![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
CAFE fuel efficiency standards to be raised
http://www.cnn.com/2005/AUTOS/08/23/fuel_economy/index.html
Looks like the current admin is moving to raise the required fuel efficiency of SUVs and light trucks that have not been updated since the 70s. Discuss.
__________________
Matt J. 69 911T Targa - "Stinky" 2001 Boxster "Stahlgewehr" |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Docking Bay 94
Posts: 7,013
|
Too little - way too late.
__________________
Kurt |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
As I read it, these are very minor improvements, or perhaps are not improvements at all.
The new regulations divide the light truck market into six groups and sets fuel economy standards for each group, rather than requiring an automaker's entire light truck production to meet an overall fuel economy standard. This means that an automaker can concentrate on selling just the bigger and heavier SUVs and pickup trucks, that get the worst fuel economy. There won't be a need to also develop and sell the lighter, more fuel efficient vehicles to balance out the gas-guzzlers. For example, GM could concentrate on Suburbans and Hummers (actually I think the Hummer might even be exempt from CAFE) and not bother to market smaller SUVs or develop hybrid SUVs. This looks like a CAFE standard written by Detroit lobbyists.
__________________
1989 3.2 Carrera coupe; 1988 Westy Vanagon, Zetec; 1986 E28 M30; 1994 W124; 2004 S211 What? Uh . . . “he” and “him”? |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brooklyn, USA
Posts: 1,908
|
This is like something the Soviets would have thought up.
Safety and emissions regulations the business of the Feds? Maybe. But this a load of horses%*t. Where is that libertarian thread? I want to sign up. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 4,868
|
Quote:
‘bout time!
__________________
Downshift |
||
![]() |
|