Was It All A Big Mistake?
 

Sad, sad, sad....

Click here.

Randy ;)

The guy sure embiggens the spirit of his cause...

lol

Since women vote about 70% socialist historically, I'd say yes, it was a mistake.

But, the real mistake is to allow a simple majority decide elections. We need both a "none of the above" vote and and a super-majority, that's 75-90%, to decide elections or the passage of laws.

Almost as good as Jay Leno's streetwalk's... The world is full of them and we drag them along with us as we move ahead.

That's the problem, Joe. Elections don't "move us ahead", they empower politicians to live off of us.

Had a chat with my wife yesterday as we lounged in a post-tax-season stupor. Apparently she's 100% against taxes but in favor of wealth redistribution.

Motherhood must be doing weird things to her brain.

I coulda used a none of the above choice in many recent elections. I like this. Of course, nobody would EVER get elected under these rules. Then what?

hilarious. made me smile..thanks for the funny, randy. :)
ryan

Or cry...wonder what the tuition is:)

Ripoff.
The Man Show did this back when Adam and Jimmy were still in charge.

Then we learn to live without coercive government. It's not only possible, it will eventually occur.

There's a pretty wide disconnect between those.

What is her explanation for the redistribution of private property?

She's a woman, no explanation needed! :rolleyes:

doomed.... we are all doomed.......

AFJ

I think the video proves the point.