Not discrediting what your saying, but in post to other post provided in this post, say with the speed of inpact, and the heat of the fuel, the plane would have been disinagrated. This is a little confusing. How would we they know if it was a 757 ?

The really great thing about freedom of speech and threads like this is that the critical-thinkers in the group are quickly sorted.

Oh, and remember; always obey the laws of physics. (even if you don't understand them):cool:

Why do I always feel more secure in my sanity after reading these threads?

Forgive me for not being a Physics engineer. The laws of physics IMO are being debunked in this video. Im just asking for some sort of verification of the amount of info given in this video. You would actualy have to watch it, and not label it as another propaganda video, before any of the issues presented in the video can be debunked.

Hey, Im only asking for the issues that have been brought up in this video to be debunked.

Thats whats is being said by NYFD guys who were in the building, they are claiming they heard bombs going off AFTER the planes hit, while they were going up the elevators to the 26th floor. Other firemen are claiming in this video that they saw explosions from the buildings AFTER the planes hit, that looked like what demolition companies do to bring down a structure. Plus, there is a scene from CNN, of which was only showed once during a live broadcast, of a huge , 50 story tall plum of smoke on the ground of the world trade center, while they were still standing.

Plus, there were no WMDs in Iraq...

Aurel

Oh, there were planes, thats a givin. BUT, its being reported in this video, that it wasent a American Airlines that hit the second tower, but a cargo type plane, with a round blue emble, near the cockpit area,with no windows.

It pains me to see people try so hard to spin another reality. (too many Matrix movies I suppose)

I watched the video a year ago, or so. I also responded in one of those threads, early-on, about the physics/chemistry.
IF YOU WOULD READ those posts, as others have suggested, maybe you wouldn't have to go-off all pissy wondering why we are are being dissmisvive.

I guess he choses to ignore the identifiable 757 wreckage inside of the Pentagon.

Furthermore, how would a guy in an elevator, upon hearing a boom, know it was a bomb? Every heard structural parts give way in a stressed application? Makes quite a racket.

Paging reality... Paging reality... Anyone seen reality?

You know, your right. The video has not been debunked! The makers of the video have figured it out, they are super sleuths. I sure wish they would use those same"investigative" techniques to locate the passengers and crew lost in American 77.

This video and the others like it are junk!

Here is a real story about a reconstruction of the crash that "debunks" the "black helicopter" video http://news.uns.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/020910.Sozen.Pentagon.html

Oh, here is some video taken by security cameras on it too....

http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/03/07/gen.pentagon.pictures/


I can't believe I get drawn into this junk... but if I must.

Seems to me your the ones getting all pissy. Im clearly just asking for somebody to watch THIS video, and debunk it. Im NOT spreading anything, or claiming to be right, or this video to be right. IM not spinning anything.

Correction --it was over TWO YEARS AGO.

My response was:

,, Ya saw that story when it came out, also saw it posted on this site, amongst others. Still does not show a 757 flying into the building. The same video, or still photo`s are shows in this video.

I guess he's never seen how much airframe is left after a simple fire, never mind a crash. Looking more like a conspiracy theory troll here, maybe Red UFO has cloned?

For ME, the question isnt Where`s the plane, its, why isnt there any burning of the inside of the building , of which is shown is this video.

911S Targa:

Did you look at my post? Or is it like Col. Jessup said... YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH.

Come on. Is this really a question in your mind or is it do you find that argument without basis stimulates the neurons in your brain? You don't have to ask any of these questions about where's the fire, where's the plane or anything, just ask what happened to:

Paul Ambrose, Yemen Betru, M J Booth, Bernard Brown, Suzanne Calley, William Caswell, Sarah Clark, Asia Cotton, James Debeuneure, Rodney Dickens, Eddie Dillard, Charles Droz, Barbara Edwards, Charles Falkenberg, Zoe Falkenberg, Dana Falkenberg, James Ferguson, Budd Flagg, Dee Flagg, Richard Gabriel, Ian Gray, Stanley Hall, Bryan Jack, Steve Jacoby, Ann Judge, Chandler Keller, Yvonne Kennedy, Norma Khan, Karen Kincaid, Norma Langsteuerle, Dong Lee, Dora Menchaca, Chris Newton, Barbara Olson, Ruben Ornedo, Lisa Raines, Todd Reuben, John Sammartino, Diane Simmons, George Simmons, Mari Rae Sopper, Robert Speisman, Leonard Taylor, Sandra Teague, Leslie Whittington, John Yamnick, Vicki Yancey, Shuyin Yang, Yuguag Zheng.

Captain Charles Burlingame, First Officer David Charlebois; Flight Attendants Michele Heidenberger, Jennifer Lewis, Kenneth Lewis, Renee May

WAKE UP. It really happened. It happened the way you were told it did.

I can handle the truth just fine. I am awake. I never said it DIDNT happen. And sorry for questioning, and NOT accepting what some news organization feed me as ALL BE ALL TRUTH.

As Ive said, watch it, and dubunk was is being told.

Your right, I havent seen a airframe after a simple fire. Troll ? Ill take that as an insult, since Im only asking for some to watch the video, and explain WHY the theory is wrong.

Ive been on this board for over 3 years, and Ive NEVER trolled.

Prove I'm not a superhero, logic is a *****.