Quote:
Originally posted by SoCal911SC
I recall from "A Brief History of Time" that physicists/astronomers/scientists seem to have a handle on the history of the universe from the split second AFTER the Big Bang, and it's pretty widely accepted.
But no one really has any idea of what occured BEFORE that split second.
At least that's what I recall, feel free to correct.
|
While it is true that we don't know what things looked like before the Big Bang, the Big Bang itself doesn't present as big of a problem as it once seemed.
A quote from Steven Hawking seems appropriate:
"It is perhaps ironic that, having changed my mind, I am now trying to convince other physicists that there was in fact no singularity at the beginning of the universe."
-Stephen Hawking (A Brief History of Time)
(the "singularity" being the problem where our understanding of the laws of physics broke down)
Interestingly, mbrane and string theory(s) holds the promise of explaining alot of this stuff. Mbrane theory has the potential to explain gravity (which is huge since we don't actually understand how gravity works).
As far as creation goes, I think it is much more exciting to actively try to figure out how we got here (through science) than to assume that we already know (through religion). If the scientific method reveals that a supernatural being created the universe and everything in it, then that's fine. At least we figured that out for ourselves and didn't take somebody else's word for it.
Mike
|