Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   Why do liberals seek to limit free speech? (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/255338-why-do-liberals-seek-limit-free-speech.html)

RoninLB 12-12-2005 05:46 PM

Coulter doesn't even have to say a word at her meetings. She presents the far left to the moderates and lets them decide for themselves if they want to be represented by Dean Inc.

jorian 12-12-2005 07:23 PM

I don't see anyone claiming to be represented by Dean in this thread and wish Coulter didn't say anything, ever.

fintstone 12-12-2005 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by slakjaw
The much shorter man was able to defend himself against the much taller man. You call this a bad thing?
That is an amazing thing to say! The shorter man weighs at least 40 pounds more than the scrawny kid...and just turns around and punches him in the face. What a cheap shot! If you find that to be ok...you are sick indeed...although I find it typical of liberal union thugs (I hope he rots in jail...and then gets sued for everything he is worth...although I am sure that is nothing). No wonder the country has turned their back on the left.

Once again, why are liberals so intent upon preventing others from exercising their right to free speech. What are they afraid of?

slakjaw 12-13-2005 05:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by fintstone
That is an amazing thing to say! The shorter man weighs at least 40 pounds more than the scrawny kid...and just turns around and punches him in the face. What a cheap shot! If you find that to be ok...you are sick indeed...although I find it typical of liberal union thugs (I hope he rots in jail...and then gets sued for everything he is worth...although I am sure that is nothing). No wonder the country has turned their back on the left.

Once again, why are liberals so intent upon preventing others from exercising their right to free speech. What are they afraid of?


Flint,

Rember the post where the bush guy shot the non-bush guy. You said the exact same thing that I just said about the punch in the face.

I found that quite sick and I made a point to remember it.

I proved my point, you would be OK with it if it were the bush supporter throwing the punches! so, in your face, beeotch!

What I find "typical" about it is some bush supporter opening his fat ass mouth, then getting his ass kicked. I wish the cop hadnt been there!

Once again, why are liberals so intent upon preventing others from exercising their right to free speech. What are they afraid of?
WTF are you talking about? The "right" limits free speech more than anyone else in this country. A punch in the face (which was more than likely staged) is your whole premice for your sorry ass argument.

Nathans_Dad 12-13-2005 07:58 AM

Nothing like a good beeeotch to make you look really intelligent in your post...

RANDY P 12-13-2005 08:05 AM

I'm impressed.
 
It's better than slakjaws usual garbage. This time it appears to be a conscious thought.

Even though the message says 3rd grade schoolyard reasoning....

rjp

cool_chick 12-13-2005 02:37 PM

Re: I'm impressed.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by RANDY P
It's better than slakjaws usual garbage. This time it appears to be a conscious thought.

Even though the message says 3rd grade schoolyard reasoning....

rjp

With all due respect, the point is loud and clear.

Let me reiterate....

If it's a person who does not support Bush getting hit by a person who does support Bush, this is "ok" in the neocon's eyes. If a person does support Bush getting hit by a person who does not support Bush, it's a "bad thing" to do.....

It depends on who is hitting whom as to how "acceptable" it is.... and Slakjaw is pointing to a previous post as proof of this mentality.

Valid point IMO.

RoninLB 12-13-2005 04:33 PM

Let me reiterate....
Q. Who stays pregnant for a longer period of time, your wife or your elephant?
A. Paul Lynde: Who told you about my elephant?

RANDY P 12-13-2005 04:37 PM

:)

fintstone 12-13-2005 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by slakjaw
Flint,

Rember the post where the bush guy shot the non-bush guy. You said the exact same thing that I just said about the punch in the face.

I found that quite sick and I made a point to remember it.

I proved my point, you would be OK with it if it were the bush supporter throwing the punches! so, in your face, beeotch!

What I find "typical" about it is some bush supporter opening his fat ass mouth, then getting his ass kicked. I wish the cop hadnt been there!

Once again, why are liberals so intent upon preventing others from exercising their right to free speech. What are they afraid of?
WTF are you talking about? The "right" limits free speech more than anyone else in this country. A punch in the face (which was more than likely staged) is your whole premice for your sorry ass argument.

What are you talking about?

snowman 12-13-2005 04:52 PM

I read a good book last night. Yes Republicans CAN read. Got me thinking about liberals and why they are the way they are. They are just plain STUPID. Not intelligent, not smart, not even ordinary or retarded, but just plain stupid. Nothing else can explain their actions.

cool_chick 12-13-2005 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by snowman
I read a good book last night. Yes Republicans CAN read. Got me thinking about liberals and why they are the way they are. They are just plain STUPID. Not intelligent, not smart, not even ordinary or retarded, but just plain stupid. Nothing else can explain their actions.

