

so i take it you read the whole book flint.