Look at your two pictures above that YOU posted, then think about what I wrote:

Ok, this is what I've observed.

Mulholland makes up his mind and that's it. It doesn't matter if evidence contradicts what he's decided.....it falls under "conspiacy."

So, for example, he knows Kofi was involved, has nothing to prove this, so that falls under conspiracy. He knows Delay is innocent, has nothing to prove this, so that falls under conspiracy. (sidenote, I cannot claim either way on Delay, I have not seen evidence, so I am not claiming guilt or innocence either way, this is just an obvservation on how Mul's mind works.) If Delay is innocent, he'll be vindicated, if Delay is guilty, it'll be a conspiracy. The media reports something he does not like, it's a lying conspiracy. Bush makes a poor decision, it's a conspiracy, he really made a good decision, but it's some conspiracy.

Sounds like "facts fixed around policy." He makes a conclusion, and will fit "conspiracy" where needed as a way to "substantatiate" this conclusion. I sure hope you're not a scientist Mul.

Mul, the whole world is not some sort of conspiracy out to get you my friend...


With those two pictures, you've completely proven my statements above.

And one doesn't need estrogen to live in a non-delusional world.

I cannot wait to see the two of you in Vegas... This could be fun!

JoeA

LOL

Aww you know how it is when we all meet.....what "arguments?" Political discussion is such a teeny part of us....there is so much more to us than just this. And face-to-face with body language, it comes off differently than it does in print. Im smiling as I'm typing things, I'm just an energetic person, but it comes across differently in print.

We'll probably all just laugh our butts off.

But lookie at this....

Who was saying about the "single conspiracy charge" was "proof" this is all fake?

Got a money laundering one now...

A Texas grand jury has indicted US Representative Tom DeLay on a charge of money laundering, the second indictment against the Texan who stepped aside last week as the second-ranking Republican in the US House of Representatives.

http://seven.com.au/news/topstories/111266


I dunno, but it is not looking good for your boy. I look forward to trial time and to see the evidence.....

Who was in charge of the investigation?

Put down the cool_aid...Just because the UN lawyers and Kofi Annan were able to obstruct justice with the best scumbag lawyer's advice in the world, does not mean he did not do it...He knew that he was doing it and he orchestrated it...cripes, he even put his son in charge of the scam.

For example, do you imagine the smartest couple ever to stain the White House had NO IDEA that they were receiving campaign contributions from the Chinese military?...I understand full well that a key player is dead (Ron Brown--suicide by plane crash), but do you seriously think team-Clinton had no knowledge of fund-raising irregularities?

http://www.strangecosmos.com/images/content/107560.jpg

Do you see what I mean?...Let me guess, you think OJ was innocent because he was acquited?...Just imagine the power of the Presidency and a political appointee (Janet Reno) in your back pocket...Do you think these scumbags (Clinton and Kofi) didn't have and utilize resources to cover up their crimes?

LOL

I love it. You make up all kinds of crap, and "substantiate" all of it with secret conspiracies. It's classic. What a way to debate. You're always "right." No proof, make up a conspiracy. Classic.

Mul, you sure put a smile on my face.

Substantiate this claim on Kofi's involvement with proof or give it up.

You say above about Kofi and Clinton without proof, it was a coverup conspiracy, then you turn around and say you KNOW Delay is innocent, and it's just a witch hunt with no proof. You haven't even seen the evidence, you just know this, right? How? Another CONSPIRACY?

HAHAHAHAHAHA

You continually substantiate my comments.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1128393575.jpg

Posting your girlfriend's pic again I see...

No, that deer in the headlights naivety reminds me of you cool_aid.

That's your girl. Admit it.



And not donning a tinfoil hat makes me "naive" now?


LMAO

You need another one...here....http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1128394267.jpg

I have to also admit, the conspiracies conveniently go across party lines as well. That's interesting, isn't it....

If it's a democrat doing wrong, it's the truth, if it's a republican doing wrong, it's a grand conspiracy. If a republican is vindicated, it's the truth. If a democrat is vindicated, it's a conspiracy.

Report something on the republicans in the media, it's a conspiracy. Report something on the democrats in the media, it's suddenly the truth.

How convenient how these conspiracies work...and so conveniently across party lines, isn't it? That's realistic. LOL

Maybe this will help ya coolie

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/15...CLZZZZZZZ_.jpg

It is available at Amazon.