LOL

You read a "good book" that leads you to believe this about such a huge segment of America? Just curious, what empirical evidence was produced which proved this theory? What means did this author use to come to this conclusion?

fintstone 12-13-2005 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by snowman
I read a good book last night. Yes Republicans CAN read. Got me thinking about liberals and why they are the way they are. They are just plain STUPID. Not intelligent, not smart, not even ordinary or retarded, but just plain stupid. Nothing else can explain their actions.
Heck...why would you need a book to find that out...just read the post above. I really don't even know what he is talking about. Is it some sort of ebonics?

Mulhollanddose 12-13-2005 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by snowman
I read a good book last night. Yes Republicans CAN read. Got me thinking about liberals and why they are the way they are. They are just plain STUPID. Not intelligent, not smart, not even ordinary or retarded, but just plain stupid. Nothing else can explain their actions.
Wrong. They can be spiritually diagnosed as evil, or, psychologically diagnosed as neurotic with delusional tendencies.








You think I am joking?...You are delusional.

RoninLB 12-13-2005 05:31 PM

Those who protest the Pres as a matter of course are rarely considered as part of history. Every Pres has had some group itch he couldn't scratch. If looking at general world wide democ/free societies over time the group itch is generally 9-13%.. not a really big deal.

Events seem to be ripe for reshaping Dem pol philosophy. Physical reshaping is already in motion if you consider the population group supporting different issues. And Lieberman will always be known as introducing philosophy for the future into dialog. The major blockage should be control of the party money[in one way or another]. So the biggest cash wad is in Dean's pocket today. Who knows about tomorrow?

The 1930s judicial reshaping, the Woodstock generation reshaping of socialist thought, the smart frustrated self loathing with superiority attitude Opinion Leaders is slowly going Kaput.


A 3rd party is inefficient and in many ways it can take power away from all voters in general. The DNC needs work. The Dems need someone to kick Deans ass and organize the party for the future.

The hate military and self defense attitude and actions is treason and should be at least considered in mainstream media. But it's not. Why not? It can't be always Ted Turner.. or Warner Bro/Fox Disney Prod/NBC. It's because the tv watchers don't won't to hear it and will become bored with any thought lasting more than 5sec and will flip channels.


Screw the haters..

cool_chick 12-13-2005 05:46 PM

YOu raise good points Ronin. I have to say I agree with you re: history....

Your summation of "liberals" appears to be offbase, but that's ok...misconceptions are common among most people in general...on both sides of the aisle.....it's what feeds this silliness, including people like Coulter. As well as this belief of political "reshaping." You bring up history....and history shows this is nothing new, no one's "going away", and like the last 200 years, things are the same and will remain the same....the "liberals" aren't "losing" and the conservatives aren't "losing" either. Balanced as it has been for 200 years now and will be for 200 years to come...

I might add, your final comment is a very good one....and this most certainly applies to the woman that is the subject of this thread......screw Coulter and her hate, she's a nothing nobody anyway.....she has zero power to do anything substantative. With what very little power she has...too bad she doesn't use it for good.

slakjaw 12-13-2005 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by fintstone
Heck...why would you need a book to find that out...just read the post above. I really don't even know what he is talking about. Is it some sort of ebonics?

Your memory is really bad. it is as bad as your taste in politics.

beeotch

slakjaw 12-13-2005 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by snowman
I read a good book last night. Yes Republicans CAN read. Got me thinking about liberals and why they are the way they are. They are just plain STUPID. Not intelligent, not smart, not even ordinary or retarded, but just plain stupid. Nothing else can explain their actions.
Was the book written by Mike Savage?

slakjaw 12-13-2005 06:56 PM

The 1930s judicial reshaping, the Woodstock generation reshaping of socialist thought, the smart frustrated self loathing with superiority attitude Opinion Leaders is slowly going Kaput.

It seems like that attitude is still alive and well to me.

A 3rd party is inefficient and in many ways it can take power away from all voters in general. The DNC needs work. The Dems need someone to kick Deans ass and organize the party for the future.

IMO a 3rd party is what we need. it could take power away from the ones who need it taken away. And yes the DNC needs an overhaul.

cool_chick 12-13-2005 07:01 PM

What we need is to eliminate the prevention tactics that are in place which does not allow a third party candidate to even get on the ballot!


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.