Ummm, because it bears no resemblance to what really happened? Did you stay up all night to put that together?

What other history would you like to re-write?

I'll bite....what "really" happened Shaun? And how did lil ole you get the intel?

P.S. get a grip on the rage and angst, it'll bite ya in the end good buddy.

Not necessarily.

As fint says, the law has a rather specific definition of "covert agent" and we don't know if she can be proven to fit that description. http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/casecode/uscodes/50/chapters/15/subchapters/iv/sections/section_426.html

My point about the prosecutor having collected so much infomation under oath, though, was that a perjury charge is also a possibility.

Listen to your coveted AAR and see that the extreme left isn't asking questions, they're conviced. Ask Shaun where he got his intel, he's convinced and he's apparently in the loop.

Fox is covering this better than CNN. Do a search. And like you said the other day, there's more to this than meets the eye. Stay tuned Len, but for god's sake keep away from history book publishers. We really don't need any more apologist hype for the Admin.

To review:

"is"

"last throes"

"not free"

"covert"

How does that answer my question? What really happened and how did you get that info? Or were you just talking outta your rear?

You implied I was an idiot for not knowing, so lets have it.

For once, do your own searches, info gathering.

LOL, how bout you just tell me how you know........ What's your connection that gives you grand jury intel?

Wilson published a book right before this all came out 2 yrs ago, next the whole Niger/Bush lied/wife outed comes out and Wilson sells lots of books, Wilson condradicts his own writings before the 9/11 commission and admits he exaturated(sp??) in his writings. Wilson keeps profits from book.

Sadly this sort of pattern seems to be the current MO of much of the publishing industry.

Len, you've got this really annoying habit (someone's got to tell you) of asking for info, which is then presented, then you don't believe it even though factually accurate. You are very close to Flint in this regard and it's gotten worse over the last year. Go do your own research on foxnews.com, then you'll believe it. Oh, and do a search on Trent Lott and ethics (you'll find some interesting info), or is that DeLay... there are so many to choose from.

Lets recap good buddy,

I laid out a scenerio.

You said it... and I quote "because it bears no resemblance to what really happened"

You don't explain how or why, or how you know. We should just accept your word as truth even though it is comon knowledge that no one in the public sector knows what really happened yet (present company excluded ofcourse:rolleyes: )

You are slipping my friend, just admit you made an attempt to be witty or an attempt to make me look silly and accomplished the reverse. You can't win em all Shaun.

We'll add "win" to the list.

Apparently the "company" she worked for may have been a CIA front, it may be that said company's exposure is at the root of this. It's possible that classified material was released into the wrong hands also.

While everyone condemns/defends Rove, I don't see any entertaining of the possibility that a seperate crime/situation was uncovered during the outing inquiries. Cop responds to domestic violence call, while there he uncovers meth lab; that sort of thing.

Watergate?

Plamegate or Rovegate maybe? I wonder how long we'll have to wait before shallowthroat is exposed.

So if I understand fint:

Wilson's claim that Saddam was not actively trying to buy uranium from Niger has not been refuted. But somehow Wilson was treasonous for stating that fact?

And somehow that justifies harming national security by outing a CIA operative whose agents are risking their lives to monitor WMD activities in the midddle east?

Can somebody please explain that to me?

Love it, I'm going to be using it.

Thanks.:)

I like Karlgate.

Anything ya can fit on a bumper sticker, right? :p