Oh yeah, that's realistic as well. Now liberalism is a "mental disorder." That's as credible as saying conservativism is a "mental disorder."

Please, come back to us....please......

(sidenote, the best part of this is, I"m not even a liberal....LMAO). The rule of Mul's thumb is, disagree with Mul and they're a "liberal."

yep...big conspiracy


http://www.strangecosmos.com/images/content/107560.jpg

Who ordered the investigation of Kofi?

Yeah, I know, I know... in Mul's world...

So what do think about the money laundering charge against Delay?

You mean like the 9/11 commission was ordered by Bush? You mean like the federal investigation of Katrina was ordered by Bush?

Like that?

Again, IF YOU CAN PROVE Kofi was involved, LAY IT DOWN. I'll change my position. Until then, you sound like you're not rooted in reality.

Witch Hunt

http://www.faithmouse.com/daily703large.jpg

Who ordered the investigation of Kofi?

Yep, I thought so. Fits in with your conspiracy-laden mind. Not realistic, but I'm sure it's comforting to you to think that members of only one party do everything wrong and illegal, and members of the other party could do no wrong and nothing illegal. Like that's realistic....

LOL

Goodnight mul. Sleep well. Don't crush that tinfoil hat.

You mean like the 9/11 commission was ordered by Bush? You mean like the federal investigation of Katrina was ordered by Bush?

Like that?

Again, IF YOU CAN PROVE Kofi was involved, LAY IT DOWN. I'll change my position. Until then, you sound like you're not rooted in reality.

You are embarrassing yourself cool_aid...You would make a great Clinton intern, you are just his type.

LOL

Actually you're embarrassing yourself. Multiple times requests have been made to substantiate your claims, but you cannot. Why? Your claims are invented...in your head.

I'm sorry mul, believe all the conspiracies you want, that's your perojative, more power to you, but if you want to convince someone that something is the truth, you really should try to actually prove it.

And I wouldnt do Clinton if you gave me a million dollars...now Roberts, that's a different story.......

LOL

Goodnight.

She's not embarrassing herself. Only one out of the two of you thinks every acquittal/exoneration of a liberal is a conspiracy, and any charge against a conservative is also a conspiracy.

Here is a quick test. Can you name a single guilty conservative or innocent liberal? Does answering "no" to that question suggest you have a problem?

This aint New Zealand anymore Toto.

Let me tell you what Mulholland is like in reality; a super-nice guy, (I'm serious), really a big kid in large yoked body. Polite almost to a fault, until the talk turns to politics at which time a slight foam begins to form around his lips and you find yourself searching for the bazooka w/ the prozac darts in it. :cool:

I sorta expect that - I'm actually pretty nice in real life too. I'm just fascinated that Jason could be so biased. I couldn't stand it - I'd break down and hassle myself after about 30 mins. I can't handle that kind of unwavering conviction.

Truth is, I can tell that about Mulholland (super nice). I never doubted that. I can also tell he's a good person inside....
I can tell his heart is in the right place....

....except when it comes to politics. LOL

You make it really hard for me to hate you Speedo...http://www.socalevo.net/forum/Smiley...smf/idiot2.gif http://www.socalevo.net/forum/Smiley...f/knuppel2.gif :D

BTW...Could you fill that prozac dart up with some type of narcotic, it would be a freebee and I would appreciate it.

edit: Your smiley is getting sort of tired...try this one http://www.socalevo.net/forum/Smiley...coolsmiley.gif

The Washington Times
www.washingtontimes.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DeLay accuses Earle of taking corporate funds
By Stephen Dinan
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Published October 7, 2005

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rep. Tom DeLay said District Attorney Ronnie Earle, who is prosecuting him for trying to involve corporate money in Texas politics, has taken such contributions himself.
"It's real interesting he has this crusade against corporate funds. He took corporate funds, and he's taken union funds, for his own re-election. That's against the law," Mr. DeLay told The Washington Times yesterday.
A review of Mr. Earle's campaign-finance filings in Texas shows that he has received contributions from the AFL-CIO, including a $250 donation on Aug. 29, 2000. He also has received contributions listed on the disclosure forms only as coming from the name of an incorporated entity, often a law firm.
Mr. Earle has said repeatedly that state law bars corporate and union contributions. Attempts to reach Mr. Earle yesterday for comment, including a phone message left on his assistant's voice mail detailing Mr. DeLay's charge, were unsuccessful.
The prosecutor for Travis County, Texas, has secured indictments against Mr. DeLay on charges of conspiracy to violate campaign-finance laws, money laundering and conspiracy to launder money.
He argues that a political action committee founded by Mr. DeLay and run by associates of his collected corporate money and sent a check for $198,000 to the Republican National State Elections Committee (RNSEC), an arm of the Republican National Committee. The RNSEC then contributed money to state candidates in Texas -- donations that Mr. Earle says were an attempt to funnel corporate contributions into state races.
Mr. DeLay followed House Republican rules and stepped down as majority leader after the first indictment Sept. 28.
Party leaders have said he will return to his leadership post if he defeats the charges, but Mr. DeLay said he intends to run for the House again even if he is not majority leader.
"That's up to the people I represent, but I'm confident they'll send me back to do their work," he said. "No matter what title they give me back in Washington, I'm 'congressman' first. I intend to run, I intend to run harder than ever before, and I intend to win."
Mr. DeLay was interviewed by The Times in the majority leader's room just down the hallway from the front entrance to the House floor. He said he is eager to advance House Republicans' agenda and said for now he will fill the role of adviser to the leaders.
He said he and House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert, Illinois Republican, have forged a long partnership.
"He has expressed it this way -- I have institutional knowledge that's valuable. I have an energy level that's valuable. I have assets that are valuable. The leader's staff is still in place," he said. "I think most of the members will find there's not much, as far as their ability to have input into the agenda and into the leadership, it's not going to change a whole lot. So the Democrats did not win."
Mr. DeLay said the House will tackle most of the major issues that leaders have set out including reducing entitlement spending through the budget process, cutting taxes, passing new energy legislation and approving "a strong border-security bill and a bill that forces the government to enforce our immigration laws."
The Texan said his legal defense is simple.
"Money raised legally by corporations was sent to the RNSEC. They took that money -- what is it, Texas is only one of 16 states that forbids corporate funds to be in campaigns, the vast majority of the country's campaigns can accept corporate money -- that money went to them," he said. "In fact, $1.4 million was sent to Texas [by the RNSEC], not just $198,500."
Mr. DeLay said it's up to his lawyers whether to ask for a change of venue from Austin, a liberal enclave in the midst of one of the country's most conservative states.
Asked whether Mr. Earle should be disbarred, Mr. DeLay said he "ought to be held accountable."
"I don't know how, but there's all kinds of avenues, I'm told," he said. "You just think about how he has abused his power, how he has undermined the criminal justice system, how he is undermining the election system by criminalizing elections and dragging them into criminal courts, it's incredibly dangerous to our representative government. And if he's not held accountable, then other DAs who would like to do this can feel they can freely do it."
Mr. DeLay said he is convinced that Mr. Earle has coordinated with national Democratic officials, and said the same thing happened with outside groups when a Democratic member of Congress brought ethics charges against him last year.
"It was all set up with [Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington] -- they're out there doing the media stuff, paying for ads," he said. "One ad would start, stop at the end of the week, a new ad from another organization would start up -- my, isn't that a coincidence? That would go on for weeks."
He said he does not know whether Mr. Earle is taking orders from Washington, but said the entire situation is collaboration.
"If you step back and look at his operation for three years on this particular issue, talking to the press, of course he's talked to the Democratic leadership. I don't know who. But he's a political animal; he's not a district attorney," he said.
He also said the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee "was shopping the story" that Mr. DeLay was about to be indicted a day before the Sept. 28 indictment was handed up, which Mr. DeLay implied means that the DCCC had knowledge of secret proceedings.
"How did they know it was the deadline, number one, and how did they know I was going to be indicted the next day?" he said. "Isn't it amazing how much information they have when they're spinning you? All of that is coordinated."
Democrats have consistently said there is no basis to Mr. DeLay's charges.
"I know that Tom DeLay may find himself distracted by conspiracy-related issues, but I'm being honest when I say that there are no local or federal jurisdictions that allow the DCCC to indict anyone," DCCC spokesman Bill Burton said yesterday. "At some point, Tom DeLay is just going to have to come to grips with the fact that it's the evidence that did him in, not Web sites or newspapers or the staff of the DCCC."